yeah i was talking about yah, no prob

 

I'd comment "of substance" but it's too long to read...

sigh guys, totally sigh.

Ok, I read it all.

 

Interesting analysis..,,

thanks for the props

 

I'm stuck in front of a computer for 3 hours, so I hope you guys enjoy my company.

why are u stuck?

soriano, the fact is that your thesis here makes people think that you KNOW FOR A FACT that this is the way of life. when you dont, because you dont know and have no proof. f*** your asumptions, no one cares. your the one that came up with this arguement no one said anything before. this is why people dont want to bother and argue because its "ok" to believe something and to believe you are right. but you think its the only way and do not accept that its not fact and that it could be wrong even though you think its right.

 

so please take it elseware where someone gives a s*** or dont bring it at all!

soriano, the fact is that your thesis here makes people think that you KNOW FOR A FACT that this is the way of life. when you dont, because you dont know and have no proof. f*** your asumptions, no one cares. your the one that came up with this arguement no one said anything before. this is why people dont want to bother and argue because its "ok" to believe something and to believe you are right. but you think its the only way and do not accept that its not fact and that it could be wrong even though you think its right.

 

so please take it elseware where someone gives a s*** or dont bring it at all!

No need to insult someone...

soriano, the fact is that your thesis here makes people think that you KNOW FOR A FACT that this is the way of life. when you dont, because you dont know and have no proof. f*** your asumptions, no one cares. your the one that came up with this arguement no one said anything before. this is why people dont want to bother and argue because its "ok" to believe something and to believe you are right. but you think its the only way and do not accept that its not fact and that it could be wrong even though you think its right.

 

so please take it elseware where someone gives a s*** or dont bring it at all!

say wha?

geez it's not that serious

why are u stuck?

I don't get paid unless I do what I am doing right now.

Just recently someone said that they are morally superior to myself, because their faith permits their entrance to heaven and my belief in needing evidence condemns me to hell.

I just have to clarify, that my comment was a joke and in no way I was serious about you going to hell and me to heaven... I forgot that it is impossible to have a decent conversation with you without making it in to a full blown debate.

soriano, the fact is that your thesis here makes people think that you KNOW FOR A FACT that this is the way of life. when you dont, because you dont know and have no proof. f*** your asumptions, no one cares. your the one that came up with this arguement no one said anything before. this is why people dont want to bother and argue because its "ok" to believe something and to believe you are right. but you think its the only way and do not accept that its not fact and that it could be wrong even though you think its right.

 

so please take it elseware where someone gives a s*** or dont bring it at all!

and this has anything to do with the development of unethical beliefs how how this is inconsistant with a "just" God?

 

The answer is no. Get a clue.

Just recently someone said that they are morally superior to myself, because their faith permits their entrance to heaven and my belief in needing evidence condemns me to hell.

I just have to clarify, that my comment was a joke and in no way I was serious about you going to hell and me to heaven... I forgot that it is impossible to have a decent conversation with you without making it in to a full blown debate. Yeah, i know it was kind of a joke, but the point is that's what the christian religion says and you always post things that imply your moral superiority. Remember, I truly don't know whether there is an after life or not (more likely not).

yeah, i know it was kind of a joke, but the point is that's what the christian religion says and you always post things that imply your moral superiority. Remember, I truly don't know whether there is an after life or not (more likely not).

Please post a link in which I said I am superior... Thanks

I said imply. You constantly feel justified to imply that I am always totally wrong about something and then just say, "Well, you're wrong, I'm right, and I don't feel like explaining my position" as if I am so despicable my comments are not even worth regarding.

I said imply. You constantly feel justified to imply that I am always totally wrong about something and then just say, "Well, you're wrong, I'm right, and I don't feel like explaining my position" as if I am so despicable my comments are not even worth regarding.

Again, that is a matter of opinion, not of facts... I never implied or said I am superior. That is your assumption.

Remember, I truly don't know whether there is an after life or not (more likely not).

so right there your saying that more likely not there is no afterlife. so you are doubting your beliefs? is this correct? why come up with all this bulls*** then?

I said imply. You constantly feel justified to imply that I am always totally wrong about something and then just say, "Well, you're wrong, I'm right, and I don't feel like explaining my position" as if I am so despicable my comments are not even worth regarding.

Again, that is a matter of opinion, not of facts... I never implied or said I am superior. That is your assumption. No, that is how you conduct yourself in conversation.

Remember, I truly don't know whether there is an after life or not (more likely not).

so right there your saying that more likely not there is no afterlife. so you are doubting your beliefs? is this correct? why come up with all this bulls*** then? You obviously are very tempered an unable to express yourself intelligently, bu tI will still answer your question.

 

The point of what I wrote wasn't to say I am definitely going to heaven. That's a joke. I was asserting that the attributes of the God most people believe in would reward and agnostic over someone with faith. That's the argument.

but you cant back it up. so theres no arguement

but you cant back it up. so theres no arguement

What the hell does that even mean? I can back up that you probably believe in an omnsicent and omnipotent God. I can also assert that logically such a God, blah blah blah, just go read the argument again.

 

If you counter argument is "you don't know", which as an agnostic I don't, then I suggest you read the part where I bash Pascal and William James.

what james meant was just in the case of "life worth living" meaning that if you believe your life is worth living, then it will be worth living. he only meant it for this particular case. nothing else. everything else u said about your gpa or the redsox is all nonsense. you cant change fact. "life worth living" is an opinion. not a fact.

what james meant was just in the case of "life worth living" meaning that if you believe your life is worth living, then it will be worth living. he only meant it for this particular case. nothing else. everything else u said about your gpa or the redsox is all nonsense. you cant change fact. "life worth living" is an opinion. not a fact.

Do you know who James is? He pushed for "pragmatic justification."

 

Go read up on that and stop accusing me of being illogical or just take my word with the following:

 

Pragmatic justification pretty much is that if you BELIEVE something to be true, it is true. James used this argument for everything, including his faith in christianity. However, I can simply use pragmatic justification to prove whatever the hell I want.

 

There's one HUGE flaw in pragmatic justification: it has no bearing in reality.

Pathetic counter arguments thus far:

 

ppffffttttt

*walks away slowly*

Is that the best you Christians can do? Being willfully ignorant cannot be going well with your creator. :lol You really think we want to waste our time arguing with you? No sweety, we have better things to do.

 

My comment was just poking fun at your reaction. It's obvious you love to argue and debate but geez...it's getting tired already. Find something else to do,man. Seriously.

1. I have nothing else to do until I get out of work.

 

The most of the stuff you see from me is me at work or me eating or both. That's when I post.

 

2. What you just said isn't a validation of your belief. It is just proof you have nothing intelligent to add are you are so thickheaded you cannot question your beliefs.

 

3. Your creator would not like your justification for being willfully ignorant.