June 10, 200422 yr Come on Al I don?t like Al Gore?s politics, I?ll readily admit it. I think he?s too concerned with snail darters and spotted owls and not concerned enough with the working people of this nation. I know he probably considers the internal combustion engine a bigger enemy of the U.S.A. as some of the lesser third world dictators but I at least thought that he was a rational and reasonable man. Well his verbal discourse of the past few days has made me seriously question this opinion. Accusing President Bush of being guilty of war crimes, calling Abu Ghirad , ?Bush?s gulag,? accusing Bush of denying terrorists their due civil rights, saying that there was no connection between Saddam Hussein?s regime and terror and saying that the President had betrayed the American people. Gore also claimed that Bush had abandoned a long and successful policy of containment in favor of preemption. Containment? Oh really? There were five terrorist attacks on the U.S.A. during the Clinton- Gore watch which went almost totally unanswered, plus Saddam tossed the U.N. weapons inspectors out on their ears which also went unanswered by the Clinton-Gore administration. Before Mr. Gore starts to attack so vehemently someone else for today?s terrorist troubles, he needs to clean up his own back yard. What about the first attack on the World Trade Center? What about Osama Bin Ladin?s involvement in Somalia, where the dirty s.o.b.s dragged one of our dead soldiers around in the dirt and Clinton-Gore?s response was to ignore it? What about the attack on the U.S.S. Cole, what was Mr. Clinton?s and Mr. Gore?s response? The Khobar Towers attack? And so on. Mr. Gore also called the prisoners at Abu Ghirad victims and said that what happened there was not the random acts of ?a few bad apples,? therefore indicting every man and woman who wears the uniform of the United States of America. I wish that Al Gore was as concerned about the beheading of an American citizen as he is with the rights of terrorists. I wish he was as concerned with the welfare of our troops as he is about the ?rights of terrorists.? I wish that Mr. Gore could realize that we are at war with the most ruthless, dangerous, and dishonorable enemy we have ever faced. I wish that if he was going to lay blame at the doorstep of a Presidential administration he could take a close look at the eight years he and Bill Clinton were at the helm and admit the truth that if the Clinton-Gore administration had taken advantage of the numerous opportunities they had to take Osama Bin Ladin into custody, maybe 9-11 would possibly never have happened. Or what if the Clinton-Gore administration had given a strong and decisive response to the other attacks that happened while they were in office. Use a little retrospect Mr. Gore. I know it would be painful but at least it would be honest. Pray for our troops. What do you think? God Bless America Charlie Daniels
June 10, 200422 yr Author I thank god everyday that Gore didn't win. I demand that we recount the WTC deat toll.
June 10, 200422 yr Author That's what the thread titles are for. You don't wanna read it, don't click. Seriously, though Das, you, as an Administrator, need to tell me if I should no longer post Charlie Daniels letters.
June 10, 200422 yr i dont care what you post.... its like a weekly charlie daniels love affair instead of originial thought. if thats what you like...go for it.
June 10, 200422 yr Author A fair point. I don't post a lot of my own thought here anymore... the liberal elite is very degrading to anyone who (God forbid) has traditional values... or screws up when they're drunk. I am sure that I'm not the only one who likes to read these letters. And if you haven't noticed, they're a great foundation for a debate. Isn't that what this forum is all about?
June 10, 200422 yr its a greatly biased, facts missing letter. the liberal elite here is just as bad as the conservative elite around here.
June 10, 200422 yr I think I'm gonna start posting some Michael Moore hair-on-fire stuff to off-set this right-wing-nut crap. :mischief
June 10, 200422 yr :mischief Are you cyber-stalking me Fish??? Why do I have the impression that whenever I post something the first one to answer with some smarty pants comment is you... :mischief2 Do I have to get the cyber-police on you? :mischief
June 10, 200422 yr :mischief Are you cyber-stalking me Fish??? Why do I have the impression that whenever I post something the first one to answer with some smarty pants comment is you... :mischief2 Do I have to get the cyber-police on you? :mischief I wasn't specifically posting in response to you, but if makes you fell better go for it. Besides, I'm too lazy to stalk anyone. Seems like alot of work.
June 10, 200422 yr what has this board become? an outlet for charlie daniels verbage? what, you mean you don't normally go to charlie daniels for political theory? he's right up there with Burke and Thomas Paine.
June 10, 200422 yr :mischief Are you cyber-stalking me Fish??? Why do I have the impression that whenever I post something the first one to answer with some smarty pants comment is you... :mischief2 Do I have to get the cyber-police on you? :mischief you're being watched, Lcyberlina.... :lol :lol :lol
June 10, 200422 yr :mischief Are you cyber-stalking me Fish??? Why do I have the impression that whenever I post something the first one to answer with some smarty pants comment is you... :mischief2 Do I have to get the cyber-police on you? :mischief you're being watched, Lcyberlina.... :lol :lol :lol :blink: :unsure : :ninja :
June 10, 200422 yr :mischief Are you cyber-stalking me Fish??? Why do I have the impression that whenever I post something the first one to answer with some smarty pants comment is you... :mischief2 Do I have to get the cyber-police on you? :mischief you're being watched, Lcyberlina.... :lol :lol :lol :blink: :unsure : :ninja : beware, wearing that thing over your head will only get you higher on the national security watch list. you will still be watched mam. :cool
June 10, 200422 yr :mischief Are you cyber-stalking me Fish??? Why do I have the impression that whenever I post something the first one to answer with some smarty pants comment is you... :mischief2 Do I have to get the cyber-police on you? :mischief you're being watched, Lcyberlina.... :lol :lol :lol :blink: :unsure : :ninja : beware, wearing that thing over your head will only get you higher on the national security watch list. you will still be watched mam. :cool I've got nothing to hide... Except that I don't like Bush... :ninja :
June 10, 200422 yr *Sits wanting to reply but afraid of being labelled a stalker* Come on Fish, you know you want to! BTW I hope you know I'm just joking... I actually have a sense of humor despite being a "flaming liberal" :mischief
June 10, 200422 yr When they attacked The USS Cole, Gore and Clinton did nothing? I guess having Clarke make a full fledged attack on Al Qaeda to have Bush take on(at the time of Clinton's time being up, the plan of that magnitude would have to be carried out by the next administration). Also what the hell is this about Gore not looking out for workers because Bush has such an amazing record, literally amazing record on how pro worker he is. You know with putting Eugene Scalia(Extreamly anti worker) in such a high posistion in the labor departement and all.
June 10, 200422 yr I guess having Clarke make a full fledged attack on Al Qaeda to have Bush take on(at the time of Clinton's time being up, the plan of that magnitude would have to be carried out by the next administration). Do you really thing that was in response to the Cole? I don't. I rather suspect it was one of hundreds of stock contingency plans that was pulled off the shelf and dusted off for implementation. Certainly the Taliban had bene high enough profile and irritating enough to warrant the generation of several contingency plans over the years. Care to take a look at The August 12th 2002 copy of Time Magazine. Clinton gave order to Clarke to draw up a plan which he did which would systematically stop Al Qaeda and not through simple brute force. It would help countries failing at stopping them but also put their financial situation and chain of leaders in such array, carrying out a major attack would be neutralized. He gave it to Sandy Berger who gave it to Condi Rice and who the hell knows where it went from there. One of Bush's own aides said that it would be what we have done since 9/11, only before that diasaster ever could have occured. The plan was there in responce to The Cole, to stop Al Qaeda. If you would like to prove that statement wrong, go ahead.
June 11, 200422 yr Author what has this board become? an outlet for charlie daniels verbage? what, you mean you don't normally go to charlie daniels for political theory? he's right up there with Burke and Thomas Paine. :lol :lol :lol
June 11, 200422 yr That's what the thread titles are for. You don't wanna read it, don't click. Seriously, though Das, you, as an Administrator, need to tell me if I should no longer post Charlie Daniels letters. Post em' whenever you want dooder.
June 11, 200422 yr Author Thanks bro. I don't post all of them, just the ones that look like they'll spawn an entertaining debate. Peace :cool
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.