http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=100...=top_world_news

 

April 12 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. has no exit strategy or timetable for withdrawing its forces from Iraq and a pull-out depends on the readiness of the Iraqi Security Forces, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said.

.

.

.

 

 

Here's the real exit strategy: :lol

Unfortunately, you could be right.

Until you go back to using tonyi, I refuse to give reasonable responses.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=100...=top_world_news

 

April 12 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. has no exit strategy or timetable for withdrawing its forces from Iraq and a pull-out depends on the readiness of the Iraqi Security Forces, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said.

.

.

.

 

 

Here's the real exit strategy: :lol

 

745139[/snapback]

What do you think the chances of this happening are?

further proof this adminstration has no clue and are is just simply imperialistic, and couldnt give two shits about the people they are supposed to care about.

Isn't impirialism supposed to have nifty phat payoffs in terms of exploiting the occupied areas?

Isn't impirialism supposed to have nifty phat payoffs in terms of exploiting the occupied areas?

745996[/snapback]

 

 

 

in the old definition...yes.

 

 

in many ways there are many ways to exploit the middle eastern nations.

Now that the cold was is over, could you list a few of these "many ways" ways? Say three or four.

 

Cold war proxies were obvious.

I'll be a real sport here - how about only one or two of these "many ways" the US can exploit ME nations?

 

Certainly, if there are "many", you should be able to rattle off the "highlights reel" with no problem at all.

You had an ample opportunity to foster reasonable discussion through shamrock's cordial question for your opinion.

 

 

Instead you chose to antagonize someone again with another condecending line of inquiry.

Well we sure aren't exploiting them for their oil. That was Wolfy's grand plan to have the Iraqi reconstruction "pay for itself". How's that working out by the way?

You had an ample opportunity to foster reasonable discussion through shamrock's cordial question for your opinion.

 

Instead you chose to antagonize someone again with another condecending line of inquiry.

 

Asking for an example of a claim isn't condecending.

 

As for Shamrock's question - do you really believe it required an answer? Do you really believe they are so uninformed as to not know what the real probability of that question is? Maybe if he/she/it were a 10 year old, but he/she/it isn't 10 based on their language usage in past posts.

 

OK though, I'll humor you.

 

My opinion the chances of that happening is somewhere between very very slim and none. To put a number on it: 0.00001

 

A glance at this sat pic tell the whole "Iran (non)invasion" story...for anyone who is at least a bit cluefull that is.

Well we sure aren't exploiting them for their oil. That was Wolfy's grand plan to have the Iraqi reconstruction "pay for itself". How's that working out by the way?

746337[/snapback]

The reconstruction or the Wolfowitz scheme?

 

Maybe we should exploit them.

further proof this adminstration has no clue and are is just simply imperialistic, and couldnt give two shits about the people they are supposed to care about.

745990[/snapback]

 

Imperialistic - no.

pray tell me what is the goal of this little exercise in iraq?

I couldn't tell you that