January 8, 200620 yr thats cool but u think cutler will drop to the fins No, they'll have to trade up about 5 or 6 spots, but he'll be worth it. If Young hadn't declared, Cutler might be a top 7 or 8 pick.
January 8, 200620 yr Author I like alot of the qbs coming out in the draft this year. If cutler isnt there at 16. My next choice would be omar jacobs i really like this guy. hes mobile and can throw the ball all over the place something that we need with our o line some one who can move and get the ball out to chambers accurately .Now im not saying we take him at 15 beacuse he should be aroung in the second or third round we should use that 15 for a Oline Marcuse Mcneil. Or maybe look for a 3/4 WR beacuse Gilmore isnt cutting it and Welker is only a possesion reciever at most and should be more focused on being the awsome return man that he is
January 8, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints
January 8, 200620 yr Sweet, I love the guy, and it'll drop Cutler back further for the Fins. :thumbup :thumbup :thumbup :thumbup :thumbup exactly. He will be gone top 5 but lowers cutler's stock. We might even be able to trade back and pick up Jay I like alot of the qbs coming out in the draft this year. If cutler isnt there at 16. My next choice would be omar jacobs i really like this guy. hes mobile and can throw the ball all over the place something that we need with our o line some one who can move and get the ball out to chambers accurately .Now im not saying we take him at 15 beacuse he should be aroung in the second or third round we should use that 15 for a Oline Marcuse Mcneil. Or maybe look for a 3/4 WR beacuse Gilmore isnt cutting it and Welker is only a possesion reciever at most and should be more focused on being the awsome return man that he is omar would be a good project in the third. There is a rumor Jamarcus Russel might declare too. I would have to look at him long and hard too for he has a great arm and accuracy when healthy. Stanton would interest me, Croyle too.
January 8, 200620 yr Author I like alot of the qbs coming out in the draft this year. If cutler isnt there at 16. My next choice would be omar jacobs i really like this guy. hes mobile and can throw the ball all over the place something that we need with our o line some one who can move and get the ball out to chambers accurately .Now im not saying we take him at 15 beacuse he should be aroung in the second or third round we should use that 15 for a Oline Marcuse Mcneil. Or maybe look for a 3/4 WR beacuse Gilmore isnt cutting it and Welker is only a possesion reciever at most and should be more focused on being the awsome return man that he is omar would be a good project in the third. There is a rumor Jamarcus Russel might declare too. I would have to look at him long and hard too for he has a great arm and accuracy when healthy. Stanton would interest me, Croyle too. i know there is alot of talent in the Qb spot this year you just have to be open minded and realize there are great nfl caliber Qbs outside of Leinart Young and Cutler.
January 8, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints I'm fairly certin NO already indicated Leinart was their first choice.
January 8, 200620 yr I like alot of the qbs coming out in the draft this year. If cutler isnt there at 16. My next choice would be omar jacobs i really like this guy. hes mobile and can throw the ball all over the place something that we need with our o line some one who can move and get the ball out to chambers accurately .Now im not saying we take him at 15 beacuse he should be aroung in the second or third round we should use that 15 for a Oline Marcuse Mcneil. Or maybe look for a 3/4 WR beacuse Gilmore isnt cutting it and Welker is only a possesion reciever at most and should be more focused on being the awsome return man that he is omar would be a good project in the third. There is a rumor Jamarcus Russel might declare too. I would have to look at him long and hard too for he has a great arm and accuracy when healthy. Stanton would interest me, Croyle too. i know there is alot of talent in the Qb spot this year you just have to be open minded and realize there are great nfl caliber Qbs outside of Leinart Young and Cutler. agreed, if one of those big hogs like Scott is there at 15 I have a hard time passing on him really. Or huff ( I think he will end up in the top of the draft though). I also have some interest in whitehurst later in the draft.
January 8, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints I'm fairly certin NO already indicated Leinart was their first choice. I think that'd be a mistake for them. Not to be a bandwagon Vince Young advocate, but what the Saints need is a leader and solidarity at the QB position. Leinart is good, but he is not that answer.
January 8, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints I'm fairly certin NO already indicated Leinart was their first choice. I think that'd be a mistake for them. Not to be a bandwagon Vince Young advocate, but what the Saints need is a leader and solidarity at the QB position. Leinart is good, but he is not that answer. I'd take Leinart before Young, but that's just me. Why is Young a "leader" but Leinart not?
January 8, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints I'm fairly certin NO already indicated Leinart was their first choice. I think that'd be a mistake for them. Not to be a bandwagon Vince Young advocate, but what the Saints need is a leader and solidarity at the QB position. Leinart is good, but he is not that answer. I'd take Leinart before Young, but that's just me. Why is Young a "leader" but Leinart not? I think its largely based on Vince Young absolutely putting the Texas team on his shoulders and leading them to a national championship.
January 8, 200620 yr Author that was an amazing performance by Young and something i havent seen from a player in a while
January 9, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints I'm fairly certin NO already indicated Leinart was their first choice. I think that'd be a mistake for them. Not to be a bandwagon Vince Young advocate, but what the Saints need is a leader and solidarity at the QB position. Leinart is good, but he is not that answer. I'd take Leinart before Young, but that's just me. Why is Young a "leader" but Leinart not? I think its largely based on Vince Young absolutely putting the Texas team on his shoulders and leading them to a national championship. Meh, that's pretty dumb. Leinart only lost twice in college, so if you're going by that line of thinking, it's not like he lacks "leadership" skills.
January 9, 200620 yr Yeah. Team record is not worth looking at if you compare the two, since they have the same number of losses (with Young playing in a real conference).
January 9, 200620 yr Leinart is a Ken Dorsey clone with a little more mobility. That is it. I think, unfortunately, he will be the biggest QB bust since Ryan Leaf.
January 9, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints I'm fairly certin NO already indicated Leinart was their first choice. I think that'd be a mistake for them. Not to be a bandwagon Vince Young advocate, but what the Saints need is a leader and solidarity at the QB position. Leinart is good, but he is not that answer. I'd take Leinart before Young, but that's just me. Why is Young a "leader" but Leinart not? I think its largely based on Vince Young absolutely putting the Texas team on his shoulders and leading them to a national championship. Meh, that's pretty dumb. Leinart only lost twice in college, so if you're going by that line of thinking, it's not like he lacks "leadership" skills. ya try picking up on the entire story there. Young had the same amount of losses as Matt and ended his career on a 20 game win streak, including two absolutely amazing performanes in the Rose Bowl two years in a row. The second being even more titilating than the first which few thought was truly possible.
January 9, 200620 yr Leinart is a Ken Dorsey clone with a little more mobility. That is it. I think, unfortunately, he will be the biggest QB bust since Ryan Leaf. WOW! I dont think he'll be that bad... Leaf was pretty pathetic...
January 9, 200620 yr Vince, NOT a surprise... Nothing much for him to play for in the college level. I still think Bush goes number 1 to the Texans... Young to the Saints I'm fairly certin NO already indicated Leinart was their first choice. I think that'd be a mistake for them. Not to be a bandwagon Vince Young advocate, but what the Saints need is a leader and solidarity at the QB position. Leinart is good, but he is not that answer. I'd take Leinart before Young, but that's just me. Why is Young a "leader" but Leinart not? I think its largely based on Vince Young absolutely putting the Texas team on his shoulders and leading them to a national championship. Meh, that's pretty dumb. Leinart only lost twice in college, so if you're going by that line of thinking, it's not like he lacks "leadership" skills. ya try picking up on the entire story there. Young had the same amount of losses as Matt and ended his career on a 20 game win streak, including two absolutely amazing performanes in the Rose Bowl two years in a row. The second being even more titilating than the first which few thought was truly possible. So he's more of a "leader" because of the current winning streak (Leinart had a pretty strong one going until last Wednesday) and the Rose Bowl performances? Leinart played pretty damn well in big games himself (Orange Bowl vs Oklahoma, Rose Bowl vs Michigan) and wasn't exactly garbage in the Rose Bowl this year. They had similar college records, similar performances in big games, but because Young's Rose Bowl this year was better than Leinart's, he's now more of a "leader"? That's crap. Arguing who is more talented is one thing, but the "leadership" angle largely because of a performance in one game is stupid.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.