June 28, 200619 yr HITTING SIDE AVG (Contact) AL .294 1. Toronto Blue Jays AL .287 2. Boston Red Sox AL .285 3. New York Yankees AL .284 4. Texas Rangers AL .283 5. Chicago White Sox NL .282 6. Los Angeles Dodgers AL .281 7. Cleveland Indians NL .280 8. St. Louis Cardinals AL .276 9. Detroit Tigers AL .272 10. Seattle Mariners AL .272 11. Minnesota Twins AL .270 12. Baltimore Orioles NL .269 13. Colorado Rockies NL .269 14. New York Mets NL .266 15. Arizona Diamondbacks NL .263 16. Florida Marlins 6/16 Top half in the NL with pitcher at #9 :thumbup NL .263 17. Milwaukee Brewers AL .261 18. Kansas City Royals NL .260 19. Atlanta Braves NL .259 20. Chicago Cubs NL .259 21. Houston Astros NL .259 22. Pittsburgh Pirates NL .258 23. Cincinnati Reds NL .258 24. San Francisco Giants NL .256 25. Washington Nationals AL .255 26. Los Angeles Angels NL .255 27. San Diego Padres NL .253 28. Philadelphia Phillies AL .252 29. Oakland Athletics AL .248 30. Tampa Bay Devil Rays HR (Power) AL 111 1. Chicago White Sox AL 106 2. Detroit Tigers NL 105 3. Cincinnati Reds AL 105 4. Toronto Blue Jays NL 104 5. New York Mets NL 102 6. Milwaukee Brewers NL 097 7. Philadelphia Phillies AL 095 8. Cleveland Indians AL 092 9. Tampa Bay Devil Rays AL 090 10. New York Yankees AL 089 11. Boston Red Sox NL 089 12. Atlanta Braves NL 086 13. Pittsburgh Pirates AL 085 14. Oakland Athletics AL 084 15. Baltimore Orioles AL 084 16. Texas Rangers NL 083 17. Washington Nationals NL 082 18. Houston Astros AL 078 19. Seattle Mariners NL 074 20. Florida Marlins 9/16 in a pitching ballpark almost made it to top half in NL :thumbup NL 073 21. Arizona Diamondbacks NL 072 22. Colorado Rockies AL 070 23. Los Angeles Angels NL 070 24. Los Angeles Dodgers NL 070 25. St. Louis Cardinals NL 069 26. San Diego Padres NL 069 27. San Francisco Giants AL 067 28. Minnesota Twins NL 061 29. Chicago Cubs AL 053 30. Kansas City Royals SB (Speed) NL 84 1. New York Mets AL 71 2. Baltimore Orioles AL 65 3. Los Angeles Angels NL 63 4. Cincinnati Reds NL 63 5. Los Angeles Dodgers AL 60 6. New York Yankees NL 57 7. San Diego Padres AL 57 8. Seattle Mariners AL 57 9. Tampa Bay Devil Rays NL 56 10. Florida Marlins 5/16 Top half in NL again :thumbup NL 50 11. Chicago Cubs AL 47 12. Chicago White Sox AL 45 13. Minnesota Twins NL 44 14. Philadelphia Phillies NL 43 15. Milwaukee Brewers NL 42 16. Washington Nationals NL 38 17. Arizona Diamondbacks NL 34 18. Houston Astros AL 34 19. Toronto Blue Jays NL 34 20. Atlanta Braves NL 32 21. St. Louis Cardinals NL 30 22. Colorado Rockies AL 28 23. Detroit Tigers NL 28 24. Pittsburgh Pirates AL 26 25. Cleveland Indians AL 25 26. Kansas City Royals AL 23 27. Texas Rangers AL 22 28. Boston Red Sox AL 20 29. Oakland Athletics NL 19 30. San Francisco Giants SO (Hitter Eye) NL 601 1. Florida Marlins 1/16, Atliest it make the pitcher work though :thumbdown NL 590 2. Milwaukee Brewers NL 588 3. Atlanta Braves AL 576 4. Detroit Tigers NL 557 5. Cincinnati Reds NL 551 6. Pittsburgh Pirates NL 549 7. Philadelphia Phillies NL 521 8. Washington Nationals NL 521 9. San Diego Padres NL 513 10. Houston Astros AL 508 11. Cleveland Indians AL 506 12. Tampa Bay Devil Rays NL 505 13. Colorado Rockies AL 502 14. Texas Rangers NL 498 15. New York Mets AL 489 16. Chicago White Sox AL 464 17. Kansas City Royals AL 458 18. New York Yankees NL 450 19. Arizona Diamondbacks AL 449 20. Los Angeles Angels AL 447 21. Boston Red Sox AL 441 22. Oakland Athletics AL 438 23. Seattle Mariners NL 436 24. Los Angeles Dodgers AL 426 25. Minnesota Twins AL 408 26. Baltimore Orioles NL 396 27. St. Louis Cardinals AL 393 28. Toronto Blue Jays NL 390 29. San Francisco Giants NL 383 30. Chicago Cubs PITCHING SIDE ERA (Pitcher Effectiveness) AL 3.50 1. Detroit Tigers NL 3.90 2. New York Mets NL 3.98 3. San Diego Padres AL 4.17 4. Oakland Athletics NL 4.19 5. Florida Marlins 3/16 Top 4 in NL :notworthy AL 4.20 6. Los Angeles Angels AL 4.21 7. New York Yankees NL 4.26 8. Colorado Rockies AL 4.32 9. Chicago White Sox NL 4.34 10. Los Angeles Dodgers AL 4.37 11. Minnesota Twins NL 4.38 12. San Francisco Giants AL 4.43 13. Seattle Mariners NL 4.50 14. St. Louis Cardinals NL 4.54 15. Cincinnati Reds NL 4.59 16. Arizona Diamondbacks AL 4.64 17. Boston Red Sox AL 4.66 18. Toronto Blue Jays NL 4.68 19. Washington Nationals NL 4.69 20. Houston Astros NL 4.69 21. Atlanta Braves AL 4.75 22. Texas Rangers NL 4.79 23. Philadelphia Phillies AL 4.81 24. Cleveland Indians NL 4.88 25. Chicago Cubs NL 4.88 26. Pittsburgh Pirates NL 4.95 27. Milwaukee Brewers AL 5.01 28. Tampa Bay Devil Rays AL 5.19 29. Baltimore Orioles AL 5.84 30. Kansas City Royals
June 28, 200619 yr Author Not bad but could be better :thumbup I'm going to continue building this, I heard Marlins ERA are somewhere on top. I'll check that out.
June 28, 200619 yr It's kind of a strange sample right now because so far this season they've either been really bad, or really good.
June 28, 200619 yr So basically, we are average or worse at everything but team ERA. we are in the upper half in our league in everything but homers.
June 28, 200619 yr We're in no ways a great offensive team, but we have been mighty clutch this year. That's one thing that numbers haven't shown.
June 28, 200619 yr We're in no ways a great offensive team, but we have been mighty clutch this year. That's one thing that numbers haven't shown. Thats because clutch is for the most part coincidental.
June 28, 200619 yr We're in no ways a great offensive team, but we have been mighty clutch this year. That's one thing that numbers haven't shown. Thats because clutch is for the most part coincidental. And luck, to be honest. Miguel Olivo even said it about his 3-run HR after the game: 'I just got lucky'.
June 28, 200619 yr Author We're in no ways a great offensive team, but we have been mighty clutch this year. That's one thing that numbers haven't shown. We do have that 9th hitter black hole. I hope the editing make this team stat more respectable.
June 28, 200619 yr We're in no ways a great offensive team, but we have been mighty clutch this year. That's one thing that numbers haven't shown. Thats because clutch is for the most part coincidental. And luck, to be honest. Miguel Olivo even said it about his 3-run HR after the game: 'I just got lucky'. no thats the definition of humility....he's not going to go saying he is the greatest and most prolific power hitter and 1st of all hitting a homerun in the bigs is not lucky and especially judging by how fwar he hit it....and he hit another bomb.......so he didn't get "lucky"
June 28, 200619 yr i would say he got lucky that he saw pitches that could be launched into the stratsphere...thats the only luck he had...at some point...we will all have to conclude that olivo maybe...just maybe has some talent and isnt just a lucky guy
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.