Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

MarlinsBaseball.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

SI <3 Hanley

Featured Replies

Either way...Ill take shots at Eckstein any chance I get. I dont think there is a player(outside of Barry Bonds) that I detest more.

 

For the record, none of those thigns are real, except Eckstein's heart, which is massive for his undersize 5 year old's body. If Eckstein ever had a Grinch-esque situation where his heart grew 3 times in one day due to to the kindness of townsfolk, his chest cavitiy would literally explode because his heart would be larger than his torso.

Reyes > Hanley.

 

and it AINT close AT ALL defensively. not close AT ALL.

 

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

 

:whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle :whistle

Reyes > Hanley.

 

and it AINT close AT ALL defensively. not close AT ALL.

 

It's really funny how dumb you are. Like I literally "lol'ed" just now.

Reyes > Hanley.

 

and it AINT close AT ALL defensively. not close AT ALL.

Take a look at the numbers if you can get your head dislodged from your ass.

Reyes > Hanley.

 

and it AINT close AT ALL defensively. not close AT ALL.

Take a look at the numbers if you can get your head dislodged from your ass.

Reyes > Hanley.

 

and it AINT close AT ALL defensively. not close AT ALL.

Take a look at the numbers if you can get your head dislodged from your ass.

 

:notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy

How do I calculate big heart/little body factor?

 

I've forgotten.

 

bob?

Crimson?

 

I believe it is Weight / Total bases per 162 games x Whiteness. It's a pretty simple equation.

How do I calculate big heart/little body factor?

 

I've forgotten.

 

bob?

Crimson?

 

I believe it is Weight / Total bases per 162 games x Whiteness. It's a pretty simple equation.

 

Bobbob's got it mainly right. Some people dispute this, but I think that Whiteness is undervalued in bobbob's formula. (Think OBP in OPS) Personally, I go with Whiteness2.

How do I calculate big heart/little body factor?

 

I've forgotten.

 

bob?

Crimson?

 

I believe it is Weight / Total bases per 162 games x Whiteness. It's a pretty simple equation.

 

Bobbob's got it mainly right. Some people dispute this, but I think that Whiteness is undervalued in bobbob's formula. (Think OBP in OPS) Personally, I go with Whiteness2.

 

I feel a really good way of doing it is (Whiteness x amount of facial hair). It generally gives you a less inflated value.

I feel a really good way of doing it is (Whiteness x amount of facial hair). It generally gives you a less inflated value.

 

It might, but that brings in a whole new set of problems. Now, you have to make sure you adjust for eras. The 60s and 70s were definitely facial hair era, while now we're in a decisively clean shaven time. Not to mention, you have to consider all the hypotheticals that arise with current Yankee and Girardi-Era Marlins players. For example, how White would Andy Phillips be if he had been allowed to grow facial hair? I mean that's alot of confounding factors. Square it and be done with it. That's my view.

I feel a really good way of doing it is (Whiteness x amount of facial hair). It generally gives you a less inflated value.

 

It might, but that brings in a whole new set of problems. Now, you have to make sure you adjust for eras. The 60s and 70s were definitely facial hair era, while now we're in a decisively clean shaven time. Not to mention, you have to consider all the hypotheticals that arise with current Yankee and Girardi-Era Marlins players. For example, how White would Andy Phillips be if he had been allowed to grow facial hair? I mean that's alot of confounding factors. Square it and be done with it. That's my view.

 

You bring up valid points. I will reassess my numbers and get back to you.

Do you factor any surfer type neckware or not? I always get confused. I value the hemp necklace but I know others prefer those with a large ammounts of beads.

 

Anything to clarify would be appreciated.

Do you factor any surfer type neckware or not? I always get confused. I value the hemp necklace but I know others prefer those with a large ammounts of beads.

 

Anything to clarify would be appreciated.

 

Absolutely. At least for me, there's a definitive hierarchy. (In descending order of whiteness) Puka shell necklace -> Hemp necklace -> Anything else.

I feel a really good way of doing it is (Whiteness x amount of facial hair). It generally gives you a less inflated value.

 

It might, but that brings in a whole new set of problems. Now, you have to make sure you adjust for eras. The 60s and 70s were definitely facial hair era, while now we're in a decisively clean shaven time. Not to mention, you have to consider all the hypotheticals that arise with current Yankee and Girardi-Era Marlins players. For example, how White would Andy Phillips be if he had been allowed to grow facial hair? I mean that's alot of confounding factors. Square it and be done with it. That's my view.

 

How do we account for the use of performance enhacing hair dyes? Should asterisks be placed along all the records of a player suspected of using performance enhancers? The Rogaine Era has put a dark (henna black) cloud over the sport.

 

MLB needs to find a way to test for plugs and weaves, those IMO are the future.

 

Speaking of which, an insider that sits in my section says Mike Lowell was a prevalent Rogaine user in his time on the Marlins. Would he have hit 30 homers w/o the use of hair dyes?

The flip side of that iFesta is that Lowell is off the hair dye and is sporting the salt and pepper look.

 

I can't confirm or deny the use of hair growth products but coming off the dye and having one of his best seasons in a while says a lot about the real effect dye has on the ratio.

He might have gone off the dyes and gone to the plugs. As I said earlier, the testing for that is in it's infancy. We will never have an accurate estimate of what % of MLB players were on these drugs.

 

I would like to mention, Mike Lowell has not been convicted in a court of law of using performance enhancing hair dyes. This is all conjecture on my part. There is tons of circumstantial evidence on the issue though. Mike Lowell's hair stylist is serving time for being in contempt of court in regards to the issue. Dan LeBatard and Greg Cote of The Miami Herald have also written a book (titled: Game of Shades) documenting Lowell's Rogaine use.

hanley is by far a better power hitter / more cosistent hitter.

 

reyes is by far a better player all around and it aint close at all defensively and is better at everything else except power numbers really.

hanley is by far a better power hitter / more cosistent hitter.

 

reyes is by far a better player all around and it aint close at all defensively and is better at everything else except power numbers really.

 

Hanley is a far better player all around, and it isn't close. Reyes isn't near as good a defensive player as you give him credit for. He's middle of the league, Hanley's near the bottom of the league. He can't make up for just how much better Hanley is with the bat. It's not even close.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Background Picker
Customize Layout

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.