It doesn't really make a difference to me, whether we have landed on the moon or not doesn't affect my life in any way at all but I still don't believe it unless you give me proof that cannot be proven wrong.

 

But hey, that's just me.

uh, go here dude:

http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/

how do you know its undeniable?

 

 

have you seen the surface of the moon with your eyes?

how do you know its undeniable?

 

 

have you seen the surface of the moon with your eyes?

have you seen moscow with your own eyes?

 

 

if you deny moscow's existence as much as the moon landing, at least you are consistent. Every medium of evidence exist proves the moon landing exist besides your personal testimony. I don't doubt proplayers exist, even though I only saw it on tv...it could be an elaborate hoax.

I believe it 100%...you can see it for yourself if you look at the moon with a strong enough telescope. The evidence is everywhere, it's stupid to believe that we faked it. It would have leaked out eventually if we did.

why was there a new thred on this? i dont feel like explaining again.. sigh.

why was there a new thred on this? i dont feel like explaining again.. sigh.

LOL Then don't.

I believe it 100%...you can see it for yourself if you look at the moon with a strong enough telescope. The evidence is everywhere, it's stupid to believe that we faked it. It would have leaked out eventually if we did.

i have a pretty powerful telescope....

 

what am i looking for exactly?

yes we landed on the moon

then explain why the photos were edited cuz the little aiming ticker mark thing was obviously edited and the flag wouldnt be able to wave like it did in space.. it was staged in area 51, but we did land on the moon. we just had no choice but to hoax the live telcast cuz we HAD to be at russia to teh moon doods.

flag wouldnt be able to wave like it did in space..

There's something called "the laws of physics"...if they faked it, they would do it inside, not outside where the wind can screw around.

 

then explain why the photos were edited cuz the little aiming ticker mark thing was obviously edited

white color when it is very intense (because the sun is directly hitting it) will force the color to bleed over. stare at a lightbulb and put a thread in front of your eye...you'll see.

 

 

Just check my links.

what a beautiful thing, when Sorianofan and I actually agree on something. It makes things easy. Go get em!

what a beautiful thing, when Sorianofan and I actually agree on something. It makes things easy. Go get em!

I think we agreed on one other issue, the horatio alger whatever thingy...

true...true...that one didnt really go anywhere though did it?

flag wouldnt be able to wave like it did in space..?

There's something called "the laws of physics"...if they faked it, they would do it inside, not outside where the wind can screw around.

 

then explain why the photos were edited cuz the little aiming ticker mark thing was obviously edited

white color when it is very intense (because the sun is directly hitting it) will force the color to bleed over. stare at a lightbulb and put a thread in front of your eye...you'll see.

 

 

Just check my links.thanks for tellin me the flag thing for the 10th time dood.. im just sayin that the laws of physics thing doesnt apply here because it was waving too fast. did you see how fast it wa s waving? unless the guy was waving that thing like at a halftime show it couldnt wave that fast unless wind.

 

and for the pictures im not talking about the color or bleed or w/e. im talking about hte little aiming ticker thingys. they were placed over it and were clearly editied. they dont even argue it was editied. im not gonna click ur links cuz my comp is to slow and i alredy kno this stuf

true...true...that one didnt really go anywhere though did it?

yeah, because the claims it made weren't really substantiated!

 

thanks for tellin me the flag thing for the 10th time dood.. im just sayin that the laws of physics thing doesnt apply here because it was waving too fast. did you see how fast it wa s waving? unless the guy was waving that thing like at a halftime show it couldnt wave that fast unless wind.

Uh, without any atmosphere, there is no friction created by the atmosphere to stop anything in a 1/6th earth gravity environment to move in such a fashion. Furthermore, did they do the "fake moonlanding" live so they couldn't edit out the "waving flag" scene? That's ridiculous.

 

and for the pictures im not talking about the color or bleed or w/e. im talking about hte little aiming ticker thingys. they were placed over it and were clearly editied. they dont even argue it was editied. im not gonna click ur links cuz my comp is to slow and i alredy kno this stuf

Uh, the little cross/plus sign thingies that look like this: +

 

they're all over every photo, because on the actual glass/lense thing, they were imprinted onto it, so every picture has them. However, when strong sunlight hits WHITE objects the color will bleed over.

 

The pro-hoax people just have a really crappy understanding of science. Don't take their word for it. How about the hundreds of pounds of moon rocks that COULD not be duplicated on earth? That's is real life tangible evidence. All this other stuff does not even have to be considered.

or they could just be asking questions for the sake of asking them in order to try and discover something.

or they could just be asking questions for the sake of asking them in order to try and discover something.

what if all those questions lead to the same conclusion anyway? Lies and misleading propaganda is the only reason an obvious fact is being doubted.

I'll go back to something Yenta said...

 

Das I'm assuming you've never flown in space around the world therefore you must be one who believes the world is flat, am I right?

no but i have sailed and i didnt fall off the earth somewhere, therefore it has to be round.

no but i have sailed and i didnt fall off the earth somewhere, therefore it has to be round.

So you sailed to The South Pole?

the south pole no there is nothing there.

the south pole no there is nothing there.

Therefore you can not succesfully say that The Earth is Round because you have never been to the south pole or too space. How do you know those photo's are not fakes or that The Government is hiding this from us. You can't but common sense tells you that The Earth is round.

 

So why doesn't this apply to the moon.

i never admitted that the moon didnt exist.

 

 

i just asked how can you be certain we have been there.

 

 

if real proof is needed for other things, why cant the same arguement be used for the moon arguement.

 

 

 

granted i take up this arguement for the sake of arguement, but the thinking behind it remains the crux of my arguement.

I suspect this is tied into religion somehow?

if real proof is needed for other things, why cant the same arguement be used for the moon arguement.

 

 

 

granted i take up this arguement for the sake of arguement, but the thinking behind it remains the crux of my arguement.

The two issues are not related, I already replied to this issue:

 

If someone gave me undeniable photographic evidence of Jesus rising from the dead and audio of him saying exactly what he said in the bible, I would be a christian 100%. However, if one doubts the moon landing, we have to start doubting if the world is round, if france REALLY exists, and whether tom brokaw is a robot or not.

 

If you are trying to say that my logic is flawed because I believe in the moon landing and not other things, your assumption is ludicrous.