In all honesty, I was the first to make it a little personal. In my defense, I attacked SFan's arguments. Of course it's only a short slide to attacking him personally, because well....it's so damn easy.

While I feel that Bush is a better leader in the war against terrorism, the man has just made some plain stupid decisions in his four years in office.

 

 

It was 16-15 Bush, now its tied 16-16!

You go thanking the Republicans for that while I go and thank my friends in the Democratic party for keeping the longest running dictator in the world there for 45 years. At least the Republicans fixed their goof

 

 

 

:notworthy :notworthy :notworthy

In all honesty, I was the first to make it a little personal. In my defense, I attacked SFan's arguments. Of course it's only a short slide to attacking him personally, because well....it's so damn easy.

See, even he admits his lack of ability to convey his beliefs intelligently furman. So big surprise, you're wrong again.

if kerry wins the country will be weak again. being exposed to another terror attack. :thumbdown

How is Kerry weak on defense and Bush strong???? Funny, I thought that a guy that actually went to war and did not hide behind daddy's pants would be more proactive... But hey, that's just me. :mischief

if kerry wins the country will be weak again. being exposed to another terror attack. :thumbdown

How is Kerry weak on defense and Bush strong???? Funny, I thought that a guy that actually went to war and did not hide behind daddy's pants would be more proactive... But hey, that's just me. :mischief (Please correct me if I'm wrong here) But after Vietnam, wasn't John Kerry all about the anti-war rallies and anti-war everything?

ummm yeah.... So? He at least had the decency to fight for his country, whether he agreed with it or not.

if kerry wins the country will be weak again. being exposed to another terror attack. :thumbdown

How is Kerry weak on defense and Bush strong???? Funny, I thought that a guy that actually went to war and did not hide behind daddy's pants would be more proactive... But hey, that's just me. :mischief (Please correct me if I'm wrong here) But after Vietnam, wasn't John Kerry all about the anti-war rallies and anti-war everything? this is a hard question.

 

Who's going to be safer? The guy who works out, but makes enemies for no reason, or the weak guy who tries to stay out of people's way?

 

Bush's desire to make enemies is dangerous, but we do need a president willing to bomb Afghanistan and I give Bush credit for that.

this is a hard question.

 

Who's going to be safer? The guy who works out, but makes enemies for no reason, or the weak guy who tries to stay out of people's way?

 

Bush's desire to make enemies is dangerous, but we do need a president willing to bomb Afghanistan and I give Bush credit for that.

Once again... How is Kerry weak????

Is exageration something I just invented or are you not familiar with it.

 

Weak as in, not passing 400 billion dollar military measures. In reality, bush is weaker for defense with a bigger mroe expensive military.

Research your last statement... You may just find out that it is not as they make it look like.

 

I mean that you can not vote for something that is not economically feasible, but then again, more guns, more bombs is keepings way safer.... NOT!

kerry voted for the iraq war, but it is hard for anyone to out trump bush's military spending aside from reagan. end of story.

kerry voted for the iraq war, but it is hard for anyone to out trump bush's military spending aside from reagan. end of story.

I would have voted for the war too... back then, so would have you. That doesn't mean we can't come to our senses and feel betrayed by the big lie it is, right?

On the initial vote, yes. I laughed at the democrats flip flopping on the war issue and I came to the decision that with the north korea problem and weapons inspections in Iraq plus incurred costs of war, that the Iraq war would do more harm than good, so I turned against it.

saw on CNN today that 51% polled said they would vote for Bush. Kerry was 47%.

kerry voted for the iraq war, but it is hard for anyone to out trump bush's military spending aside from reagan. end of story.

I would have voted for the war too... back then, so would have you. That doesn't mean we can't come to our senses and feel betrayed by the big lie it is, right? ya cause according to bush the WMD existed in Iraq.

 

 

 

of course that was just a fabrication by Bush that he just seems to get away with.

kerry voted for the iraq war, but it is hard for anyone to out trump bush's military spending aside from reagan.? end of story.

I would have voted for the war too... back then, so would have you. That doesn't mean we can't come to our senses and feel betrayed by the big lie it is, right? ya cause according to bush the WMD existed in Iraq.

 

 

 

of course that was just a fabrication by Bush that he just seems to get away with. You see, this is the thing were moronic partisan s*** becomes more visible... It is ok for your president to lie, as long as he belongs to the party of your choosing...

 

I don't care what people's arguments are, Bush and his people lied to us and continue to do so... If we let them get away with this, then they can get away with absolutely anything... They could probably kill your mothers in front of you and you would believe their excuses for doing so. :no Democrat, Republican, Blue, Green or Yellow, when a president lies, he needs to be held accountable.

saw on CNN today that 51% polled said they would vote for Bush. Kerry was 47%.

not very surprising. 90% of America is moronic.

kerry voted for the iraq war, but it is hard for anyone to out trump bush's military spending aside from reagan.? end of story.

I would have voted for the war too... back then, so would have you. That doesn't mean we can't come to our senses and feel betrayed by the big lie it is, right? ya cause according to bush the WMD existed in Iraq.

 

 

 

of course that was just a fabrication by Bush that he just seems to get away with. You see, this is the thing were moronic partisan s*** becomes more visible... It is ok for your president to lie, as long as he belongs to the party of your choosing...

 

I don't care what people's arguments are, Bush and his people lied to us and continue to do so... If we let them get away with this, then they can get away with absolutely anything... They could probably kill your mothers in front of you and you would believe their excuses for doing so. :no Democrat, Republican, Blue, Green or Yellow, when a president lies, he needs to be held accountable. Exactly. that's why Bush jr., Reagan, and Clinton stink. But not nixon, I like his style.

In all honesty, I was the first to make it a little personal. In my defense, I attacked SFan's arguments. Of course it's only a short slide to attacking him personally, because well....it's so damn easy.

See, even he admits his lack of ability to convey his beliefs intelligently furman. So big surprise, you're wrong again. Dink. See what I said about it being easy? It's like debating Ann Coulter. Theoretically, it could be done. But honestly, what's the point?

Who's going to be safer? The guy who works out, but makes enemies for no reason, or the weak guy who tries to stay out of people's way?

 

Bush's desire to make enemies is dangerous, but we do need a president willing to bomb Afghanistan and I give Bush credit for that.

exactly, hes gonna p***y out and just lay back because hes anti millitary action. so he sits back and lets a problem develope into something big, instead of taking out the problem while its at a minimal.

 

yea, i might have to agree bush likes to create enemies. but hes creating the enemies before the enemies do. thats why i think the country would be weaker with kerry.

In all honesty, I was the first to make it a little personal. In my defense, I attacked SFan's arguments. Of course it's only a short slide to attacking him personally, because well....it's so damn easy.

See, even he admits his lack of ability to convey his beliefs intelligently furman. So big surprise, you're wrong again. Dink. See what I said about it being easy? It's like debating Ann Coulter. Theoretically, it could be done. But honestly, what's the point? Oh what a big man you are, hey let me buy you a pack of gum I'll show you how to chew it. I hope you leave enough room for my fist, because I'm going to ram it into your stomach and break your god damn spine.

 

Oh, I humiliated you, oh my God I'm sorry.

Who's going to be safer? The guy who works out, but makes enemies for no reason, or the weak guy who tries to stay out of people's way?

 

Bush's desire to make enemies is dangerous, but we do need a president willing to bomb Afghanistan and I give Bush credit for that.

exactly, hes gonna p***y out and just lay back because hes anti millitary action. so he sits back and lets a problem develope into something big, instead of taking out the problem while its at a minimal.

 

yea, i might have to agree bush likes to create enemies. but hes creating the enemies before the enemies do. thats why i think the country would be weaker with kerry. 1. Kerry voted for your USELESS WAR

 

2. MAKING ENEMIES is not a good thing and the precedent Bush sets is far more dangerous for the country.

Hey, thats an arnold line

 

 

Its kinda funny how our little board mirrors the political polls currently out...Kerry will lose because of people like me who will vote for Nader. :lol

Yeah, it's al pacino and arnold combined, but Rippyo is unable to handle anything intelligent so I just replied to him in an rambling incoherent idiotic matter: rippyo style. Plus, move quotes are funny.

 

Vote libertarian...you know you want to...