Boog Sciambi Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 what bulllllllshiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. somoene is on drugs...they have.... The Fish can only hope this will be the year when Josh Beckett finally puts together a dynamite full season. (Last week's ranking: 5) 13. Florida (5-4) (.556) 12. St. Louis (3-4) (.429) (Last Week: 6) 11. Baltimore (5-3) (.625) (Last Week: 17) 10. San Francisco (4-4) (.500) (Last Week: 15) 9. New York Yankees (4-4) (.500) (Last Week: 1) 8. Minnesota (5-3) (.625) (Last Week: 4) 7. Boston (3-5) (.375) (Last Week: 2) 6. Toronto (6-3) (.667) (Last Week: 20) 5. Milwaukee (5-3) (.625) (Last Week: 23) 4. Chicago White Sox (6-2) (.750) (Last Week: 22) 3. Los Angeles (6-2) (.750) (Last Week: 18) 2. Philadelphia (4-5) (.444) (Last Week: 12) 1. Atlanta (5-4)(.556) (Last Week: 3) it really makes me wonder who gets paid to do this, especially when 5 of the 13 teams have less than the marlins win percentage and aparently these stats are completly oblivioius to pitching of any kind. uggh, whatever. no dap as always for the fish.. let them go out there and prove everyone wrong again link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Juanky Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Nine games man, nine games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshFish Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 is not like this have anything to do with the REAL season standings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boog Sciambi Posted April 14, 2005 Author Share Posted April 14, 2005 is not like this have anything to do with the REAL season standings 741744[/snapback] but you'd think it'd reflect them in some form Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I dont see how this is bulls*** we are 5-4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Juanky Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 The only pick that baffles me there really is the Phillies at 2. They dropped a series to us, didn't they also drop one to the Nationals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boog Sciambi Posted April 14, 2005 Author Share Posted April 14, 2005 The only pick that baffles me there really is the Phillies at 2. They dropped a series to us, didn't they also drop one to the Nationals? 741747[/snapback] yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshFish Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I dont see how this is bulls*** we are 5-4 741746[/snapback] agree, but what about Atlanta at #1 with the same 5-4? That's outrageous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boog Sciambi Posted April 14, 2005 Author Share Posted April 14, 2005 I dont see how this is bulls*** we are 5-4 741746[/snapback] with a better record than 5 of the 12 other teams there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 you guys overreact to this stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boog Sciambi Posted April 14, 2005 Author Share Posted April 14, 2005 you guys overreact to this stuff 741753[/snapback] no one is overreacting, its just a number by some stupid idiot that gets paid to make stuff up. but it'd be nice for once if they weren't on drugs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 you guys overreact to this stuff 741753[/snapback] no one is overreacting, its just a number by some stupid idiot that gets paid to make stuff up. but it'd be nice for once if they weren't on drugs. 741754[/snapback] sounds like you are overreacting :mischief Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshFish Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 you guys overreact to this stuff 741753[/snapback] no one is overreacting, its just a number by some stupid idiot that gets paid to make stuff up. but it'd be nice for once if they weren't on drugs. 741754[/snapback] this is probably some kind of computer program doing the ranking and someone justifying it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boog Sciambi Posted April 14, 2005 Author Share Posted April 14, 2005 1 Atlanta Braves 7 Pitching and defense always help in beating the teams you should beat. 2 Chicago White Sox 17 Impressive start vs. top division foes. Following Braves' pitching-and-defense lead. 3 Boston Red Sox 2 Curt Schilling is coming back Wednesday, so defending champs don't deserve to drop far. 4 New York Yankees 1 Jaret Wright looked very unworthy of that much money, but he should rebound. 5 Florida Marlins 6 The starters' ERA rose to 1.59 after Monday night's loss to the Phillies. CBS Sportsline Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I dont see how this is bulls*** we are 5-4 741746[/snapback] So is Atlanta. They're number one. :plain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuickGold Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 These rankings are based on talent, I believe. Not record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 These rankings are based on talent, I believe. Not record. 741778[/snapback] IMO the Marlins have just as much or more talent than any team in baseball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMarlinsWinThe Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I could see why the Braves, Dodgers, and White Sox are ranked ahead of us, but I don't understand why we're lower than 4 or 5.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Juanky Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 These rankings are based on talent, I believe. Not record. 741778[/snapback] 4. Chicago White Sox (6-2) (.750) (Last Week: 22) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuickGold Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 These rankings are based on talent, I believe. Not record. 741778[/snapback] 4. Chicago White Sox (6-2) (.750) (Last Week: 22) 741791[/snapback] :blink: Then I suppose there is no basis for these rankings beyond personal opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianFishFan Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Ok this is obviously a joke. The brewers and Jays are right at the top. They might have won a few games but they are not more talented than the teams underneath of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolando8291 Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I dont see how this is bulls*** we are 5-4 741746[/snapback] and so are the braves and look where their ranked...plus we got the best pitching staff in baseball right now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fritz Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 These rankings are based on talent, I believe. Not record. 741778[/snapback] IMO the Marlins have just as much or more talent than any team in baseball. 741783[/snapback] Red Sox Yankees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boog Sciambi Posted April 14, 2005 Author Share Posted April 14, 2005 These rankings are based on talent, I believe. Not record. 741778[/snapback] IMO the Marlins have just as much or more talent than any team in baseball. 741783[/snapback] Red Sox Yankees 741844[/snapback] exactly, nothing but a joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I dont see how this is bulls*** we are 5-4 741746[/snapback] and so are the braves and look where their ranked...plus we got the best pitching staff in baseball right now... 741828[/snapback] That was my point... The Braves and Marlins share the same record, but there's no WAY the Braves are playing anywhere near the level of the Marlins at this point in time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.