July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail.
July 22, 200521 yr Damn kids. 869535[/snapback] :lol :lol :lol Now you are using the "they're kids" argument to discredit us. :lol :lol :lol Most of us are 16+. Lame.
July 22, 200521 yr Damn kids. 869535[/snapback] :lol :lol :lol Now you are using the "they're kids" argument to discredit us. :lol :lol :lol Most of us are 16+. Lame. 869543[/snapback] Sorry, it wasn't for you. You aren't being an ass at all. You are stating your points in a positive manner. I respect that.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper.
July 22, 200521 yr Damn kids. 869535[/snapback] :lol :lol :lol Now you are using the "they're kids" argument to discredit us. :lol :lol :lol Most of us are 16+. Lame. 869543[/snapback] Sorry, it wasn't for you. You aren't being an ass at all. You are stating your points in a positive manner. I respect that. 869544[/snapback] Yeah, those damn MPs too! Who do they think they are to tell us liberals love terrorists? Maybe they should open their minds. Hmm what an idea!
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense.
July 22, 200521 yr Damn kids. 869535[/snapback] :lol :lol :lol Now you are using the "they're kids" argument to discredit us. :lol :lol :lol Most of us are 16+. Lame. 869543[/snapback] Sorry, it wasn't for you. You aren't being an ass at all. You are stating your points in a positive manner. I respect that. 869544[/snapback] Yeah, those damn MPs too! Who do they think they are to tell us liberals love terrorists? Maybe they should open their minds. Hmm what an idea! 869549[/snapback] Shut up, kid. You have obviously not listened to a word I have said. You are just out to cause problems.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense. 869550[/snapback] Only in your world, it does.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense. 869550[/snapback] Only in your world, it does. 869552[/snapback] I don't think I am the only person that wants terrorists off the streets.
July 22, 200521 yr BTW, MarlinsFan, I respect that you are in the army but for christ sakes, when you attack the views held by many on this board like that, you should expect some backlash. This isn't the Ann Coulter fan club, though Chewbacca would beg to differ.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense. 869550[/snapback] How does this little story of yours end up with you essentially calling liberals terrorist-loving? You need to get out of Kalamazoo more often.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense. 869550[/snapback] Only in your world, it does. 869552[/snapback] I don't think I am the only person that wants terrorists off the streets. 869553[/snapback] You were talking about your previous comments. You used that to backup your claim that liberals love terrorists. :thumbup
July 22, 200521 yr BTW, MarlinsFan, I respect that you are in the army but for christ sakes, when you attack the views held by many on this board like that, you should expect some backlash. This isn't the Ann Coulter fan club, though Chewbacca would beg to differ. 869554[/snapback] I've never read any of her books and I doubt I ever will.
July 22, 200521 yr BTW, MarlinsFan, I respect that you are in the army but for christ sakes, when you attack the views held by many on this board like that, you should expect some backlash. This isn't the Ann Coulter fan club, though Chewbacca would beg to differ. 869554[/snapback] I've never read any of her books and I doubt I ever will. 869559[/snapback] You sure same to share many of her views.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense. 869550[/snapback] Only in your world, it does. 869552[/snapback] I don't think I am the only person that wants terrorists off the streets. 869553[/snapback] You were talking about your previous comments. You used that to backup your claim that liberals love terrorists. :thumbup 869557[/snapback] I do not think nor have I ever thought that liberals love terrorists. Think about how stupid it would be for anyone to believe that... unless of course we are referring to liberals from Uzhbekistan(sp?) or something. They might.
July 22, 200521 yr BTW, MarlinsFan, I respect that you are in the army but for christ sakes, when you attack the views held by many on this board like that, you should expect some backlash. This isn't the Ann Coulter fan club, though Chewbacca would beg to differ. 869554[/snapback] I've never read any of her books and I doubt I ever will. 869559[/snapback] You sure same to share many of her views. 869562[/snapback] No she is way overboard. I have seen one of her books called "Liberal Treachery from Vietnam to the GWOT" Something like that. If that book stays true to its title, I'd have to believe she is just out to pull a McCarthy.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense. 869550[/snapback] Only in your world, it does. 869552[/snapback] I don't think I am the only person that wants terrorists off the streets. 869553[/snapback] You were talking about your previous comments. You used that to backup your claim that liberals love terrorists. :thumbup 869557[/snapback] I do not think nor have I ever thought that liberals love terrorists. Think about how stupid it would be for anyone to believe that... unless of course we are referring to liberals from Uzhbekistan(sp?) or something. They might. 869563[/snapback] And this just keeps getting better and better.
July 22, 200521 yr You are all just as crooked as Bush twisting things to manipulate the truth.? It is sick.? Wake yourselves up. 869501[/snapback] You must think you're really special. Here's a clue....you're not. 869505[/snapback] I don't. I am just surprised that none of you are even making an attempt to really see what I was trying to say or to halt with the rude sarcasm. You are so determined to interpret what I was saying in a certain way that you wouldn't even listen to an explanation. 869511[/snapback] It's not rude sarcasm. If everything that goes against what you say rude? Do you have to whine in every thread about other people being "rude"? It's a political forum. This is where we debate political views. People were just ripping your narrow mindedness when it comes to this political view. Then they were ripping the way you backtracked. Take the heat like a man, and stop throwing the rude argument out there. 869520[/snapback] I'm narrow-minded because I disagreed with them? That makes no sense. And yes, sarcasm is rude. There are much more appropriate ways to argue political points than to exaggerate people's words and accuse them of drinking "conservative Koolaid". I guess I should stop cutting people slack on these boards all the time because you people never return the favor. As the detainees would say, "You have black hearts." 869525[/snapback] No..... This is why we are calling you narrow-minded: Yeah, liberals, free them all! Put them back on the streets! tsk tsk. I know, don't worry. There is just a lot of pressure from liberals to close the place down and I have heard from many people that they should be set free. Obviously, very ignorant people with a naive view of the world. Human or not, we can't feel sorry for terrorists. We must constantly remind ourselves of what they have done and what they will continue to do. When you started to get fried you started to backtrack. 869539[/snapback] No, when I cooled down after reading about the bombings, I just explained what I really meant by my original post or how I really feel about it. It was a rash statement made in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to go into detail. When people started to see it to mean more than it did, then I decided to go into detail. 869542[/snapback] :plain The hole gets deeper. 869547[/snapback] I don't see how. The bombings triggered a memory of an article I read showing pictures of people from England protesting GTMO. So my natural reaction to that was, "See, we need a place to keep these crazy guys." So it boggled my mind why anyone would want to set them free. It all makes perfect sense. 869550[/snapback] Only in your world, it does. 869552[/snapback] I don't think I am the only person that wants terrorists off the streets. 869553[/snapback] You were talking about your previous comments. You used that to backup your claim that liberals love terrorists. :thumbup 869557[/snapback] I do not think nor have I ever thought that liberals love terrorists. Think about how stupid it would be for anyone to believe that... unless of course we are referring to liberals from Uzhbekistan(sp?) or something. They might. 869563[/snapback] And this just keeps getting better and better. 869566[/snapback] Oh come on. There is nothing to be upset about in that. A lot of the Muslims from Uz. tend to be more liberal with their beliefs, but some still participate in radical violent behavior. It's rare.
July 22, 200521 yr 253 just shut up before you fall through the Earth. :thumbup 869571[/snapback] Sheesh. Umm... :dancing
July 22, 200521 yr Seriously. I can't even throw out the cliche "quit while your ahead" because your way the hell behind. Can we just start over? I'm sure we'd all be better for it. We all say stupid s*** sometimes and god knows I'm guilty of it plenty. Let's just kill this thread and pretend it didn't happen.
July 22, 200521 yr Seriously. I can't even throw out the cliche "quit while your ahead" because your way the hell behind. Can we just start over? I'm sure we'd all be better for it. We all say stupid s*** sometimes and god knows I'm guilty of it plenty. Let's just kill this thread and pretend it didn't happen. 869579[/snapback] Yeah I should be allowed to speak out of my ass at least once every few weeks. :mischief
July 22, 200521 yr I tend to get out of hand whenever I get angry about something. I never give myself enough time to cool down before opening my fat mouth, then I just say stuff I don't really mean. It's a typical excuse used with girlfriends, but it is true.
July 22, 200521 yr I tend to get out of hand whenever I get angry about something. I never give myself enough time to cool down before opening my fat mouth, then I just say stuff I don't really mean. It's a typical excuse used with girlfriends, but it is true. 869583[/snapback] You're human afterall.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.