October 13, 200521 yr Look I know im gonna get blown up for saying this but over the course of a 162 game schedule you can't underachieve you are as good as your record says you are listen I am dissapointed in thier season but you can not say they underachieved
October 13, 200521 yr So Lowell hitting only 6 HRs with a sub-.300 OBP, Pierre having an off year, Leiter sucking, poor bullpen management, and declining power numbers from Seabass isn't underachieving? You've got to put that on Robinson and Jack.
October 13, 200521 yr Having the best batting average in the National League, while having the worst average close and late is not underacheiving? Then what is?
October 13, 200521 yr ******THEY UNDERACHIEVED******* *******THEY WERE PICKED TO WIN THE DIVISION******* ******THEY HAD A BETTER TEAM OVERALL THIS YEAR THAN LAST YEAR AND STILL HAD SAME RECORD******** ....end of News Ticker
October 13, 200521 yr Look I know im gonna get blown up for saying this but over the course of a 162 game schedule you can't underachieve you are as good as your record says you are listen I am dissapointed in thier season but you can not say they underachieved I have some ocean front property in arizona and moon rocks in the backyard. Would you like to buy?
October 13, 200521 yr Author So Lowell hitting only 6 HRs with a sub-.300 OBP, Pierre having an off year, Leiter sucking, poor bullpen management, and declining power numbers from Seabass isn't underachieving? You've got to put that on Robinson and Jack. yes it isnt because over 162 games you are as good as your record says you are!!!! and looking GREAT on paper does not make you a GREAT team it just means you have a lot of good players this team played to its level period
October 13, 200521 yr So Lowell hitting only 6 HRs with a sub-.300 OBP, Pierre having an off year, Leiter sucking, poor bullpen management, and declining power numbers from Seabass isn't underachieving? You've got to put that on Robinson and Jack. yes it isnt because over 162 games you are as good as your record says you are!!!! and looking GREAT on paper does not make you a GREAT team it just means you have a lot of good players this team played to its level period No it didn't. Mike Lowell and Pierre has subpar seasons. If they have average seasons this team has a lot better record. This is by far the dumbest excuse for why this team played the way it did.
October 13, 200521 yr Author Its not an excuse i posted this because i am tired of making excuses of ehy this team played poorly
October 13, 200521 yr Its not an excuse i posted this because i am tired of making excuses of ehy this team played poorly Most of the excuses are valid.
October 13, 200521 yr Also, Dook had a power outage(not as noticable as Mikey and Seabass, but he still did), and got hurt towards the end, Luiy was hurt a good portion of the season, Easley got hurt towards the end, Gonzalez had that sore elbow which affected not only his bat but also his defense.
October 13, 200521 yr This is the most ridiculous thread ever. The Marlins didn't underachieve? Okay, and Miguel Cabrera doesn't speak Spanish. Anyone in the organization would tell you they underachieved. I'll give you three guesses as to why that is. (Hint: because they did)
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.