Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

MarlinsBaseball.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Why Blalock and not this guy?

Featured Replies

Texiera is untouchable so im not even gonna go there but why not a package of Michael Young, and either Danks or Diamond for Beckett and Lowell? Texas has a very good prospect at SS in Arias and has Kisler who can play SS right now. Marlins biggest need right now IMO is SS and Michael Young is a top 5 SS in the game. So why no Young? Well what this does is tell me that the Marlins plan on dealing Blalock to another ball club for other pieces. Ex: Blalock and a prospect or something to the Twins for Juan Rincon, Boof Bonser, Travis Bowyer? I don't know but things don't add up. Blalock is best suited at 3B and so is Miguel Cabrera and I don't think Blalock is winning that war and pushing Cabs back to LF where he has said he is uncomfortable and prefers not to play.

 

With all that being said I rather keep Beckett and see if Lowell turns it around. Probably doubtful but is dealing Lowell worth Beckett?

Blalock is better. I'd rather get him and then trade him for a starting pitcher.

 

Blalock is not better than Young. It's really not even close considering Young is a SS and Blalock is a 3rd baseman. I would think Young is untouchable.

Blalock is better. I'd rather get him and then trade him for a starting pitcher.

 

 

Young is considerably better than Mr. Blalock. Young is a top 5 SS and the Rangers would be crazy to deal him.

 

Young's away stats:

 

2003: .262/.291/.367

2004: .280/.320/.460

2005: .330/.384/.500

 

Blalock's away stats:

 

2003: .260/.301/.435

2004: .239/.323/.460

2005: .231/.276/.335

 

If we could switch Young and Blalock in that supposed deal, I would be absolutely thrilled.

Michael Young is four years older than Blalock. Blalock has a higher ceiling.

 

I'd still take Young over Blalock. I mean how many good hitting SS's are there in the league, and how many good hitting 3rd baseman in the league? Take into account that our best player is a 3rd baseman, and the fact that our Starting SS is a free agent well, you get the picture.

Michael Young is four years older than Blalock. Blalock has a higher ceiling.

 

One is regressing. The other is progressing. Just admit you're wrong, good sir.

The plan would be to turn around and trade Blalock anyways, so it doesn't really matter. The article on MLB.COM reported this.

Michael Young is four years older than Blalock. Blalock has a higher ceiling.

 

One is regressing. The other is progressing. Just admit you're wrong, good sir.

 

I like Blalock more. We can disagree. It's okay, good sir.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.