September 5, 200322 yr PLAYER W - L - T - Pct. - +/- 83Gator 170 - 86 - 0 - .664 - (+84) Das Texan 164 - 91 - 0 - .643 - (+73) Big Hugg 161 - 95 - 0 - .629 - (+66) DaGreatOne 160 - 96 - 0 - .625 - (+64) Dante_evil 153 - 103 - 0 - .598 - (+50) Marlins Phenom 152 - 103 - 0 - .596 - (+49) Ramp 151 - 104 - 0 - .592 - (+47) Phlub 148 - 80 - 0 - .649 - (+68) Admin 148 - 108 - 0 - .578 - (+40) MaXx 146 - 96 - 0 - .603 - (+50) Alkazoid 114 - 58 - 0 - .663 - (+56) Mikebball 108 - 69 - 0 - .610 - (+39) LCastillo 108 - 100 - 0 - .519 - (+8) Oheeoh?magglio 106 - 62 - 0 - .631 - (+44) GiantsIn04 104 - 50 - 0 - .675 - (+54) Sals 72 - 44 - 0 - .621 - (+28) Marlins2002 71 - 44 - 0 - .617 - (+27) Super Angels 70 - 40 - 0 - .636 - (+30) D-Train35 68 - 33 - 0 - .673 - (+35) MarlinDude 66 - 38 - 0 - .635 - (+28) RippyO 66 - 42 - 0 - .600 - (+24) KJC 62 - 30 - 0 - .674 - (+32) Marlins02 62 - 40 - 0 - .608 - (+22) ComebacKids04 55 - 25 - 0 - .688 - (+30) Pierre4prez 51 - 37 - 0 - .580 - (+14) Future GM 45 - 19 - 0 - .703 - (+26) SlapHands69 44 - 44 - 0 - .500 - (0) Rune 40 - 32 - 0 - .556 - (+12) ChiSox Man 39 - 25 - 0 - .609 - (+14) Joe 33 - 27 - 0 - .550 - (+6) Juanky 32 - 28 - 0 - .533 - (+4) MiggysLadi20 27 - 21 - 0 - .563 - (+6) FurmanGator 26 - 20 - 0 - .565 - (+6) Heckeroo 23 - 9 - 0 - .719 - (+14) Marlins 16 - 12 - 0 - .571 - (+4) Mr. Bandwagon 16 - 16 - 0 - .500 - (0) Willis04MVP 11 - 5 - 0 - .686 - (+6) Capefish 10 - 4 - 0 - .714 - (+6) Yankeefan21 9 - 7 - 0 - .563 - (+2) UdderlySexyCows 9 - 7 - 0 - .563 - (+2) Bryan 9 - 7 - 0 - .563 - (+2) Willis #1 8 - 6 - 0 - .571 - (+2) minus 8 - 8 - 0 - .500 - (0) Odom 006 7 - 7 - 0 - .500 - (0) DjCaliente007 3 - 7 - 0 - .300 - (-4) # of Wins determines these standings. Winning Percentage will only be used as a reference or tie-breaker, not for overall standings. Standings as of 12/30/03
September 10, 200322 yr Cgator you have me at 12-3, I should be 13-3 now that Tampa won last night. Also DTrain35 is missing a game.
September 10, 200322 yr You definitely just edited your post and added the 16th game. Well this prediction business sure is easy when you make one after the game is played. :whistle
September 10, 200322 yr Cgator you have me at 12-3, I should be 13-3 now that Tampa won last night. Also DTrain35 is missing a game. You did not predict the Broncos-Bengals game, because I copied and pasted from you and was PMed reminding me to write it on. This is fact.
September 16, 200322 yr Yeah, I should have an extra loss becuase you messed up on my total for week 2, Philly lost and you marked that it was correct.
September 17, 200322 yr Author Yeah, I should have an extra loss becuase you messed up on my total for week 2, Philly lost and you marked that it was correct. Corrected. Thanks.
October 14, 200322 yr Author After week 6, it looks as though Das has gained the slimmest of margins over 83Gator. But that can change with just a few picks in week 7. Just have to mention that Marlins2002 went 13-1 for week 6, the best one week record so far this season :thumbup
October 14, 200322 yr After week 6, it looks as though Das has gained the slimmest of margins over 83Gator. But that can change with just a few picks in week 7. Just have to mention that Marlins2002 went 13-1 for week 6, the best one week record so far this season :thumbup Damn those Bills. They suck worse then I thought . All in all my best week this year :cool
October 19, 200322 yr I'm still in the top 3 though in Winning Percentage meaning I've picked most of my games correct, 3rd best of them all. I just don't have the amount of wins because I had to move across town in week 3. But if those counted it would have hurted my WP%. So 3rd place is still a little low for where I expected to be but I'll get it up yet.
October 21, 200322 yr Author And whatever breathing room Das had after week 6 has evaporated. Once again we have a tie heading into week 8.
October 28, 200322 yr Author After week 8, 83Gator takes over the top spot by the slimmest of margins.
October 28, 200322 yr another way to keep both accuracy and # of correct picks is subract the amount of losses from the amount of wins. Here's what the standings would look like: PLAYER W - L - T - GB - Pct. 83Gator +42 Das Texan +40 DaGreatOne +36 Big Hugg +36 D-Train35 +35 Marlins2002 +29 Ramp +28 Sals +28 Phlub +28 Mikebball +26 MaXxnMaRi +24 Marlins02 +18 Alkazoid +18 Marlins Phenom +17 MarlinDude +16 Pierre4prez +14 Dante_evil +10 Rune +8 KoolianoJayCubano +8 GiantsIn04 +8 Joe +6 FurmanGator +6 Capefish +6 Juanky +4 Oheeoh?magglio +4 Marlins +4 LCastillo +2 Yankeefan21 +2 UdderlySexyCows +2 Bryan +2 Willis #1 +2 Admin 0 SlapHands69 0 minus 0 Odom 006 0
October 29, 200322 yr I'm still in the top 3 though in Winning Percentage meaning I've picked most of my games correct, 3rd best of them all. I just don't have the amount of wins because I had to move across town in week 3. But if those counted it would have hurted my WP%. So 3rd place is still a little low for where I expected to be but I'll get it up yet. love the humility Wildcard in green and yellow
October 29, 200322 yr Interesting. Like the take away/give away stats. that way it takes both winning percentage and total wins in account
November 6, 200322 yr 83Gator +40 Das Texan +40 D-Train35 +35 DaGreatOne +34 Big Hugg +32 Phlub +30 Ramp +28 Sals +28 Marlins2002 +27 Marlins Phenom +15 MaXxnMaRi +22 Alkazoid +22 Mikebball +20 Marlins02 +18 MarlinDude +16 Pierre4prez +14 GiantsIn04 +10 Dante_evil +8 LCastillo +8 Rune +8 KoolianoJayCubano +8 Joe +6 FurmanGator +6 Oheeoh?magglio +6 Capefish +6 Juanky +4 Marlins +4 RippyO +4 Yankeefan21 +2 UdderlySexyCows +2 Bryan +2 Willis #1 +2 SlapHands69 0 minus 0 Odom 006 0 Admin -4
November 11, 200322 yr Author Looks as though its still neck and neck at the top of the heap after week 10.
November 11, 200322 yr cgator, i just looked at the standings, and GB is not calculated properly. each win constitutes an additional half a game, and each loss constitutes the loss of half a game. the GB that is calculated up there is correct for people who have picks for every game (i.e. those who have played since week 1), but it was calculated incorrectly for those who have fewer than the maximum amount of picks. for example, 83gator is 93-51. if a new person is at 0-0, they have 93 fewer wins (93/2 = 46.5 points behind) but 51 fewer losses (25.5 points ahead). correctly calculated, the new person is thus 21 Games Back (46.5 - 25.5 = 21 GB). although GB should theoretically be a measure of how many wins a team needs to tie for a lead, in actuality it is just a mathematical win/loss formula calculated as above. if you look at division standings in a particular sport, a team with a record of 93-52 is 0.5 games behind a team with a record with 93-51. to avoid having to recalculate GB the hard way, you can simply divide everyone takeaway+/- points by 2, then subtract each person's value from the high score (in this case, one-half of 42 = 21) to calculate GB. for dagreatone: 21 - 16 = 5. so dagreatone is correctly 5 GB, since he played the same number of games as 83gator and das texan. essentially, GB corrects for a difference in number of "games played". of course, if you're basing the game on # of wins, as i'm assuming you are, then just leave the standings are they are and remove the reference to GB (or recalculate it for reference). ok, i hope this is of some use to you. i'm a numbers fiend, so i just thought i'd point out that GB is calculated incorrectly here.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.