November 29, 200619 yr If we keep him we better get a Helms type to platoon with him and/or start there in case he hurts himself again. If he can be packaged for a good CF (Baldelli)...do it. If we're thinking of trading him for a Duffy type...do not...unless we're getting a reliever as well. I don't see Mike getting much better, but with a platoon partner like Helms our 1B situation isn't a weakness. still I dont want a plantoon at 1B Why not ?
November 29, 200619 yr If we keep him we better get a Helms type to platoon with him and/or start there in case he hurts himself again. If he can be packaged for a good CF (Baldelli)...do it. If we're thinking of trading him for a Duffy type...do not...unless we're getting a reliever as well. I don't see Mike getting much better, but with a platoon partner like Helms our 1B situation isn't a weakness. still I dont want a plantoon at 1B Why not ? I am not just a fan of it personally. I would like to be able to find an every day player at 1B (a lacking of defense position for the NL with LF) that can get the job done there. I think 1B is a position that is made for a big time bat to help the team there. I accept though that others have different opinions there.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.