November 13, 200718 yr Mike Jacobs to the Twins for Matt Garza. The Twins have too many starting pitchers and that's a nice problem to have and they appear willing to move Garza. The Twins need hitting really bad and Jacobs would fit in as their DH. The Marlins could then move Willingham to first base where he defense wouldn't hurt near as much as it does in LF. Makes way too much sense for both teams.
November 13, 200718 yr I think the Twins can do better than Mike Jacobs for Matt Garza. Edit: which means the trade doesn't really make sense. Edit: at all.
November 13, 200718 yr Author I think the Twins can do better than Mike Jacobs for Matt Garza. Edit: which means the trade doesn't really make sense. Edit: at all. Maybe then can and maybe they can't. Garza hasn't really proven much at the major league level.
November 13, 200718 yr Mike Jacobs to the Twins for Matt Garza. The Twins have too many starting pitchers and that's a nice problem to have and they appear willing to move Garza. The Twins need hitting really bad and Jacobs would fit in as their DH. The Marlins could then move Willingham to first base where he defense wouldn't hurt near as much as it does in LF. Makes way too much sense for both teams. Would the Twins want Mike Jacobs? They have Morneau and Kubel
November 13, 200718 yr Author Mike Jacobs to the Twins for Matt Garza. The Twins have too many starting pitchers and that's a nice problem to have and they appear willing to move Garza. The Twins need hitting really bad and Jacobs would fit in as their DH. The Marlins could then move Willingham to first base where he defense wouldn't hurt near as much as it does in LF. Makes way too much sense for both teams. Would the Twins want Mike Jacobs? They have Morneau and Kubel They are tilted to the left side. I wouldn't be against moving Willingham for Garza if they like him better.
November 13, 200718 yr I think the Twins can do better than Mike Jacobs for Matt Garza. Edit: which means the trade doesn't really make sense. Edit: at all. Maybe then can and maybe they can't. Garza hasn't really proven much at the major league level. Either has Mike Jacobs. Mike Jacobs is a an often injured, poor defensive fielding first baseman who hasn't put up very good numbers save for one 30 game stint with the Mets. Matt Garza is a cost controlled pitcher who has potential and put up decent numbers in his short time in the majors. Teams don't give that up for mediocre hitting DH's.
November 13, 200718 yr Author I think the Twins can do better than Mike Jacobs for Matt Garza. Edit: which means the trade doesn't really make sense. Edit: at all. Maybe then can and maybe they can't. Garza hasn't really proven much at the major league level. Either has Mike Jacobs. Mike Jacobs is a an often injured, poor defensive fielding first baseman who hasn't put up very good numbers save for one 30 game stint with the Mets. Matt Garza is a cost controlled pitcher who has potential and put up decent numbers in his short time in the majors. Teams don't give that up for mediocre hitting DH's. I'm not saying Jacobs is a great hitter. But if he stays healthy he would hit 25-30 homers and DHing would help him stay in one piece. The Twins are desperate for hitting with Hunter leaving and the black hole they have at 2B and 3B.
November 17, 200718 yr Mike Jacobs to the Twins for Matt Garza. The Twins have too many starting pitchers and that's a nice problem to have and they appear willing to move Garza. The Twins need hitting really bad and Jacobs would fit in as their DH. The Marlins could then move Willingham to first base where he defense wouldn't hurt near as much as it does in LF. Makes way too much sense for both teams. Would the Twins want Mike Jacobs? They have Morneau and Kubel They are tilted to the left side. I wouldn't be against moving Willingham for Garza if they like him better. You should be lit on fire for suggesting a willingham trade.
November 17, 200718 yr Mike Jacobs to the Twins for Matt Garza. The Twins have too many starting pitchers and that's a nice problem to have and they appear willing to move Garza. The Twins need hitting really bad and Jacobs would fit in as their DH. The Marlins could then move Willingham to first base where he defense wouldn't hurt near as much as it does in LF. Makes way too much sense for both teams. Would the Twins want Mike Jacobs? They have Morneau and Kubel They are tilted to the left side. I wouldn't be against moving Willingham for Garza if they like him better. You should be lit on fire for suggesting a willingham trade. :notworthy :lol
November 17, 200718 yr Mike Jacobs to the Twins for Matt Garza. The Twins have too many starting pitchers and that's a nice problem to have and they appear willing to move Garza. The Twins need hitting really bad and Jacobs would fit in as their DH. The Marlins could then move Willingham to first base where he defense wouldn't hurt near as much as it does in LF. Makes way too much sense for both teams. Would the Twins want Mike Jacobs? They have Morneau and Kubel They are tilted to the left side. I wouldn't be against moving Willingham for Garza if they like him better. You should be lit on fire for suggesting a willingham trade. hehe i dont know about being lit on fire but definately dont trade willingham, especially now with cabrera leaving. were gonna need power and hram is going to need protection if hes moved up to third in the order. it doesnt look like we are going to get any legitimate power prospects in return for cabs so we need the hammer right now.
November 18, 200718 yr Why does it make so much sense for the Marlins to trade anybody they have for Matt Garza all of a sudden? Lets make any deal we can for Garza before the rest of league realizes how much sense it makes.
November 19, 200718 yr so miggy for garza straight up before anyone realizes were fleecing the twins that will solve all our problems
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.