November 19, 200916 yr Is it a guarantee that Uggla will be gone? Because otherwise having a guy like Carroll as a Utility IF really isnt a bad thing at all.
November 19, 200916 yr Is it a guarantee that Uggla will be gone? Because otherwise having a guy like Carroll as a Utility IF really isnt a bad thing at all.
November 19, 200916 yr Is it a guarantee that Uggla will be gone? Because otherwise having a guy like Carroll as a Utility IF really isnt a bad thing at all. The FO said they would hold on to Uggla if they aren't getting the type of return they want for him. Saw that on MLBTR earlier today. I doubt it is true. Probably just trying to up the ante for Uggs.
November 19, 200916 yr Is it a guarantee that Uggla will be gone? Because otherwise having a guy like Carroll as a Utility IF really isnt a bad thing at all. The FO said they would hold on to Uggla if they aren't getting the type of return they want for him. Saw that on MLBTR earlier today. I doubt it is true. Probably just trying to up the ante for Uggs.
November 20, 200916 yr ewskuytrghtuyrgjiotyrsz I literally spent a full minute trying to see if this was an encripted message.
November 20, 200916 yr ewskuytrghtuyrgjiotyrsz I literally spent a full minute trying to see if this was an encripted message.
November 20, 200916 yr ewskuytrghtuyrgjiotyrsz I literally spent a full minute trying to see if this was an encripted message. Haha. Nothing remotely as clever.
November 20, 200916 yr ewskuytrghtuyrgjiotyrsz I literally spent a full minute trying to see if this was an encripted message. Haha. Nothing remotely as clever.
November 20, 200916 yr well if we sign josh johnson to an extension and keep cody around i can honestly say that would make this off-season much better than other ones in the past
November 20, 200916 yr well if we sign josh johnson to an extension and keep cody around i can honestly say that would make this off-season much better than other ones in the past
November 20, 200916 yr Is it a guarantee that Uggla will be gone? Because otherwise having a guy like Carroll as a Utility IF really isnt a bad thing at all. The FO said they would hold on to Uggla if they aren't getting the type of return they want for him. Saw that on MLBTR earlier today. I doubt it is true. Probably just trying to up the ante for Uggs. That's my point. If we were to keep Uggla, I rather have Carroll as a UIF than Bonerface.
November 20, 200916 yr Is it a guarantee that Uggla will be gone? Because otherwise having a guy like Carroll as a Utility IF really isnt a bad thing at all. The FO said they would hold on to Uggla if they aren't getting the type of return they want for him. Saw that on MLBTR earlier today. I doubt it is true. Probably just trying to up the ante for Uggs. That's my point. If we were to keep Uggla, I rather have Carroll as a UIF than Bonerface.
November 20, 200916 yr Amezaga doesn't appear to be playing (yet) in Mexico and I don't know if that's because his recovery has slowed or he's going to join his club late for other reasons as a number of players do in winter ball. I'd feel badly for the guy if his career has been thwarted by getting hurt, if he's not playing here in 2010 I hope he's playing somewhere. The Carroll talk may be nothing (at this point my thinking) or it may be indicative of something else.
November 20, 200916 yr Amezaga doesn't appear to be playing (yet) in Mexico and I don't know if that's because his recovery has slowed or he's going to join his club late for other reasons as a number of players do in winter ball. I'd feel badly for the guy if his career has been thwarted by getting hurt, if he's not playing here in 2010 I hope he's playing somewhere. The Carroll talk may be nothing (at this point my thinking) or it may be indicative of something else.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.