June 12, 201016 yr the real thing that bothered me tonight was that hanley was 0 for 4 which i guess is good that the offense picked him up. there were 13 runs scored after his sac fly in the first and he drive in none of those. he is not hitting .278.....thats another big problem
June 12, 201016 yr A Stanton article is headlining the MLB section on ESPN right now. Just thought I'd point out this rare phenomena.
June 12, 201016 yr Tommy and Rich were right on the money: I've never felt so negative after a Marlins win. F*** this bullpen. Seriously. :banghead
June 12, 201016 yr Fun Fact Both Coghlan and Hanley are batting .278 right now. A month ago... Coghlan: .209 Hanley: .288 As happy as I am that we have our 2nd-half of '09 Cogs back, Hanley isn't looking like a star of this team by a long shot.
June 12, 201016 yr Fun Fact Both Coghlan and Hanley are batting .278 right now. A month ago... Coghlan: .209 Hanley: .288 As happy as I am that we have our 2nd-half of '09 Cogs back, Hanley isn't looking like a star of this team by a long shot. You don't really have to go that far back, Hanley was hitting .302 on the 28th but in the last 10 games he's hitting .178. It's a 12 game slump.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.