Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

MarlinsBaseball.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Oakland Interested in Redman

Featured Replies

The A's have reportedly talked to the Marlins about a Mark Redman trade. They'd probably give up pitching prospects (not Joe Blanton) for Redman, who is due at least $3 million in arbitration. They could acquire him and then send him to another team.

  • Author

in other news.... Two National League GMs told the Los Angeles Times that the Dodgers officially got into the bidding for Ivan Rodriguez yesterday. It appears that Pudge is currently seeking $36 million over four years. If the Dodgers sign him, they'll trade Paul Lo Duca.

 

/Rotoworld for Both

in other news.... Two National League GMs told the Los Angeles Times that the Dodgers officially got into the bidding for Ivan Rodriguez yesterday. It appears that Pudge is currently seeking $36 million over four years. If the Dodgers sign him, they'll trade Paul Lo Duca.

 

/Rotoworld for Both com on Pudge sign with the O's for that much.

interesting...the A's have a deep farm system. I'm going to check up on Barett's stats.

 

Looks like hes been awful...maybe hes a defensive specialist. We need another offensive piece though. :plain

Barret was just dealt to the Cubs i think (checks MLB Forums)

The Oakland Athletics traded catcher Michael Barrett to the Chicago Cubs on Tuesday, a day after acquiring him from Montreal.

 

The A's will receive a player to be named from Chicago.

 

In addition, Oakland agreed to a two-year contract with reliever Ricardo Rincon. The 33-year-old left-hander was 8-4 with a 3.25 ERA in 64 relief appearances last season.

 

from a friends site...off the AP wire.

If/ When we unload Mark Redman will that put us over the top for Vlad?

 

Meaning we'll have more than enough money to bring him to S. Fla for sure, assuming all that he, his friends and mom have been saying is true.

This is great news about LA. The longer the O's and the Dodgers are tangled up in the catcher mess, the more time we have to talk to Vlad and come up with an acceptable offer.

 

Hopefully things will keep lining up in our favor!

If/ When we unload Mark Redman will that put us over the top for Vlad?

 

Meaning we'll have more than enough money to bring him to S. Fla for sure, assuming all that he, his friends and mom have been saying is true.

 

That is patently untrue.

 

Bringing Vlad here will drive payroll to almost $80 million in 2004. I believe you are forgetting the $11 million in deferred compensation owed Hampton and Pudge.

80 Mil? I'll bring out the same strategy we use when we can't figure out what down it is when we are playing football.

 

Count them.

That is patently untrue.

 

Bringing Vlad here will drive payroll to almost $80 million in 2004. I believe you are forgetting the $11 million in deferred compensation owed Hampton and Pudge.

Alright, we'll go on an adverb battle:

 

Your claim is also unequivocably false.

 

I have no idea how you came to the conclusion payroll will rise to $80 million in 2004 if we sign Guerrero. First off, most payroll numbers shot out by the press include the $11 million owed to Hampton and Rodriguez. Not everyone we get our information from writes for the Las Vegas Sun ;)

Secondly, there are no contracts these days that strictly work out to a solid average. Take Tejada's deal, for example. It averages out to $12 million a year, but Baltimore is only paying him $7 million next year. God only knows what type of deal our creative masterminds will work out with Guerrero, but whatever it may be, it will most certainly not drive payroll to the preposterous amount you have proposed.

That is patently untrue.

 

Bringing Vlad here will drive payroll to almost $80 million in 2004. I believe you are forgetting the $11 million in deferred compensation owed Hampton and Pudge.

Alright, we'll go on an adverb battle:

 

Your claim is also unequivocably false.

 

I have no idea how you came to the conclusion payroll will rise to $80 million in 2004 if we sign Guerrero. First off, most payroll numbers shot out by the press include the $11 million owed to Hampton and Rodriguez. Not everyone we get our information from writes for the Las Vegas Sun ;)

Secondly, there are no contracts these days that strictly work out to a solid average. Take Tejada's deal, for example. It averages out to $12 million a year, but Baltimore is only paying him $7 million next year. God only knows what type of deal our creative masterminds will work out with Guerrero, but whatever it may be, it will most certainly not drive payroll to the preposterous amount you have proposed.

Obviously dont know how to add. Unless you intend to field a team with fifteen players instead of 25 and you don't want to count deferred compensation, this team's payroll after we go to arbitration with every pitcher excepting Bump and Willis, with Gonzo and the rest is already at about $58 million (including the $11 million) and that doesn't include Redman. I assume when all is said and done our payroll (without VG) will top $62 million and then theres the money we'll spend during the season to stay competitive as we did landing Uggie, etc.

 

Call me a liar for $5 million, maybe with Vlad's $17 million its only $75 million. Just because you get a Vlad G to defer $ 5 mil doesn't mean you aren't going to pay it. The same thing with Luis Castillo who may be paid as little as $4 mil this year but he is owed a significant signing bonus that must be paid during the period of his contract and so you most amortize it over that term.

That is patently untrue.

 

Bringing Vlad here will drive payroll to almost $80 million in 2004. I believe you are forgetting the $11 million in deferred compensation owed Hampton and Pudge.

Alright, we'll go on an adverb battle:

 

Your claim is also unequivocably false.

 

I have no idea how you came to the conclusion payroll will rise to $80 million in 2004 if we sign Guerrero. First off, most payroll numbers shot out by the press include the $11 million owed to Hampton and Rodriguez. Not everyone we get our information from writes for the Las Vegas Sun ;)

Secondly, there are no contracts these days that strictly work out to a solid average. Take Tejada's deal, for example. It averages out to $12 million a year, but Baltimore is only paying him $7 million next year. God only knows what type of deal our creative masterminds will work out with Guerrero, but whatever it may be, it will most certainly not drive payroll to the preposterous amount you have proposed. Yeah, prorated he's making $12 mil per, but usually teams backload contracts anyway, so Derek Jeter is going to be a $20 million player in a year, and so forth. Guerrero will have to back-load any deal, and we do get out from Hampton's payments after next year so having that $10 million and then $11 million off of our books gives us wiggle room in 2 years :banghead , but getting back to topic; a contract negotiation similar to Hamptons which went like:

 

2001: $8.0M (+$20.0M signing bonus deferred until end of contract)

2002: $8.5M

2003: $11.0M [ATL $2.0M / FLA $9.0M]

2004: $12.0M [ATL $2.0M / FLA $10.0M]

2005: $12.5M [ATL $1.5M / FLA $11.0M]

2006: $13.5M

2007: $14.5M

2008: $15.0M

2009: Team option $20.0M or $6.0M buyout

 

would be something for us to think about. A big signing bonus spread out over the course of the contract would work for us I think, with smaller, progressively rising base salaries. Something like that would have to be what we work with considering our restraints, especially with the issue of deferred payments to Pudge/Hampton and financing of a new stadium. :mischief2

This is taken from Ramp's posted payroll spreadsheet, with a few minor modifications:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.style21

{color:#0000D4;

font-size:10.0pt;

font-weight:400;

font-style:normal;

text-decoration:underline;

text-underline-style:single;

font-family:Arial;}

.style0

{text-align:general;

vertical-align:bottom;

white-space:nowrap;

color:windowtext;

font-size:10.0pt;

font-weight:400;

font-style:normal;

text-decoration:none;

font-family:Arial;

border:none;}

.xl24

{font-size:9.0pt;

font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;}

.xl25

{font-size:9.0pt;

font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;}

.xl26

{font-size:9.0pt;

font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;

border-top:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-right:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-bottom:none;

border-left:none;}

.xl27

{font-size:9.0pt;

font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;

border-top:none;

border-right:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-bottom:none;

border-left:none;}

.xl28

{font-size:9.0pt;

font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;

border-top:none;

border-right:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-bottom:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-left:none;}

.xl29

{font-size:9.0pt;

font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;

border:.5pt solid windowtext;}

.xl30

{border-top:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-right:none;

border-bottom:none;

border-left:none;

background:#FFFF99;}

.xl31

{background:#FFFF99;}

.xl32

{border-top:none;

border-right:none;

border-bottom:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-left:none;

background:#FFFF99;}

.xl33

{background:#CCFFCC;}

.xl34

{border-top:none;

border-right:none;

border-bottom:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-left:none;

background:#CCFFFF;}

.xl35

{border-top:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-right:none;

border-bottom:none;

border-left:none;

background:#99CCFF;}

.xl36

{background:#99CCFF;}

.xl37

{border-top:none;

border-right:none;

border-bottom:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-left:none;

background:#99CCFF;}

.xl38

{background:#CCFFCC;}

.xl39

{border-top:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-right:none;

border-bottom:none;

border-left:none;

background:#FFCC99;}

.xl40

{background:#FFCC99;}

.xl41

{border-top:none;

border-right:none;

border-bottom:.5pt solid windowtext;

border-left:none;

background:#FFCC99;}

-->

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pudge Rodriguez-deferral from original

contract

3,000,000

 

 

Mike Hampton

8,000,000

 

 

Ramon Castro

400,000

 

 

Juan Pierre

2,300,000

 

 

Luis Castillo

4,000,000

 

 

Jeff Conine

3,000,000

 

 

Mike Lowell

7,000,000

 

 

Vladimir Guerrero

10,000,000

 

 

Alex Gonzalez

2,500,000

 

 

Miguel Cabrera

300,000

 

 

Hee Seop Choi

400,000

 

 

AJ Burnett

2,500,000

 

 

Mark Redman or Brad Penny

3,000,000

 

 

Josh Beckett

2,100,000

 

 

Carl Pavano

2,500,000

 

 

Dontrelle Willis

375,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Braden Looper

2,500,000

 

 

Chad Fox

1,300,000

 

 

Tim Spooneybarger

300,000

 

 

Tommy Phelps

300,000

 

 

Nate Bump

300,000

 

 

Michael Tejera

300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Josh Willingham/Matt Treanor

400,000

 

 

Abraham Nunez

300,000

 

 

Mike Redmond, Other

1,400,000

 

 

Mike Mordecai

400,000

 

 

Brian Banks

300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

59,175,000

I thought Ramp did an excellent job on his spreadsheet but you have to keep in mind that some of these numbers have changed or will change (to the upside) after arbitration and some clear thinking.

 

For example it's in the Marlins' interest to give certain otherwise ineligible players a raise, Dontrelle and Cabs to name two. The Fish simply cannot allow Dontrelle to be out there every afternoon doing signings and appearances in order to make a few bucks and exhaust himself like he did last year. They are much better offer saying to the guy "look here's $500k, no more than one signing a month" and look for them to lock up Cabs pretty quickly with a multi-year deal. Also Mordy for example will be making more than $400k, Lowell signed for $8 mil, Castillo will average $5.33 per not $4. If you don't accrue for these guys it only come back nd bites you in the butt later on. Banks will make more than $300k next year as a second year player. The list goes on and on...

I thought Ramp did an excellent job on his spreadsheet but you have to keep in mind that some of these numbers have changed or will change (to the upside) after arbitration and some clear thinking.

 

For example it's in the Marlins' interest to give certain otherwise ineligible players a raise, Dontrelle and Cabs to name two. The Fish simply cannot allow Dontrelle to be out there every afternoon doing signings and appearances in order to make a few bucks and exhaust himself like he did last year. They are much better offer saying to the guy "look here's $500k, no more than one signing a month" and look for them to lock up Cabs pretty quickly with a multi-year deal. Also Mordy for example will be making more than $400k, Lowell signed for $8 mil, Castillo will average $5.33 per not $4. If you don't accrue for these guys it only come back nd bites you in the butt later on. Banks will make more than $300k next year as a second year player. The list goes on and on...

We'll see what happens as the off-season goes on and spring training approaches in reference to Dontrelle and Miguel.

 

But, again, with the recent multi-year signings, it's not just an average of the total. I'll point you again to Tejada's deal to assert that.

 

Also, if you look at Ramp's complete spreadsheet you can tell that he accounts for arbitration.

I thought Ramp did an excellent job on his spreadsheet but you have to keep in mind that some of these numbers have changed or will change (to the upside) after arbitration and some clear thinking.

 

For example it's in the Marlins' interest to give certain otherwise ineligible players a raise, Dontrelle and Cabs to name two. The Fish simply cannot allow Dontrelle to be out there every afternoon doing signings and appearances in order to make a few bucks and exhaust himself like he did last year. They are much better offer saying to the guy "look here's $500k, no more than one signing a month" and look for them to lock up Cabs pretty quickly with a multi-year deal. Also Mordy for example will be making more than $400k, Lowell signed for $8 mil, Castillo will average $5.33 per not $4. If you don't accrue for these guys it only come back nd bites you in the butt later on. Banks will make more than $300k next year as a second year player. The list goes on and on...

We'll see what happens as the off-season goes on and spring training approaches in reference to Dontrelle and Miguel.

 

But, again, with the recent multi-year signings, it's not just an average of the total. I'll point you again to Tejada's deal to assert that.

 

Also, if you look at Ramp's complete spreadsheet you can tell that he accounts for arbitration.

Believe me, the FO uses accrual rather cash accounting otherwise you'll have year where 40% of your payroll is due before you sign a player.

 

And do I have to point out again that some of the numbers are just plain unadjusted from 2003 when the union contract demands raises for many of those players? Sheesh.

Either way, you've never given your mathematics behind the $80 million payroll. But you know what? This is pointless. It doesn't look like we're getting Vlad anyway, so let's just drop it.

Just reported on channel 10: it's official: Redman to Oakland for P Mark Neu (former UM Cane), a PTBNL, and cash.

 

 

EDIT: fixed spelling of last name

wow, is this New guy any good? I find it kind of surprising that we traded Big Red if we are in fact out of the Vlad sweepstakes.

Yes, Neu is the man. I saw him pitch in college, and will enjoy watching him pitch again.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.