December 5, 20223 yr 19 minutes ago, rmc523 said: So they lost DeGrom but got Verlander. Fun for us lol. be thankful they didn't keep DeGrom AND sign Verlander?
December 5, 20223 yr 21 minutes ago, rmc523 said: So they lost DeGrom but got Verlander. Fun for us lol. On a much less risky deal than deGrom got, too. That said, I do suppose that at some point, Verlander will fall off. He'll be 40 when he starts next season, so we'll see. And on another note that really doesn't apply all that much to us: he has strangely not been great in the playoffs against anyone other than the Yankees. Edited December 5, 20223 yr by Valid
December 5, 20223 yr Author 9 minutes ago, Valid said: On a much less risky deal than deGrom got, too. That said, I do suppose that at some point, Verlander will fall off. He'll be 40 when he starts next season, so we'll see. And on another note that really doesn't apply all that much to us: he has strangely not been great in the playoffs against anyone other than the Yankees. Was he only that good the last few years because Houston, though? It'll be interesting.
December 5, 20223 yr 6 minutes ago, Michael said: Was he only that good the last few years because Houston, though? It'll be interesting. Houston definitely makes pitchers better, but he was also really good his last couple of years in Detroit. Certainly not that good, though. Edited December 5, 20223 yr by Valid
December 5, 20223 yr 24 minutes ago, Michael said: Was he only that good the last few years because Houston, though? It'll be interesting. A Mets-style implosion of all the guys they signed would be fun to watch.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.