February 9, 200422 yr Bush Is An Idiot, or Is He? Here are excerpts from Iraqi War resolutions: 10/10/02 "Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations...Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq; Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens...Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations...Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction" In the whole resolution, 9-11 is mentioned 4 times. March 7th 2003 War Resolution: "RECOGNIZING the threat Iraq's noncompliance with council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security..." Powell's speech to the UN: "...the United States knows about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, as well as Iraq's involvement in terrorism, which is also the subject of Resolution 1441 and other earlier resolutions...We know that Saddam's son, Qusay, ordered the removal of all prohibited weapons from Saddam's numerous palace complexes. We know that Iraqi government officials, members of the ruling Baath Party and scientists have hidden prohibited items in their homes. Other key files from military and scientific establishments have been placed in cars that are being driven around the countryside by Iraqi intelligence agents to avoid detection...We also have satellite photos that indicate that banned materials have recently been moved from a number of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction facilities...(shows sattellite photo). We know that this one has housed chemical munitions. In fact, this is where the Iraqis recently came up with the additional four chemical weapons shells. Here you see 15 munitions bunkers in yellow and red outlines. The four that are in red squares represent active chemical munitions bunkers...At this biological weapons-related facility on November 25, just 2 days before inspections resumed, this truck caravan appeared -- something we almost never see at this facility and we monitor it carefully and regularly...Iraqi officials deny accusations of ties with al-Qaida. These denials are simply not credible..." Bush September 18th, 03: "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th [attack]..." Bush when asked if there were any weapons of mass destruction, February 9th, he says "[iraq having weapons of mass destruction was] apparently not the case."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/08/elec04.prez.bush/index.html Loose translation of the above for lazy people: Before Iraq war there were weapons of mass destruction, not just "programs", and Iraq was intimately linked with the attacks on September 11th. After the war on Iraq it was admitted that there WERE NO links between Iraq and the September 11th attacks and that there WERE NO weapons of mass destruction. They were not sold or shipped to some other country, they are not burried somewhere (which fabricated/misstated sattellite photos revealed), they were NEVER in existence. Boy is Bush dumb, right? I mean, he says that a bunch of made up things are facts and then admits he lied. He has not only pissed everyone on Earth off, he also pissed the left in America. Furthermore, you would figure that his over 500 billion dollar defecit, increased spending, passing into law of massive government bureaucracies, and increased social programs, that he would alienate those to the right. If you think that Bush is up s***'s creek without a paddle, you are dumb. Bush is a genius. How so? His image is so carefully constructed in such a fashion that he can piss off everyone, leftist or rightist, and still be in the strongest position to win a reelection of the single most powerful nation on Earth. Bush flat out lies to you about a whole war. We are now committed to spend billions of dollars to do something Bush ran in 2000 saying America should never do, NATION BUILDING. I'm not talking about a couple billion, in its totality I'm talking tens upon tens, probaably into the hundreds of billions. He is a conservative, but he increased the government's role in our lives, increased spending, and the bureaucracy in America. He is spending money that does not even exist, allowing the deficit to increase by the amount of 521 billion dollars. He lied about everything. Was it because he was evil? Was it because the political parties are evil? No my friend, all of this happened just because BUSH IS STUPID. The "Bush is stupid" stereotype is something that started under Clinton. When Clinton lied to us, he was slick, thus the nick name "Slick Willy." Gore built himself up a persona as well to deflect criticism, so by the time he told us yet another lie about inventing perpetual motion, we grew accustomed to "Robot Gore: Pathological Liar." That's right, we got so use to his lying, we just accepted it and shrugged it off. Bush is not stupid, so he did the same thing. His wild west rhetoric, stupid "Bushisms" (when he says something entirely wrong, like Africa being a nation), and stupid look on his face lead us all to believe he's just stupid. Sure, he's a sincere man, he really cares about us. He truly wants what is best for everyone, too bad he's just so damn stupid. I can't blame him for lying to us, having fabricated evidence for war presented to us, for alienating America, for increasing spending, this was NONE of his intent, he's just stupid- he couldn't help it! Come election day, every stupid thing that Bush is responsible for will not be blamed on him. He won't be held accountable, because of his "Stupid Bush" persona. He can fall back on it and hell it has worked incredibly so far. One thing we cannot tolerate more than anything else is the fabrication of evidence for a war. Never has this been done so blatantly unless we compare it to works of fiction like 1984. Check out this link about the fabrication of war evidence, aka more crazy Bush hijinx! http://www.xanga.com/item.aspx?user=craigr...gs&uid=47256726 There is no crime higher to a country's people besides literally killing them in mass genocidal activities than making up evidence for a war and BEING CAUGHT. For this reason, not ONE vote should go Bush's way. Not one. It is a matter of PRINCIPLE that we show we do not tolerate pathological liars that spends billions of our dollars. However, Bush will win reelection and we will have another four years of more crazy Bush hijinx! If Cheney runs in 2008, what will he run on, his heart? "Oh, Cheney did not mean to get us into nuclear war, he had his 7th heart attack, I can't possibly blame him for that!" We will be eating those words. :hat http://www.xanga.com/craigramblings
February 9, 200422 yr recall ah-nold So far he's doing a good job... Otherwise the media would be all over him. I haven't heard anything about California and Arnold, therefore, the guy most be doing terrific... The media only likes to spread bad news.
February 9, 200422 yr recall ah-nold So far he's doing a good job... Otherwise the media would be all over him. I haven't heard anything about California and Arnold, therefore, the guy most be doing terrific... The media only likes to spread bad news.true dat. i love how all the new groping scandals ended immediately after he won the election. that was funny. :lol
February 9, 200422 yr BUSH!!!!!! OR WE COULD BRING BACK THE LYING PANSY THAT WAS WORRIED ABOUT GETTING HIS JEWELS OFF AND THE ECONOMY.. TO P***y TO START A WAR! BECAUSE HE DIDNT WANT YA'LL TO HATE HIM LIKE YOU HATE BUSH! BUSH HAS BALLZ AND YA'LL COULD S**K EM
February 10, 200422 yr BUSH!!!!!! OR WE COULD BRING BACK THE LYING PANSY THAT WAS WORRIED ABOUT GETTING HIS JEWELS OFF AND THE ECONOMY.. TO P***y TO START A WAR! BECAUSE HE DIDNT WANT YA'LL TO HATE HIM LIKE YOU HATE BUSH! BUSH HAS BALLZ AND YA'LL COULD S**K EM huh? SORRY I COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WERE SAYING, MUST HAVE BEEN THE CAPS OR YOUR LOVIN FOR "BUSH'S BALLS." :o :confused
February 10, 200422 yr Dean says, "Vote for me or Kittens die!" We defeated all you Soviet Commies in the 1990's, I thought you moved to Cuba.
February 10, 200422 yr Author So the whole lying about war and fiscal policy doesn't bother you as much as pictures of kittens getting killed. How cerebral... People have to stop being so dogmatic. You can't just inherently hate Kerry, Dean, or bush. Hate them for ACTUAL reasons, and what Bush did leaves it that NO ONE should not HATE him. And don't call me a commie, Bush is the commie, he increased social program spending.
February 10, 200422 yr I just thought about what the current state of affairs would be like now had the Supreme Court and others not allowed Bush to steal the election. Al Gore is president...are we at war with the world? hmm. :confused
February 10, 200422 yr BUSH!!!!!! OR WE COULD BRING BACK THE LYING PANSY THAT WAS WORRIED ABOUT GETTING HIS JEWELS OFF AND THE ECONOMY.. TO P***y TO START A WAR! BECAUSE HE DIDNT WANT YA'LL TO HATE HIM LIKE YOU HATE BUSH! BUSH HAS BALLZ AND YA'LL COULD S**K EM Excerpt from a Nazi Germany booklet given to citizens on how to handle "enemy propaganda" (A.K.A the allies): know that the greatest danger of enemy propaganda is in the phrase: "There must be some truth in it." You are upset because the people who oppose Bush have valid arguments.
February 10, 200422 yr I know that some don't like the comparisons with Hitler... But some of the people who support Bush are as irrational as Hitler supporters. They follow him like he was a God and don't even question one of his moves. Just because he is the president and representative of your party of preference, doesn't mean he is allmighty and uncapable of wrongdoings. Please think before you give an opinion and make an ass of yourself. The SA (stortroopers). Mostly young individuals brainwashed to spread terror, violence and propaganda against Jews, the upper classes, and Communists in Nazi Germany.
February 10, 200422 yr I know that some don't like the comparisons with Hitler... But some of the people who support Bush are as irrational as Hitler supporters. They follow him like he was a God and don't even question one of his moves. Just because he is the president and representative of your party of preference, doesn't mean he is allmighty and uncapable of wrongdoings. Please think before you give an opinion and make an ass of yourself. The SA (stortroopers). Mostly young individuals brainwashed to spread terror, violence and propaganda against Jews, the upper classes, and Communists in Nazi Germany. You are the biggest fiction creator. George W. Bush is not even under inquiry for wrong doing. There are hundreds of Democrats in Congress but no inquiry. Besides political issues are not important in general elections in the U.S. Blacks, Jews, Gays, Liberals vote 80% of the time for the Democrat nominee regardless of the issues, candidates. While Conservatives vote 80% of the time for the Republican candidate. So issues, fabricated in this case are not important. It's interesting that you bring up Hilter, the anti-war people at that time did not want the U.S. to enter WW II as the U.S. was not directly affected. So if you anti-war people had their way Nazi Germany would still exist today, much like Saddam would still be in power today.
February 10, 200422 yr Author Saddam is not as bad as hitler. Who started the war Bush or Saddam? Bush. Hitler started wars too. Who killed his political enemies like Hitler/Stalin, Bush or Sadam? Saddam. Making a comparison between the two isn't easy making your point about stepping in during World War II a bad one. Lcyberlina said that people follow Bush even though he stands against everything a rational person would demand, that being a balanced budget, not starting up wars with fabricated evidence and lying about it, and ect. What you yourself fail to grasp angels is that Bush lied to YOU and the American people to put us into a VERY expensive war and he drove up our budget with the neo-conservatives that don't stand for fiscal responsibility. George W. Bush is not even under inquiry for wrong doing. But did he commit wrong, yes or no? HE COMMITTED MANY WRONGFUL ACTS, especially the war on Iraq. He lied to your face, we're spending hundreds of billions, how do you not get it? To not understand something so simple and layed out for you borders upon immense ignorance.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.