CapeFish Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 I vote Extremely Effective. Someone had cleanup duty after Dealin' Dave. Clement/Alfonseca for Tavarez/3 Prospects (Inc. Willis) Floyd/Dempster for Encarnation/Mordecai/Pavano/Lloyd/Prospects Prospects for Redman Wilson/CJ Triple Play deal with Rockies and Braves Not Too Bad for less than 1 1/2 seasons in the job with such a low payroll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teal Shadow Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 His report card is UNfinish in my book until after this seaon. I give him an incomplete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 I chose somewhat effective. He has adressed most of this teams needs, but not all... Let's put it this way. If the team we field next season wins 81 games, I will be extreamely impressed with him... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mephisto Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 I voted effective enough. We will see what he does berfore the deadline. Then we will really know how good he is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1truefan Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 I voted somewhat effective...would like to see more movement...but we had a good offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xdannyx25 Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 he maybe hard headed at times, but i feel hes a very clever person with trades, except for calling players from the minors like nunez.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamrock Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 The prospects we got from the Spos havn't done anything yet...Wayne looks horrible, but Levinski could develop into something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted June 17, 2003 Share Posted June 17, 2003 Umm....One of the Prospects we got from the Expos was Pavano... He has been close to dominant in 2/3 of his starts... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 he wasnt a prospect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mephisto Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 Well Pavano never the less has being pitching good dosen't matter he is not a prospect. He's producing thats what matters. He deserved to win tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SportsCenter Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 Umm....One of the Prospects we got from the Expos was Pavano... He has been close to dominant in 2/3 of his starts... Pavano wasnt a prospect when we got him , He played like 4 years b-4 we got him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 Pavano was a 25-year old that was in AAA when we got him. I know he had played earlier, but he obviously hadn't reached the potential they thought he had when he was there, therefore making him a prospect. He is reaching the dominant for they always thought he could as a Marlin. NOW he is no longer a prospect... I considered him one then. Somewhat of a risk at the time... But this is the year he has flourished into the pitcher they had wanted and believed he could be... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expos Ranchod Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 Pavano was in AAA because he was horrible to start the 02 season in the bigs and he had an option left. So the Expos decided to send him down there to get him going once again. Looks like it has worked. If Pavano stays healthy, Fish have got a good number 3 starter for their rotation.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 I know why Pavano was in AAA. When we acquired him, they talked about why he was down there when the Marlins brought him up. I personaly considered him a prospect because he had not reached the talent level they thought he could when he was with the Expos. He finally has here, and is no longer considered by me a prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 in the world of Josh he may have been a prospect... but in the real world, he wasnt considered one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted June 18, 2003 Share Posted June 18, 2003 Exactly! ...lol... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.