August 31, 200422 yr I dont know the exact number but I believe the Yankees pay about $100 million towards luxury tax
August 31, 200422 yr Author Everyone keeps crying disaster, but the Pads have done so good, that the money will be nice and I guess around $35 million compared to $20 million in 2003 not including the playoffs pot.
August 31, 200422 yr isnt revenue sharing payroll related entirely. the money from the stadium recipts are not changed anytime recently from what i recall. 534196[/snapback] If the Pads make the playoffs or do well at the gates, some money goes into the pot. 25% of all gameday revenues go to the visiting team, which is taxed by MLB. 534208[/snapback] and hasnt this percentage been the same for a long time now? or did budonomics change this concept of revenue sharing also?
August 31, 200422 yr Author isnt revenue sharing payroll related entirely. the money from the stadium recipts are not changed anytime recently from what i recall. 534196[/snapback] If the Pads make the playoffs or do well at the gates, some money goes into the pot. 25% of all gameday revenues go to the visiting team, which is taxed by MLB. 534208[/snapback] and hasnt this percentage been the same for a long time now? or did budonomics change this concept of revenue sharing also? 534219[/snapback] formula of sharing changed.
August 31, 200422 yr isnt revenue sharing payroll related entirely. the money from the stadium recipts are not changed anytime recently from what i recall. 534196[/snapback] If the Pads make the playoffs or do well at the gates, some money goes into the pot. 25% of all gameday revenues go to the visiting team, which is taxed by MLB. 534208[/snapback] and hasnt this percentage been the same for a long time now? or did budonomics change this concept of revenue sharing also? 534219[/snapback] Bud changed it.
August 31, 200422 yr isnt revenue sharing payroll related entirely. the money from the stadium recipts are not changed anytime recently from what i recall. 534196[/snapback] If the Pads make the playoffs or do well at the gates, some money goes into the pot. 25% of all gameday revenues go to the visiting team, which is taxed by MLB. 534208[/snapback] and hasnt this percentage been the same for a long time now? or did budonomics change this concept of revenue sharing also? 534219[/snapback] Bud changed it. 534221[/snapback] what a shocker. btw....just because we are getting 35 million doenst mean we have that much more to spend. if we got 20 this year and 30 next year...then you can sum that we got 10 million more.. i dont think 10 million or even 15 million will allow us to sign all 4 players. ps...the arod contract doesnt do anything. the rangers were paying into the fund in years past since arod signed his contract already.
August 31, 200422 yr ps...the arod contract doesnt do anything. the rangers were paying into the fund in years past since arod signed his contract already. 534226[/snapback] Something makes me think that the Rangers weren't payers in ARod's time there, just a hunch though. And if Loria spends more money, plus the added 10 mil.....well, that goes a long way.
August 31, 200422 yr ps...the arod contract doesnt do anything. the rangers were paying into the fund in years past since arod signed his contract already. 534226[/snapback] It does because this is like the second year the yanks go over the cap and their fine increases every year they do so, and the red sox also went over i believe.
August 31, 200422 yr revenue sharing = welfare the rich give money to the poor, and the poor have to spend it immediately
August 31, 200422 yr revenue sharing = welfare the rich give money to the poor, and the poor have to spend it immediately 534273[/snapback] Basically.
August 31, 200422 yr Like I've said.. don't expect too much from revenue sharing. The increased local revenue the Marlins are earning this year is counted at a much larger percentage than for large-revenue teams. And don't expect Loria to increase payroll past $60MM without a playoff appearance.
August 31, 200422 yr Who's to say the Marlins are going to put their revenue sharing money back into payroll? Maybe that money is already allocated for the new ballpark project.
August 31, 200422 yr And don't expect Loria to increase payroll past $60MM without a playoff appearance. 534388[/snapback] yeah...if a WS championship doesnt get a guy to increase payroll, i dont know what would.
August 31, 200422 yr ps...the arod contract doesnt do anything. the rangers were paying into the fund in years past since arod signed his contract already. 534226[/snapback] Something makes me think that the Rangers weren't payers in ARod's time there, just a hunch though. And if Loria spends more money, plus the added 10 mil.....well, that goes a long way. 534241[/snapback] the rangers were payers in every year of the luxury cap era. adding arod for the yankees added about 8 million in payroll at most.
August 31, 200422 yr According to the announcers on ESPN, the Marlins got the most $$ out of revenue sharing last year, and that STILL didn't allow us to keep guys like Pudge. How is this year going to be any different?
August 31, 200422 yr Author According to the announcers on ESPN, the Marlins got the most $$ out of revenue sharing last year, and that STILL didn't allow us to keep guys like Pudge. How is this year going to be any different? 534735[/snapback] Milwaukee was 1 followed by Montreal.
August 31, 200422 yr isnt revenue sharing payroll related entirely. the money from the stadium recipts are not changed anytime recently from what i recall. 534196[/snapback] from what i know I think the whole revenue sharing goes to the owners and its up to them to spend it on whatever they see fit Loria could put it in his pockets for all he cares ... he's losing money as it is
August 31, 200422 yr According to the announcers on ESPN, the Marlins got the most $$ out of revenue sharing last year, and that STILL didn't allow us to keep guys like Pudge.? How is this year going to be any different? 534735[/snapback] Milwaukee was 1 followed by Montreal. 534739[/snapback] Huh....is there a site with this info?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.