September 15, 200520 yr President Says Iran Willing to Share Nukes Sep 15 12:13 PM US/Eastern By NASSER KARIMI Associated Press Writer TEHRAN, Iran Iran is willing to provide other Islamic nations with nuclear technology, Iran's hard-line president said Thursday. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made the comments after meeting Turkey's prime minister on the sidelines of a gathering of world leaders at the United Nations, according to the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency. Ahmadinejad repeated promises that Iran will not pursue nuclear weapons, IRNA reported. Then he added: "Iran is ready to transfer nuclear know-how to the Islamic countries due to their need." Iran has said it is determined to pursue its nuclear program to process uranium and produce energy, despite European attempts to limit it. The United States accuses Tehran of secretly seeking to develop nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran denies. Meanwhile, diplomats and government officials in Europe said a U.S.- European drive to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council is encountering fierce opposition and could be postponed despite deep international concerns about Tehran's nuclear agenda. Just days before planned action on referral, the diplomats and officials told The Associated Press that the idea of giving Iran a deadline of several weeks to comply with international demands on its nuclear activities is gaining favor. "It would not be a change in policy but a change in timing," said one European official about the possibility of delaying _ but not withdrawing _ the U.N. Security Council threat. There has been strong opposition from more than a dozen nations on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency to a demand for referral at next week's board meeting. The officials and diplomats _ some in Vienna, others elsewhere in Europe _ demanded spoke on condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the negotiations on what tack to take on Iran. Their comments seemed to mirror indications from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that Washington was prepared to delay again its drive for Security Council referral. Rice last week appealed openly to China, Russia, India and other nations to support the United States in threatening Iran with sanctions for refusing to halt its nuclear program. Russia quickly registered its opposition to trying to impose sanctions in the U.N. Security Council, and the White House acknowledged Wednesday that President Bush was unable to get a commitment from Chinese President Hu Jintao. Ahmadinejad urged the U.N. not to bend to U.S. pressure. "The raison d'etre of the United Nations is to promote global peace and tranquility," he told the General Assembly. "Therefore, any license for pre-emptive measures which are essentially based on gauging intentions rather than objective facts ... is a blatant contradiction to the very foundation of the United Nations and the letter and the spirit of its charter." Washington had been a key force in trying to marshal enough support at Monday's board meeting of the Vienna-based IAEA for referral. But in comments Wednesday, Rice indirectly acknowledged that drive was faltering. "I am not so concerned about exactly when it happens," Rice told the Fox News Editorial Board, "because I don't think this matter is so urgent that it has to come on Sept. 19." The European Union has taken the lead in trying to persuade Iran to halt development of nuclear activities that could be used to make weapons in exchange for economic concessions. The European official said that _ as of Thursday _ any resolution in Vienna demanding immediate referral to the Security Council would have "only a slim majority of two or three countries" on the 35-member IAEA board. Rice on Wednesday suggested the EU remained fully committed to referral, saying: "The question is how much support can you bring that is non-European support." But officials and diplomats said that was not so. About a half-dozen EU member nations _ among them Italy, Spain and Portugal _ are openly questioning the authority of France, Britain and Germany to negotiate a resolution at the board meeting on behalf of the European Union, said the official. Iran's lobby efforts against referral "have been rather successful," said the official. "Both African countries and nonaligned countries are very keen on it not going to the Security Council." A senior nonaligned diplomat in Vienna said informal but high-level contacts were under way between Tehran and key EU countries on what concessions Iran was prepared to make in exchange for a delay of the push to have Iran hauled before the Security Council. Ahmadinejad is expected to reveal new Iranian proposals by the weekend at the U.N. summit, which it hopes will defuse the nuclear crisis. Among those leaning against the idea of immediate referral in favor of a several-weeks-long deadline is IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei, said several officials and diplomats. One of them said ElBaradei "moved over to the camp" of countries opposed to referral in recent weeks as that group of countries has grown. While an EU diplomat said ElBaradei had suggested a delay as one of several options, the European official said the IAEA chief appeared increasingly to be backing that approach over others in recent conversations with EU foreign ministers and Rice.
September 15, 200520 yr Hmmm, that isnt good at all. But I am sure that wont stop halaburton from keeping their major contract with them
September 16, 200520 yr We don't want to use them!! No no! We want to give them to the people who do want to use them. :thumbup
September 16, 200520 yr Part of me says that the Islamic nations deserve the opportunity to benefit from nuclear energy. That's the stupid and naive part of me. The other part of me says Iran is practically begging George Bush to send an army up their ass. You know, assuming we actually have any available units to send. Hey, Germany, you want this one?
September 16, 200520 yr and this my friends is why you never should have invaded a place you had no business in. good job.
September 16, 200520 yr and this my friends is why you never should have invaded a place you had no business in. good job. 948039[/snapback] If they really want nukes so bad... Send out the B52's :thumbdown They can get nuclear power without the use of nuclear weapons. The technology is a different style of use.
September 16, 200520 yr and this my friends is why you never should have invaded a place you had no business in. good job. 948039[/snapback] If they really want nukes so bad... Send out the B52's :thumbdown They can get nuclear power without the use of nuclear weapons. The technology is a different style of use. 948101[/snapback] Well, just to be clear, the article doesn't say they're going to share nukes. It says they're going to share "nuclear technology". As to what that actually means...I dunno. EDIT: Actually, he headline does use the word "nukes". Which makes that an awful headline.
September 16, 200520 yr Once you start giving other countries nuclear technology, they are sooner or later going to start thinking about using that knowledge to make weapons. Especially if we're talking about Syria. I would also rather not see Hezbollah, Abu Sayyaf, or another militant terrorist organization get a hold of this info.
September 16, 200520 yr Once you start giving other countries nuclear technology, they are sooner or later going to start thinking about using that knowledge to make weapons. Especially if we're talking about Syria. I would also rather not see Hezbollah, Abu Sayyaf, or another militant terrorist organization get a hold of this info.948421[/snapback] And how will a terrorist organization that has no fixed base build nuclear weapons? With what infrastructure?
September 17, 200520 yr Once you start giving other countries nuclear technology, they are sooner or later going to start thinking about using that knowledge to make weapons. Especially if we're talking about Syria. I would also rather not see Hezbollah, Abu Sayyaf, or another militant terrorist organization get a hold of this info.948421[/snapback] And how will a terrorist organization that has no fixed base build nuclear weapons? With what infrastructure? 948497[/snapback] I'm sure some members of the Saudi royal family would be all too happy to fund a terrorist organization. That goes along with Syria, Iran, and North Korea at least. It doesn't take much to build a dirty bomb, which has a psychological effect that nearly equals a nuclear weapon.
September 17, 200520 yr Author Once you start giving other countries nuclear technology, they are sooner or later going to start thinking about using that knowledge to make weapons. Especially if we're talking about Syria. I would also rather not see Hezbollah, Abu Sayyaf, or another militant terrorist organization get a hold of this info.948421[/snapback] And how will a terrorist organization that has no fixed base build nuclear weapons? With what infrastructure? 948497[/snapback] I'm sure some members of the Saudi royal family would be all too happy to fund a terrorist organization. That goes along with Syria, Iran, and North Korea at least. It doesn't take much to build a dirty bomb, which has a psychological effect that nearly equals a nuclear weapon. 949631[/snapback] Iran is already funding the insurgency in Iraq.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.