Fish4Life Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 With the Delgado deal we get Mike Jacobs. But w/e happen to Stokes? Wasnt he suppose to be the next monster 1st basemen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultimopain Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 He ain't ready. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBMarlin Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Stokes who? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flamarlins3 Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 He's worthless in every way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 With Delgado gone I bet Stokes turns his career around this year and if Jacobs struggles Stokes will take over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 if Stokes could ever stay healthy.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoriaLovesVegas Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Doesnt hurt giving him a shot. Not like we have an all star blocking him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSLMARLIN Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Jacobs will be an all star Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fritz Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 He's a power hitter that can't hit for power. Thus, he's useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugg Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 He's a power hitter that can't hit for power. Thus, he's useless. Yeah, his .521 career SLG is a joke. :shifty His main issue is health, his Albuquerque numbers from 05 are sexy, but they're only in 46 AB (.283/.340/.674 5 HR). It's easy to give up on someone who keeps getting hurt, but lets not forget he's only 23 years old (24 in January). He's not someone you want to have in an important role right now, but giving up on him would be stupid. If he stays healthy this season, his stock is going to soar. He's a luxury with Jacobs having been acquired. If Stokes breaks out, great, we can move him to LF (if even needed there) or trade him. If he doesn't, oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 If Jacobs can show that he can catch full time and be decent at it, then Stokes should get a nice shot at 1B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 If Jacobs can show that he can catch full time and be decent at it, then Stokes should get a nice shot at 1B. for a week.... till he goes down with a thumb injury again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rferry Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Injuries, poor defense, poor hitting (for average), poor strike zone judgment. I'd love for Jacobs, Willingham and Treanor or a veteran backup to get 50 or so games each behind the plate next year in addition to other duties. Together they'd combine .800+ OPS at a position where you're lucky to get a .750 guy, while making the league minimum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockyMountainMarlin Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 He better be up for Spring training although I doubt he'll win the position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugg Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 Injuries, poor defense, poor hitting (for average), poor strike zone judgment. He hit .272 in his last full season. If he's gonna slug .513, I'll take .272. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 How is Jacobs in LF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farmer_fran Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 Injuries, poor defense, poor hitting (for average), poor strike zone judgment. He hit .272 in his last full season. If he's gonna slug .513, I'll take .272. 121 K's in 394 at-bats is a little worrisome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildduckct Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 If Jacobs can show that he can catch full time and be decent at it, then Stokes should get a nice shot at 1B. Mike has shown the ability to adjust to pitchers as they adjust to him. After hitting 4 HRs in his first 4 games, he went into a mini-slump then made adjustments. Then again, pitchers adjusted to him. And somehow, he was able to come back and finish the year hitting .310 with his 10 HRs in around 100 ABs. So I think he's the real deal. But not a catcher. No way. He's an adequate first baseman. He looked like Keith Hernandez compared to the failed Mike Piazza experiment at 1B, but he's not that great a fielder. I'd call him adequate. Look, after you guys win again in a few years and dismantle your team again, you can always trade Jacobs to the AL where he can shine as a DH. And Petit is no throw in. He's a legit prospect that throws slow stuff but manages to average a K an inning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.