January 26, 200620 yr The tighter the vote, the more and more cheating that takes place. Im hesitant to do post your vote because overall votes would go down, but I am strongly considering it. well no kidding there woud be less votes because the spammers would only be voting once....hey and sorry Passion that some people have to cheat and ruin the fun...it also makes your job more difficult and less enjoyable as now you have to count the votes manually
January 27, 200620 yr :lol :lol :lol :lol might as well just hand the 'title' to AA or LC now that we've decided to make the voting legit after letting their superior competitors (e.g. carmella, who won 15-8 in posted votes; or sofia, who won 14-8) get knocked off. /bitter and vengeful
January 27, 200620 yr Author :lol :lol :lol :lol might as well just hand the 'title' to AA or LC now that we've decided to make the voting legit after letting their superior competitors (e.g. carmella, who won 15-8 in posted votes; or sofia, who won 14-8) get knocked off. /bitter and vengeful Someone's feathers were ruffled because of Carmella's exit. :plain Yeah, I should have gone to the post your vote sooner, but I didnt' know if as many people would vote (which isn't the case). After doing it one way for four times, I'm not good with change...plus it adds alot more time tabulating the results this way. Going forward in this one and then in subsequent Bowls, we will always do post your vote. Lame that people have to wreck some of the fun. Anyways.... The Final Four #2 Alessandra Ambrosio VS. #2 Laetitia Casta #3 Elisha Cuthbert VS. #15 Josie Maran
January 27, 200620 yr the girls that could have easily won this tourney are gone cause people cheated....giselle,carmella,sofia vergara,jennifer walcott and a couple of others are better looking thann some of the girls in the final rounds....Also stacy kiebler was up like 5 votes with like 5min to go on A.A. and out of nowhere she got 6 votes......
January 28, 200620 yr Jesus Christ, some of you are real f***ing losers. Made life harder for poor Passion because you were cheating on an online 'babe bowl'. Wow. You guys know who you are, just end yourselves now, do society a favor.
January 28, 200620 yr It's just bulls*** and pathetically sad that some losers feel the need to cheat in an online forum babe bowl. You are the people who cheated on practice tests in school.
January 28, 200620 yr It's just bulls*** and pathetically sad that some losers feel the need to cheat in an online forum babe bowl. You are the people who cheated on practice tests in school. Hey wait a second!! Let's draw the line here...I cheated on practice tests at school.
January 28, 200620 yr I just wanna say this was fun and thanks for putting this on The Final Four #2 Alessandra Ambrosio VS. #2 Laetitia Casta #3 Elisha Cuthbert VS. #15 Josie Maran pretty solid 4 really despite what others say. I wish Kim smith would of made it she is my favorite specially since folks are cops
January 28, 200620 yr Yeah, it's a real solid FF. I can't remember who the hell was in this thing anymore, but I'm sure if I had to pick a Top 4 both AA and LC would be in it. I'm not sure how Josie Maran pulled this off, but whatever. Her run ends here.
January 28, 200620 yr Author the girls that could have easily won this tourney are gone cause people cheated....giselle,carmella,sofia vergara,jennifer walcott and a couple of others are better looking thann some of the girls in the final rounds....Also stacy kiebler was up like 5 votes with like 5min to go on A.A. and out of nowhere she got 6 votes...... That is totally a matter of opinion.
January 28, 200620 yr I think the fact that Alba is not in the final four is a travesty. But hey, thats just me.
January 31, 200620 yr the girls that could have easily won this tourney are gone cause people cheated....giselle,carmella,sofia vergara,jennifer walcott and a couple of others are better looking thann some of the girls in the final rounds.... That's because of the matchups. Some matchups had 2 possible winners, and some had 2 girls with no shot. So some girls that aren't that hott got further than girls hotter than them.
January 31, 200620 yr I must say AA vs. Elisha is prolly the best finals that we have had for a babe bowl, very tough choice for me anyway
February 1, 200620 yr I must say AA vs. Elisha is prolly the best finals that we have had for a babe bowl I totally agree, and it's very surprising with all the #1 seeds going down early.
February 1, 200620 yr Just a suggestion given that previous winners were toppled by previous nominees who didn't win: what about allowing some ladies to become re-eligible for future babe-bowls? Just a thought.
February 1, 200620 yr Author Just a suggestion given that previous winners were toppled by previous nominees who didn't win: what about allowing some ladies to become re-eligible for future babe-bowls? Just a thought. Explain further...I don't get your point.
February 1, 200620 yr Just a suggestion given that previous winners were toppled by previous nominees who didn't win: what about allowing some ladies to become re-eligible for future babe-bowls? Just a thought. Explain further...I don't get your point. The current all-star final is between two ladies who didn't win either of the babe bowls they were in. Also, many babe bowl entrants are porn-stars or nude models, seriously diluting the field. My suggestion is that women who were in the previous 4 babe-bowls, and did well but didn't win the entire tournament should become re-eligible for future tournaments. I propose a simple system: 1) Any nominee to win at least one previous matchup (meaning they made it to the round of 32), while not winning the babe bowl, is "re-eligible." 2) No more than 8 previous nominees will be allowed into any future babe-bowl, thus ensuring fresh faces. 3) A contestant can only be renominated twice, and loses all future eligibility if she fails to make it out of the round of 64. Just a thought given the evident popularity of some girls, and the fact that I think we're going to run out of nominees soon if adult stars are prohibited from future bowls.
February 1, 200620 yr Author I still don't understand why people are so irritated by the fact that the top seeds lost. When you mix in different girls from different bowls, some of the matchups might not favor the previous high seeds. If it was just going to be the higher seeds winning out, there would be no point in putting this on in the first place. The complaining that has gone on in this one really makes me not want to put in the effort to do another one again.
February 1, 200620 yr Jesus Christ it is a tourney of women. If people cheated and have no lives, thats not your porblem it is theirs. Let it go guys.
February 1, 200620 yr I'm not complaining at all, just offering a suggestion to keep future ones fun and fresh. I just feel that my idea is validated by the fact that the two finalists in the all-star edition bowl didn't win the babe bowls they were in, that's it.
February 1, 200620 yr I'm not complaining at all, just offering a suggestion to keep future ones fun and fresh. I just feel that my idea is validated by the fact that the two finalists in the all-star edition bowl didn't win the babe bowls they were in, that's it. Different people have different tastes. For example Girl A wins 1 Babe Bowl by beating girl B Girl A is knocked out by girl C before ever facing girl B again Girl B beats girl C Did girls drom previous babe bowls ever go head to head again And if they did were the results any different? It as all about matchups. Different people have different tastes for different girls. For example, I am not a big Scarlett fan, but alot of people are.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.