October 17, 200422 yr When did this happen? I thought he had to leave for family reasons. 594096[/snapback] So did I :confused
October 17, 200422 yr I thought his wife was real sick or something like that so he missed the last month
October 17, 200422 yr I thought his wife was real sick or something like that so he missed the last month 594105[/snapback] So did I .... I was on the White Sox board and they said Perisho told him (fan) that Billy's wife was sick
October 17, 200422 yr umm.... Maybe they didn't know what to put there so they put Suspended by team :headscratch :lol
October 17, 200422 yr go down and look at transactions.... 594120[/snapback] Well that's about a month ago and also about the same time he took his leave of absence from the team for "personal reasons." It's either one of two things, either he really did take a leave of absence for personal reasons and FOXSports.com is wrong OR he really was suspended and the whole thing about leaving the team for personal reasons was just BS that the FO came up with to save face. Who knows....
October 17, 200422 yr on sports illustrated as well Like I said when he first left that is was because he was sucking it up and you all hated on me. Haters. Why aren't you all crying for him anymore?
October 17, 200422 yr I thought he had to leave for personal reasons...well I guess I was wrong again.
October 17, 200422 yr I saw his suspension on Yahoo also. Maybe it was lost in the headlines of the other suspensions like Guillen, Bradley and Francisco, because this was the least known about suspension I've ever heard of. :confused
October 17, 200422 yr I'm sure it's just a formality. They probably had to put him on some sort of status to free up a roster spot. Instead of putting him on the DL, where he'd have to be off the roster for a specific amount of time, they put him on suspended status. I'm not too concerned over it.
October 17, 200422 yr I'm sure it's just a formality. They probably had to put him on some sort of status to free up a roster spot. Instead of putting him on the DL, where he'd have to be off the roster for a specific amount of time, they put him on suspended status. 594360[/snapback] I was thinking the same thing. :thumbup
October 17, 200422 yr he could be a nice addition to our pen next year....we can use him.....and i think he would sign for around minimum with the year he had
October 18, 200422 yr I'm sure it's just a formality. They probably had to put him on some sort of status to free up a roster spot. Instead of putting him on the DL, where he'd have to be off the roster for a specific amount of time, they put him on suspended status. I'm not too concerned over it. 594360[/snapback] It was september, the rosters were expanded, we had plenty of roster spots left.
October 18, 200422 yr I'm sure it's just a formality. They probably had to put him on some sort of status to free up a roster spot. Instead of putting him on the DL, where he'd have to be off the roster for a specific amount of time, they put him on suspended status. I'm not too concerned over it. 594360[/snapback] they have the bereavement list
October 20, 200422 yr I thought he was sent to the minors and he declined so he became a free agent maybe I read it wrong... either way, he is gone
October 20, 200422 yr On ESPNews they said Koch was outright released, Castro declined the assignment to the minors and became a free agent.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.