MVPosey Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Bonds didn't didn't have Greg Anderson as one of his trainers until 2001, and he didn't get involved with balco until the winter of 2000. So here is a photo back in early 2000, before he allegedly got involved with Balco and Anderson now is a photo from last year: can you tell a difference? Neither can I. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJB34 Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 hey! that picture was taken at the pro! :thumbup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBurque Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 sad really :tissue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 you are an idiot SanFranFan he could have juiced before 2001 right? jee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Das Texan Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 you are an idiot SanFranFan he could have juiced before 2001 right? jee i can agree on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nc marlin Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 you are an idiot SanFranFan he could have juiced before 2001 right? jee i can agree on that. everybody knows steroids didn't exist before balco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skully Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Barry didn't juice....People always show pictures of him from 1987 and compare them to pictures of him now.... Give me 17 years and I can look like that too. Give the guy some credit for being so disciplined and being such a hard worker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGreatOne Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Ummmm Giants fan you really need to get off Bonds Penne. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebirth Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Giants fans just can't handle the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugg Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Picture comparisons prove nothing, this argument is beyond tired at this point. Anyone who loses 10 pounds is "off the juice" anyone who's gotten bigger over a 10 year span is "obviously on steroids." It's a simple fact that you can't prove anything by posting 2 pictures next to each other when it comes to steroids. All you're proving is that the guy is bigger, or smaller, than he was in the other picture. And for the record, Giants fan up here is no less biased than some of you who are leading the pitchforks in the Lynch Bonds posse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Picture comparisons prove nothing, this argument is beyond tired at this point. Anyone who loses 10 pounds is "off the juice" anyone who's gotten bigger over a 10 year span is "obviously on steroids." It's a simple fact that you can't prove anything by posting 2 pictures next to each other when it comes to steroids. All you're proving is that the guy is bigger, or smaller, than he was in the other picture. And for the record, Giants fan up here is no less biased than some of you who are leading the pitchforks in the Lynch Bonds posse. Good use of the word "posse." And, having watched professional wrestling all my life I can agree that in MOST cases you can't tell who is juicing and when by photos. The Rock was on steroids and got off them and there was no change at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugg Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Before: After: Look at the second one, the Ninja Turtles arms are clearly bigger and they look a little shorter, steroids stunt your growth. Clearly, the Ninja Turtles are on steroids. I want asteriks put on all their movie titles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 I think the question is, is this an issue? Anyone who takes anything to stimulate muscle growth is "cheating," in my book. I can at least respect the steroid abusers more because they're taking their lives in their hands to excel. The other guys are just taking the shorter route to lesser accomplishments. Not that I necessarily agree with anthing I've written above, because I don't care AT ALL about steroids. I think they either make ALL that stuff (including the over the counter GNC stuff) legal or illegal and then everyone can shut up about it. Booze, cigarettes and women, these were Babe Ruth's "steroids." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Bond's in my opinion juiced in the 99 offseason, if you check the witchhunt there's a link of a pictures of bonds from every year in his career. Furthermore, Bond's head MOST DEFINITELY grew. there's no debate to this fact. Brian, the whole 86 Mets were on amphetamines and coke. However, nower days the players have more drugs to give them an edge. So the 86 mets had their coke and amphetamines, but the 2002 Angels and 2003 Yankees and the 2003 Giants had their steroids. Steroids are a better cheating drug (increased muscle mass), and nothing stopped gary sheffield from juicing and doing greenies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJB34 Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 lmfao, good work big hugg :lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAngels Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Bond's in my opinion juiced in the 99 offseason, if you check the witchhunt there's a link of a pictures of bonds from every year in his career. Furthermore, Bond's head MOST DEFINITELY grew. there's no debate to this fact. Brian, the whole 86 Mets were on amphetamines and coke. However, nower days the players have more drugs to give them an edge. So the 86 mets had their coke and amphetamines, but the 2002 Angels and 2003 Yankees and the 2003 Giants had their steroids. Steroids are a better cheating drug (increased muscle mass), and nothing stopped gary sheffield from juicing and doing greenies. More useless spam! :ban :censored :deadhorse :jackass :elefant :thumbdown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beinfest4Prez Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Bond's in my opinion juiced in the 99 offseason, if you check the witchhunt there's a link of a pictures of bonds from every year in his career. Furthermore, Bond's head MOST DEFINITELY grew. there's no debate to this fact. Brian, the whole 86 Mets were on amphetamines and coke. However, nower days the players have more drugs to give them an edge. So the 86 mets had their coke and amphetamines, but the 2002 Angels and 2003 Yankees and the 2003 Giants had their steroids. Steroids are a better cheating drug (increased muscle mass), and nothing stopped gary sheffield from juicing and doing greenies. More useless spam! :ban :censored :deadhorse :jackass :elefant :thumbdown Don't hate, participate! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Juanky Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 Before: After: Look at the second one, the Ninja Turtles arms are clearly bigger and they look a little shorter, steroids stunt your growth. Clearly, the Ninja Turtles are on steroids. I want asteriks put on all their movie titles. Biggie your sig = awesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGreatOne Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Before: After: Look at the second one, the Ninja Turtles arms are clearly bigger and they look a little shorter, steroids stunt your growth. Clearly, the Ninja Turtles are on steroids. I want asteriks put on all their movie titles. :lol good one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Bond's in my opinion juiced in the 99 offseason, if you check the witchhunt there's a link of a pictures of bonds from every year in his career. Furthermore, Bond's head MOST DEFINITELY grew. there's no debate to this fact. Brian, the whole 86 Mets were on amphetamines and coke. However, nower days the players have more drugs to give them an edge. So the 86 mets had their coke and amphetamines, but the 2002 Angels and 2003 Yankees and the 2003 Giants had their steroids. Steroids are a better cheating drug (increased muscle mass), and nothing stopped gary sheffield from juicing and doing greenies. More useless spam! :ban :censored :deadhorse :jackass :elefant :thumbdown the irony...spam... :spam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FishFan24 Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Find me a picture of when he played for Pittsburgh and how he looks now. See something? Case closed :cool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 done all the HGH filled in the wrinkles of Bond's decripidely old age of 39. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FishFan24 Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Besides getting rid of that god awful stash, he's definately bigger. And I don't think it was his ego that made his head that big. :whistle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Juanky Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 He should bring the moustache back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 when he has it, it becomes really obvious his face has ballooned...he has no choice but to not have one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.