May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes.
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value?
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? it's gonna take some major prospects for the Pirates to eat any of Kendall's contract since they aren't exactly a large market team with lots of money.
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? it's gonna take some major prospects for the Pirates to eat any of Kendall's contract since they aren't exactly a large market team with lots of money. maybe willingham and a good pitcher... Nanninni?
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade line, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? it's gonna take some major prospects for the Pirates to eat any of Kendall's contract since they aren't exactly a large market team with lots of money. maybe willingham and a good pitcher... Nanninni? Nannini isn't very good.
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade line, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? it's gonna take some major prospects for the Pirates to eat any of Kendall's contract since they aren't exactly a large market team with lots of money. maybe willingham and a good pitcher... Nanninni? Nannini isn't very good. he's decent bazardo? he might have too much potential to give up
May 11, 200422 yr so what was the official line for hutchinson tonight? Hutch gets win number 5, 7IP 1er, 2k 5h(i think)
May 11, 200422 yr so what was the official line for hutchinson tonight? Hutch gets win number 5, 7IP 1er, 2k 5h(i think) i dont want thinks... and also walks are usually a part of his official line.
May 11, 200422 yr here is his line... Trevor Hutchinson 7.0ip 8 hits 1 run nad it was earned 1 walk 2 strikeouts 3.38 ERA thats decent...not all that stellar.
May 11, 200422 yr Author hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? you have no where to put him, might as well let him go to a team that he would play with and Hutch was pretty good tonight..... not many strikeouts but a good game nonetheless by the way, Stokes homered for his 4th straight game(not sure if that was mentioned) gotta think Willingham is about to turn this around, yesterday he went 2/4 with a bomb, and today he had the game winning rbi.... let's hope the hits keep on comin
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? I agree. I'd rather give up three decent prospects than one great one. At one point I felt that Stokes would be the part of a mid-season acquisition for us, but the way he's catching up to his old self now, he should stay. Now I know what you're thinking, we have the up-and-coming super-star in Choi for the next 5 years, why keep Stokes? Because, as sad as it sounds, Mr. Marlin can't be in left field forever. Playing there will slowly shorten his career IMO, and he won't be with us opening day of 2006. If Stokes has any place on this team as a full-time guy, it's going to be in left field. P.S.: I have a question; Stokes is 21 or 22?
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? I agree. I'd rather give up three decent prospects than one great one. At one point I felt that Stokes would be the part of a mid-season acquisition for us, but the way he's catching up to his old self now, he should stay. Now I know what you're thinking, we have the up-and-coming super-star in Choi for the next 5 years, why keep Stokes? Because, as sad as it sounds, Mr. Marlin can't be in left field forever. Playing their will slowly shorten his career IMO, and he won't be with us opening day of 2006. If Stokes has any place on this team as a full-time guy, it's going to be in left field. P.S.: I have a question; Stokes is 21 or 22? We have a guy by the name of Jeremy Hermida. Ever heard of him?
May 11, 200422 yr hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!! AAA by august, we'll see him in the bigs by september 2005 at this rate En Fuego! I predict he'll be traded by the trade deadline, and hopefully he keeps hitting like this especially if we end up going after Kendall, we might be able to get Pittsburgh to pay off a considerable amount of Kendall's contract if we give them Stokes and a couple other players. I love Stokes, I think he's going to be a great player, but he's a first baseman and we've got 1st base covered and once Conine retires Hermida is the heir apparent in the outfield not Stokes. idk, stokes would be tough to let go of... i think we could kendall for less, maybe more prospects of less value? I agree. I'd rather give up three decent prospects than one great one. At one point I felt that Stokes would be the part of a mid-season acquisition for us, but the way he's catching up to his old self now, he should stay. Now I know what you're thinking, we have the up-and-coming super-star in Choi for the next 5 years, why keep Stokes? Because, as sad as it sounds, Mr. Marlin can't be in left field forever. Playing their will slowly shorten his career IMO, and he won't be with us opening day of 2006. If Stokes has any place on this team as a full-time guy, it's going to be in left field. P.S.: I have a question; Stokes is 21 or 22? We have a guy by the name of Jeremy Hermida. Ever heard of him? You honestly believe he'll be ready by opening day, 2006? Stokes has a head start.
May 11, 200422 yr Hermedia will probably be called up to AA shortly. Yes Jeremy could be ready by opening day 2006. Fairly easily.
May 11, 200422 yr Hermedia will probably be called up to AA shortly. Yes Jeremy could be ready by opening day 2006. Fairly easily. While I do agree to that for the most part, I don't think Stokes should be dealt at the deadline unless it is for someone(s) stellar.
May 11, 200422 yr Author Hermedia will probably be called up to AA shortly. Yes Jeremy could be ready by opening day 2006. Fairly easily. While I do agree to that for the most part, I don't think Stokes should be dealt at the deadline unless it is for someone(s) stellar. and who would that be?
May 11, 200422 yr Hermedia will probably be called up to AA shortly. Yes Jeremy could be ready by opening day 2006. Fairly easily. While I do agree to that for the most part, I don't think Stokes should be dealt at the deadline unless it is for someone(s) stellar. and who would that be? Someone better than your avatar.
May 11, 200422 yr Author Hermedia will probably be called up to AA shortly. Yes Jeremy could be ready by opening day 2006. Fairly easily. While I do agree to that for the most part, I don't think Stokes should be dealt at the deadline unless it is for someone(s) stellar. and who would that be? Someone better than your avatar. who then?
May 11, 200422 yr We can't trade away another 1B. First Gonzalez, then Lee, now you guys wanna trade Stokes too? And Choi is off to a hot start and I'm not saying he's bad or anything, but I think he has to prove himself before we go trading away prospect after prospect.
May 11, 200422 yr We can't trade away another 1B. First Gonzalez, then Lee, now you guys wanna trade Stokes too? And Choi is off to a hot start and I'm not saying he's bad or anything, but I think he has to prove himself before we go trading away prospect after prospect. He's been proving himself for 14 months when he's given playing time.
May 12, 200422 yr Hermedia will probably be called up to AA shortly. Yes Jeremy could be ready by opening day 2006. Fairly easily. While I do agree to that for the most part, I don't think Stokes should be dealt at the deadline unless it is for someone(s) stellar. and who would that be? Someone better than your avatar. who then? ooo ooo pick me! pick me!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.