June 13, 200521 yr On today's 7 PM BBTN show he said, "After seeing JP and Mota this weekend I believe this team will get it going soon."
June 13, 200521 yr JP and Mota? More like JP and Mikey. 808123[/snapback] I hope so...because Mota hasn't been doing anything right lately.
June 13, 200521 yr Sutcliffe: One of the top 5 offenses in baseball. :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol What Marlins offense is he watching?
June 13, 200521 yr Mota? If he saw him this weekend and thinks the Marlins will get it going based on Mota than Gammons needs a new job.
June 13, 200521 yr Sutcliffe: One of the top 5 offenses in baseball. :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol What Marlins offense is he watching? 808129[/snapback] Stop being so stupid...the Marlins BA is higher than any other Marlins team ever...as long as JP and Luis get on base, this offense is unstoppable.
June 13, 200521 yr Sutcliffe: One of the top 5 offenses in baseball. :lol ? :lol ? :lol ? :lol ? :lol What Marlins offense is he watching? 808129[/snapback] Stop being so stupid...the Marlins BA is higher than any other Marlins team ever...as long as JP and Luis get on base, this offense is unstoppable. 808132[/snapback] SHOW ME THE RUNS!!!
June 13, 200521 yr He mispoke when her said Mota, he must've been talking about Lowell. 808144[/snapback] No, he was talking about Mota. He was saying how his velocity was up and thats a good sign.
June 13, 200521 yr He mispoke when her said Mota, he must've been talking about Lowell. 808144[/snapback] No, he was talking about Mota. He was saying how his velocity was up and thats a good sign. 808145[/snapback] My mistake, I was flipping through channels and wasn't really paying good attention. pardon my ignorance.
June 13, 200521 yr Sutcliffe: One of the top 5 offenses in baseball. :lol ? :lol ? :lol ? :lol ? :lol What Marlins offense is he watching? 808129[/snapback] Stop being so stupid...the Marlins BA is higher than any other Marlins team ever...as long as JP and Luis get on base, this offense is unstoppable. 808132[/snapback] He's certainly not being stupid. The Marlins are: Ranked 6th in average Ranked 13 in slugging 6th in OBP 22nd in Runs 27th in HR's 23 in RBI's. They are a middle of the road team in terms of offense up to this point. THat certainly can change but at this point they are certainly not a top 5 team.
June 13, 200521 yr The Marlins offense is a top 5 team on paper, but so far as the stats indicate, they are far from that.
June 14, 200521 yr IF JP and Luis get on base consistantly this team would score 5 runs a game easily.
June 14, 200521 yr Gammons knows a hell of a lot more than any of us here. Those that keep bringing up 2003, and how he didn't pick us that year miss the obvious. There was no way to predict that Willis and Cabrera would be so good, and continue to be good throughout the season. We caught every break in the book, and some, like Bartman, that no one would believe if it was in a book. I think I'll go with Gammons opinion over anyone's on this board.
June 14, 200521 yr Just because Gammons is on the $20 bill doesn't mean he knows everything. He's great to get info from, but he must have missed the part where Mota kept giving up runs.
June 14, 200521 yr Gammons knows a hell of a lot more than any of us here. Those that keep bringing up 2003, and how he didn't pick us that year miss the obvious. There was no way to predict that Willis and Cabrera would be so good, and continue to be good throughout the season. We caught every break in the book, and some, like Bartman, that no one would believe if it was in a book. I think I'll go with Gammons opinion over anyone's on this board. 808288[/snapback] :lol
June 14, 200521 yr Gammons knows a hell of a lot more than any of us here. Those that keep bringing up 2003, and how he didn't pick us that year miss the obvious. There was no way to predict that Willis and Cabrera would be so good, and continue to be good throughout the season. We caught every break in the book, and some, like Bartman, that no one would believe if it was in a book. I think I'll go with Gammons opinion over anyone's on this board.808288[/snapback] Is this the same Gammons who said Mike Lowell was on his way to the Cubs? :plain
June 14, 200521 yr Gammons doesn't watch the team day in and day out like we do. That being said, I still like his optimism. :thumbup
June 14, 200521 yr Gammons knows a hell of a lot more than any of us here. Those that keep bringing up 2003, and how he didn't pick us that year miss the obvious. There was no way to predict that Willis and Cabrera would be so good, and continue to be good throughout the season. We caught every break in the book, and some, like Bartman, that no one would believe if it was in a book. I think I'll go with Gammons opinion over anyone's on this board.808288[/snapback] Is this the same Gammons who said Mike Lowell was on his way to the Cubs? :plain 808537[/snapback] Yup...that's the one. He's not right 100% of the time, maybe not even 50% of the time. Heck, Ted Williams only got a hit 40% of the time. Overall, there's 4 or 5 other writers that I like reading better. I just said Gammons opinion is a lot better than anyone on this board. He may not watch the team as closely as some of us do, but he's got knowledge, age and patence on his side. I don't agree with everything he says....in fact I strogly disagree about Mota....never liked him and I'd love to see us trade him. But I think he's right about our team overall.
June 14, 200521 yr Gammons knows a hell of a lot more than any of us here. Those that keep bringing up 2003, and how he didn't pick us that year miss the obvious. There was no way to predict that Willis and Cabrera would be so good, and continue to be good throughout the season. We caught every break in the book, and some, like Bartman, that no one would believe if it was in a book. I think I'll go with Gammons opinion over anyone's on this board.808288[/snapback] Is this the same Gammons who said Mike Lowell was on his way to the Cubs? :plain 808537[/snapback] Yup...that's the one. He's not right 100% of the time, maybe not even 50% of the time. Overall, there's 4 or 5 other writers that I like reading better. I just said Gammons opinion is a lot better than anyone on this board. He may not watch the team as closely as some of us do, but he's got knowledge, age and patence on his side. I don't agree with everything he says....in fact I strogly disagree about Mota....never liked him and I'd love to see us trade him. But I think he's right about our team overall. 808636[/snapback] Agreed there. I like the 1 hour show he does with Boog on Tuesdays especially.
June 14, 200521 yr Gammons knows a hell of a lot more than any of us here. Those that keep bringing up 2003, and how he didn't pick us that year miss the obvious. There was no way to predict that Willis and Cabrera would be so good, and continue to be good throughout the season. We caught every break in the book, and some, like Bartman, that no one would believe if it was in a book. I think I'll go with Gammons opinion over anyone's on this board.808288[/snapback] Is this the same Gammons who said Mike Lowell was on his way to the Cubs? :plain 808537[/snapback] Yup...that's the one. He's not right 100% of the time, maybe not even 50% of the time. Overall, there's 4 or 5 other writers that I like reading better. I just said Gammons opinion is a lot better than anyone on this board. He may not watch the team as closely as some of us do, but he's got knowledge, age and patence on his side. I don't agree with everything he says....in fact I strogly disagree about Mota....never liked him and I'd love to see us trade him. But I think he's right about our team overall. 808636[/snapback] Agreed there. I like the 1 hour show he does with Boog on Tuesdays especially. 808645[/snapback] Agreed :shifty
June 14, 200521 yr Hey you never know, I was pretty pleased with Mota tonight, sure he had absolutely no pressure, but that fast ball did look lively, and that breaking ball was working. I'd love to see Mota get on a role and pitch like he definatly is capable of.
June 14, 200521 yr Mota was hitting 95 in the Washington series but clearly that velocity didn't stop him from giving up quite a few runs
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.