No sex. That's part of a sentence imposed on a 17-old-girl by Texas state district judge Lauri Blake.

 

She's ordered the young drug offender not have sex as long as she is living with her parents and attending school, as a condition of her probation.

 

It is one of several unorthodox rulings Judge Lauri Blake has imposed since she was elected 10 months ago in the district court that covers Fannin and Grayson counties.

 

She has also prohibited tattoos, body piercings, earrings and clothing "associated with the drug culture" for those on probation.

 

Lawyers are also subject to her rulings. Blake has the told female attorneys not wear sleeveless shirts or show cleavage in her courtroom.

 

Blake agreed to an interview but later declined through her court coordinator.

 

Some wonder how she can enforce some of her conditions, such as the sex ban.

 

Former federal prosecutor Fred Moss said some conditions could be viewed as violating someone's personal dignity.

 

And Steve Blackburn, a lawyer involved with the Dallas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, said conditions that violate someone's constitutional rights are best avoided.

http://www.wftv.com/news/5040625/detail.html

Is there a monitoring device for this like the ankle monitor? :lol

Ever seen Robin Hood Men in Tights?

*makes note not to commit crimes in this judge's district*

She can be challenged for her rulings if someone wished to. Some of those orders violate civil Rights of the individual outlined.

 

It will be amusing to see what happens when that takes place.

Can they do that?

Hey, it is probation. If they don't agree they can go to jail and enjoy the conjugal time permitted.

Ever seen Robin Hood Men in Tights?

 

 

 

 

:lol That movie pwns.

gotta love stupid judges.

 

but they have nobody to blame but themselves, what do you expect from the idiots that gave you rick perry, george w bush, and all the rest of them....

I'm sure the ACLU is salivating at hearing this one.

I'm sure the ACLU is salivating at hearing this one.

 

 

 

The ACLU can suck on my chocolate salty balls.....

This is an true example of an "activist judge"

They should have had this woman rule over that teacher who had sex with her student. What would she do in that scenario?

It's unconstitutional to do this.