January 16, 200917 yr Josh Friedman tonight said what I've been saying for awhile. If you're going to give Jay Gibbons a chance...why not Barry Bonds? I think it's a joke that one of the best hitters of all-time isn't even getting a chance, when he's willing to play for the minimum. One of them was honest... BS more like one of them tested positive and had no way around it... With all of the evidence piled up it's pretty obvious that Bonds is guilty too.
January 16, 200917 yr Josh Friedman tonight said what I've been saying for awhile. If you're going to give Jay Gibbons a chance...why not Barry Bonds? I think it's a joke that one of the best hitters of all-time isn't even getting a chance, when he's willing to play for the minimum. One of them was honest... BS more like one of them tested positive and had no way around it... With all of the evidence piled up it's pretty obvious that Bonds is guilty too. You're not seriously defending Jay Gibbons are you? :lol What a joke...further proof that the media can brainwash a person to hate a specific person b/c of his greatness. At least Bonds was HOF caliber with or without steroids. Jay Gibbons...borderline big leaguer with steroids.
January 16, 200917 yr Josh Friedman tonight said what I've been saying for awhile. If you're going to give Jay Gibbons a chance...why not Barry Bonds? I think it's a joke that one of the best hitters of all-time isn't even getting a chance, when he's willing to play for the minimum. One of them was honest... BS more like one of them tested positive and had no way around it... With all of the evidence piled up it's pretty obvious that Bonds is guilty too. You're not seriously defending Jay Gibbons are you? :lol What a joke...further proof that the media can brainwash a person to hate a specific person b/c of his greatness. At least Bonds was HOF caliber with or without steroids. Jay Gibbons...borderline big leaguer with steroids. I fail to see your point. In fact, you didn't respond to my post at all. Since Gibbons admitted he took HGH, it isn't that big of a deal anymore...not that complicated Erick. Last time I checked, Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH, and until he does, he's not going to be playing ball anywhere (that is, if he doesn't end up in jail for perjury.) Stop whining every five seconds about wanting to have Bonds on this team. He's not coming here, nor is he going anywhere else. Get over it.
January 16, 200917 yr I fail to see your point. In fact, you didn't respond to my post at all. Since Gibbons admitted he took HGH, it isn't that big of a deal anymore...not that complicated Erick. Last time I checked, Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH, and until he does, he's not going to be playing ball anywhere (that is, if he doesn't end up in jail for perjury.) Stop whining every five seconds about wanting to have Bonds on this team. He's not coming here, nor is he going anywhere else. Get over it. I'm not whining wise guy...just stating a move that would actually help this team. As for "Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH..." does he have to? He hasn't been caught, and since I'm actually taking Government this year, one thing you learn is that this is America, and one is "innocent until proven guilty." Last I checked that applies to everyone...why not Bonds? B/c the media brainwashed you into hating the guy? He's a great hitter...HGH or not. And he's willing to play for the minimum (or so he says).
January 16, 200917 yr I'd assume him telling a court that he took the cream and the clear being enough proof for people. Kind of hard to go against that. It's not about if Bonds took steroids or not, it's about if Bonds "knowingly" took steroids or not. Although it has come out the the clear was legal at the time.
January 16, 200917 yr I'm not whining wise guy...just stating a move that would actually help this team. As for "Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH..." does he have to? He hasn't been caught, and since I'm actually taking Government this year, one thing you learn is that this is America, and one is "innocent until proven guilty." Last I checked that applies to everyone...why not Bonds? B/c the media brainwashed you into hating the guy? He's a great hitter...HGH or not. And he's willing to play for the minimum (or so he says). Enough with the "media brainwashing" nonsense. Whether the media agrees with it or not, Bonds is a liar. Yes, technically you are innocent until proven guilty in this country, but I think you are taking that into the wrong context. Just because someone hasn't been proven guilty yet, that doesn't necessarily make them innocent. When you have this much information on a specific case, when it is almost impossible to prove that Bonds is innocent of all charges, then people are going to assume he is guilty, just like Clemens, whether the media says is or not. The media's job is to display the information for the public to see...not to inform them what their opinion is going to/should be. An intelligent person is capable of forming their own opinion. Bonds would definitely help this team, no one is refuting that. But would he help this team in a mental sense? No. Does he "have to say that he took HGH"? Of course not, he can make his own decisions, it's just that eventually he will have to suffer the consequences.
January 16, 200917 yr I'm not whining wise guy...just stating a move that would actually help this team. As for "Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH..." does he have to? He hasn't been caught, and since I'm actually taking Government this year, one thing you learn is that this is America, and one is "innocent until proven guilty." Last I checked that applies to everyone...why not Bonds? B/c the media brainwashed you into hating the guy? He's a great hitter...HGH or not. And he's willing to play for the minimum (or so he says). Enough with the "media brainwashing" nonsense. Whether the media agrees with it or not, Bonds is a liar. Yes, technically you are innocent until proven guilty in this country, but I think you are taking that into the wrong context. Just because someone hasn't been proven guilty yet, that doesn't necessarily make them innocent. When you have this much information on a specific case, when it is almost impossible to prove that Bonds is innocent of all charges, then people are going to assume he is guilty, just like Clemens, whether the media says is or not. The media's job is to display the information for the public to see...not to inform them what their opinion is going to/should be. An intelligent person is capable to form an opinion of their own. Bonds would definitely help this team, no one is refuting that. But would he help this team in a mental sense? No. Does he "have to say that he took HGH"? Of course not, he can make his own decisions, it's just that eventually he will have to suffer the consequences. WTF does the bold even mean? Anyways, "Bonds is a liar" = an opinion. I'm pretty sure the Marlins don't care about the "mental sense" considering they just signed a mediocre cheater...at least Bonds is...well, a lot better. And the media's job isn't to display information for the public to see...that's where you're wrong. The media can easily brainwash people. It's the reason why guys like Bonds get all the publicity, while it's ok for scrubs like Jay Gibbons to "get away with it." With the media...there's always a double standard. Even between sports...baseball gets criticized a helluva lot more than say...football. For some reason, guys like Deuce McAllister, the Williams boys in Minnesota...for some reason, that news only lasted about a week. While for guys like Bonds and Clemens, they'll be bashed for it the rest of their lives.
January 16, 200917 yr I keep trying to figure where all these roster spots are coming from? I think this is the main point. EB, or Gaby, could go to AAA, but the pitching would be interesting. Anibal/Miller could go to the pen, but that bumps Cruz/Meyer/Kroenke/Delgado off the team. Of course the team could trade, or not care, about losing each of them. Could also stash Anibal or Miller in AAA and call them up on the first break down. Can always trade Cantu or McPherson as well. It would work, it would just be interesting.
January 16, 200917 yr I'm not whining wise guy...just stating a move that would actually help this team. As for "Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH..." does he have to? He hasn't been caught, and since I'm actually taking Government this year, one thing you learn is that this is America, and one is "innocent until proven guilty." Last I checked that applies to everyone...why not Bonds? B/c the media brainwashed you into hating the guy? He's a great hitter...HGH or not. And he's willing to play for the minimum (or so he says). Enough with the "media brainwashing" nonsense. Whether the media agrees with it or not, Bonds is a liar. Yes, technically you are innocent until proven guilty in this country, but I think you are taking that into the wrong context. Just because someone hasn't been proven guilty yet, that doesn't necessarily make them innocent. When you have this much information on a specific case, when it is almost impossible to prove that Bonds is innocent of all charges, then people are going to assume he is guilty, just like Clemens, whether the media says is or not. The media's job is to display the information for the public to see...not to inform them what their opinion is going to/should be. An intelligent person is capable to form an opinion of their own. Bonds would definitely help this team, no one is refuting that. But would he help this team in a mental sense? No. Does he "have to say that he took HGH"? Of course not, he can make his own decisions, it's just that eventually he will have to suffer the consequences. WTF does the bold even mean? Anyways, "Bonds is a liar" = an opinion. I'm pretty sure the Marlins don't care about the "mental sense" considering they just signed a mediocre cheater...at least Bonds is...well, a lot better. And the media's job isn't to display information for the public to see...that's where you're wrong. The media can easily brainwash people. It's the reason why guys like Bonds get all the publicity, while it's ok for scrubs like Jay Gibbons to "get away with it." With the media...there's always a double standard. Even between sports...baseball gets criticized a helluva lot more than say...football. For some reason, guys like Deuce McAllister, the Williams boys in Minnesota...for some reason, that news only lasted about a week. While for guys like Bonds and Clemens, they'll be bashed for it the rest of their lives. And what is it that Gibbons, McAllister, and the Williams boys all have in common? Oh yeah, they didn't commit perjury in court, unlike Bonds and Clemens. Honestly, this is a pointless argument. Do you really believe that either Bonds or Clemens are innocent? If you do, it's probably just out of pure stubborness. Enough with the excuses. The media doesn't "criticize" baseball more than football. They may not pay as much attention to it, but those are completely different. And to say that is the reason why Bonds and Clemens are bashed on a consistent basis is just...well...lunacy.
January 16, 200917 yr Josh Friedman tonight said what I've been saying for awhile. If you're going to give Jay Gibbons a chance...why not Barry Bonds? I think it's a joke that one of the best hitters of all-time isn't even getting a chance, when he's willing to play for the minimum. One of them was honest... BS more like one of them tested positive and had no way around it... With all of the evidence piled up it's pretty obvious that Bonds is guilty too. You're not seriously defending Jay Gibbons are you? :lol What a joke...further proof that the media can brainwash a person to hate a specific person b/c of his greatness. At least Bonds was HOF caliber with or without steroids. Jay Gibbons...borderline big leaguer with steroids. He was before w/o steriods with the Pirates he was probably gonna hit 500 HR anyway but he would have probably stole a hundred more bases without the performance enhancers still a HOF career but now he probably will be banned.
January 16, 200917 yr I'm not whining wise guy...just stating a move that would actually help this team. As for "Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH..." does he have to? He hasn't been caught, and since I'm actually taking Government this year, one thing you learn is that this is America, and one is "innocent until proven guilty." Last I checked that applies to everyone...why not Bonds? B/c the media brainwashed you into hating the guy? He's a great hitter...HGH or not. And he's willing to play for the minimum (or so he says). Enough with the "media brainwashing" nonsense. Whether the media agrees with it or not, Bonds is a liar. Yes, technically you are innocent until proven guilty in this country, but I think you are taking that into the wrong context. Just because someone hasn't been proven guilty yet, that doesn't necessarily make them innocent. When you have this much information on a specific case, when it is almost impossible to prove that Bonds is innocent of all charges, then people are going to assume he is guilty, just like Clemens, whether the media says is or not. The media's job is to display the information for the public to see...not to inform them what their opinion is going to/should be. An intelligent person is capable to form an opinion of their own. Bonds would definitely help this team, no one is refuting that. But would he help this team in a mental sense? No. Does he "have to say that he took HGH"? Of course not, he can make his own decisions, it's just that eventually he will have to suffer the consequences. WTF does the bold even mean? Anyways, "Bonds is a liar" = an opinion. I'm pretty sure the Marlins don't care about the "mental sense" considering they just signed a mediocre cheater...at least Bonds is...well, a lot better. And the media's job isn't to display information for the public to see...that's where you're wrong. The media can easily brainwash people. It's the reason why guys like Bonds get all the publicity, while it's ok for scrubs like Jay Gibbons to "get away with it." With the media...there's always a double standard. Even between sports...baseball gets criticized a helluva lot more than say...football. For some reason, guys like Deuce McAllister, the Williams boys in Minnesota...for some reason, that news only lasted about a week. While for guys like Bonds and Clemens, they'll be bashed for it the rest of their lives. And what is it that Gibbons, McAllister, and the Williams boys all have in common? Oh yeah, they didn't commit perjury in court, unlike Bonds and Clemens. Honestly, this is a pointless argument. Do you really believe that either Bonds or Clemens are innocent? If you do, it's probably just out of pure stubborness. Enough with the excuses. The media doesn't "criticize" baseball more than football. They may not pay as much attention to it, but those are completely different. And to say that is the reason why Bonds and Clemens are bashed on a consistent basis is just...well...lunacy. No, you're right. Half right, that is. The difference is also that Bonds and Clemens were great at what they did...the others...not so much. As for, "the media doesn't criticize baseball more than football..." teehee. ESPN is quickly becoming "The Football Network" with their College Football / NFL Live, year around. There are so many criminals in the NFL...yet, we rarely hear it. And I'm talking much worse than steroids.
January 16, 200917 yr I'm not whining wise guy...just stating a move that would actually help this team. As for "Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH..." does he have to? He hasn't been caught, and since I'm actually taking Government this year, one thing you learn is that this is America, and one is "innocent until proven guilty." Last I checked that applies to everyone...why not Bonds? B/c the media brainwashed you into hating the guy? He's a great hitter...HGH or not. And he's willing to play for the minimum (or so he says). Enough with the "media brainwashing" nonsense. Whether the media agrees with it or not, Bonds is a liar. Yes, technically you are innocent until proven guilty in this country, but I think you are taking that into the wrong context. Just because someone hasn't been proven guilty yet, that doesn't necessarily make them innocent. When you have this much information on a specific case, when it is almost impossible to prove that Bonds is innocent of all charges, then people are going to assume he is guilty, just like Clemens, whether the media says is or not. The media's job is to display the information for the public to see...not to inform them what their opinion is going to/should be. An intelligent person is capable to form an opinion of their own. Bonds would definitely help this team, no one is refuting that. But would he help this team in a mental sense? No. Does he "have to say that he took HGH"? Of course not, he can make his own decisions, it's just that eventually he will have to suffer the consequences. WTF does the bold even mean? Anyways, "Bonds is a liar" = an opinion. I'm pretty sure the Marlins don't care about the "mental sense" considering they just signed a mediocre cheater...at least Bonds is...well, a lot better. And the media's job isn't to display information for the public to see...that's where you're wrong. The media can easily brainwash people. It's the reason why guys like Bonds get all the publicity, while it's ok for scrubs like Jay Gibbons to "get away with it." With the media...there's always a double standard. Even between sports...baseball gets criticized a helluva lot more than say...football. For some reason, guys like Deuce McAllister, the Williams boys in Minnesota...for some reason, that news only lasted about a week. While for guys like Bonds and Clemens, they'll be bashed for it the rest of their lives. And what is it that Gibbons, McAllister, and the Williams boys all have in common? Oh yeah, they didn't commit perjury in court, unlike Bonds and Clemens. Honestly, this is a pointless argument. Do you really believe that either Bonds or Clemens are innocent? If you do, it's probably just out of pure stubborness. Enough with the excuses. The media doesn't "criticize" baseball more than football. They may not pay as much attention to it, but those are completely different. And to say that is the reason why Bonds and Clemens are bashed on a consistent basis is just...well...lunacy. No, you're right. Half right, that is. The difference is also that Bonds and Clemens were great at what they did...the others...not so much. As for, "the media doesn't criticize baseball more than football..." teehee. ESPN is quickly becoming "The Football Network" with their College Football / NFL Live, year around. There are so many criminals in the NFL...yet, we rarely hear it. And I'm talking much worse than steroids. It's football season, and the Super Bowl is in two weeks...if you watch ESPN frequently, you should know that they don't talk about football nearly as much during the summer. All they do during the summer on ESPN is show baseball highlights, so I don't see how you think baseball isn't promoted enough on ESPN. Their policy is, anything they show, they promote. You'll only have to deal with the all-football ESPN for about another few weeks. After that, besides NFL Live and CF Live, they barely talk about it unless something big happens.
January 16, 200917 yr It's football season, and the Super Bowl is in two weeks...if you watch ESPN frequently, you should know that they don't talk about football nearly as much during the summer. All they do during the summer on ESPN is show baseball highlights, so I don't see how you think baseball isn't promoted enough on ESPN. Their policy is, anything they show, they promote. You'll only have to deal with the all-football ESPN for about another few weeks. After that, besides NFL Live and CF Live, they barely talk about it unless something big happens. College football JUST ENDED, and they're talking about next year already...EVERY DAY...for half an hour...and then we get to see the repeats a couple times everyday, as well. Baseball doesn't get that kind of pub...neither does any other sport. Hockey doesn't even get covered; that's how much of a joke it (ESPN) is. It's year-round for crying out loud. FOR A COLLEGE SPORT.
January 16, 200917 yr College football JUST ENDED, and they're talking about next year already...EVERY DAY...for half an hour...and then we get to see the repeats a couple times everyday, as well. Baseball doesn't get that kind of pub...neither does any other sport. Hockey doesn't even get covered; that's how much of a joke it (ESPN) is. It's year-round for crying out loud. FOR A COLLEGE SPORT. Hey, don't bash college football, lol. I told you, if ESPN doesn't cover the sport, they don't promote it (i.e. hockey). They promote sports such as College FB + BB, NFL, MLB, NBA because they show all of their games. As for the excessive coverage, it is always like this this at this point in the year, since this was the last day for college players to declare for the NFL draft. After today, coverage will lessen by the day until the draft starts to come around. Baseball Tonight is on every night during the summer, and, as I already said, all they show on programs such as SC are baseball highlights when it's baseball season.
January 16, 200917 yr Did Barry Bonds take steroids? Yep. Did Barry Bonds lie about taking steroids? Yep. Is Barry Bonds a likable character? No, not at all. Can Barry Bonds hit? Yes. The last one is the only relevent one in the group, and for that reason, you sign him at league minimum and watch him flourish
January 16, 200917 yr Did Barry Bonds take steroids? Yep. Did Barry Bonds lie about taking steroids? Yep. Is Barry Bonds a likable character? No, not at all. Can Barry Bonds hit? Yes. The last one is the only relevent one in the group, and for that reason, you sign him at league minimum and watch him flourish :Batter :arms
January 16, 200917 yr Josh Friedman tonight said what I've been saying for awhile. If you're going to give Jay Gibbons a chance...why not Barry Bonds? I think it's a joke that one of the best hitters of all-time isn't even getting a chance, when he's willing to play for the minimum. I heard that too. But there is a huge difference between a nobody like Gibbons and Barry Bonds when it comes to steroids backlash. That said, as a noted Bonds hater, I'd take him on my team in a heartbeat. And where would he play, Rab? Certainly not in the Outfield. With the talk of Griffey not being able to play OF on a regular basis any more, well Bonds is even more of a liability out there. If he plays again, which I doubt he will, it will be as a DH in the AL. Even though he's willing to take a minimum deal, I don't see as how the Player's Union will let him.
January 16, 200917 yr If I owned the Marlins, either of those two would have to pay me a million a year to sit on my bench. The Marlins are now officially a young veteran team. No messing with that.
January 16, 200917 yr also I believe Bonds' trial is sometime during the season, I don't see any team wanting to deal with that.
January 16, 200917 yr I fail to see your point. In fact, you didn't respond to my post at all. Since Gibbons admitted he took HGH, it isn't that big of a deal anymore...not that complicated Erick. Last time I checked, Bonds still hasn't admitted that he took HGH, and until he does, he's not going to be playing ball anywhere (that is, if he doesn't end up in jail for perjury.) Stop whining every five seconds about wanting to have Bonds on this team. He's not coming here, nor is he going anywhere else. Get over it. Jay Gibbions HAD to admit it, he FAILED a test... why would Bonds admit something (whether he did it or not) if no test has proven he has? Guy was the most tested guy in baseball...
January 16, 200917 yr Jay Gibbions HAD to admit it, he FAILED a test... why would Bonds admit something (whether he did it or not) if no test has proven he has? Guy was the most tested guy in baseball... What are you talking about? Major League Baseball yesterday suspended Orioles outfielder Jay Gibbons and Kansas City Royals outfielder Jose Guillen 15 days each for violating the league's toughened substance-abuse prevention program, though neither failed a league-initiated drug test. http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/bal...0,1297055.story
January 16, 200917 yr Jay Gibbions HAD to admit it, he FAILED a test... why would Bonds admit something (whether he did it or not) if no test has proven he has? Guy was the most tested guy in baseball... What are you talking about? Major League Baseball yesterday suspended Orioles outfielder Jay Gibbons and Kansas City Royals outfielder Jose Guillen 15 days each for violating the league's toughened substance-abuse prevention program, though neither failed a league-initiated drug test. http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/bal...0,1297055.story What am I talking about.??. You were saying that at least Gibbons admitted to using compared to Bonds who denies it. Gibbons didn't admit sh*t, he flat out got CAUGHT with a failed test. Bonds has yet to fail a test publicly, that might change if this hearing/jury finds a BLACO positive test but until then he hasnt
January 16, 200917 yr Jay Gibbions HAD to admit it, he FAILED a test... why would Bonds admit something (whether he did it or not) if no test has proven he has? Guy was the most tested guy in baseball... What are you talking about? Major League Baseball yesterday suspended Orioles outfielder Jay Gibbons and Kansas City Royals outfielder Jose Guillen 15 days each for violating the league's toughened substance-abuse prevention program, though neither failed a league-initiated drug test. http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/bal...0,1297055.story What am I talking about.??. You were saying that at least Gibbons admitted to using compared to Bonds who denies it. Gibbons didn't admit sh*t, he flat out got CAUGHT with a failed test. Bonds has yet to fail a test publicly, that might change if this hearing/jury finds a BLACO positive test but until then he hasnt It says right there that he didn't fail a test. I wonder how he got caught though.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.