Jump to content

Mike Brown fired


yokofox33

Recommended Posts

If they wanted Steve Nash and Dwight Howard to succeed, D'Antoni was the right choice...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If they wanted the ENTIRE team to succeed, then they're idiots or Phil Jackson asked for so much that he basically forced their hand. I think it was a little of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they wanted Steve Nash and Dwight Howard to succeed, D'Antoni was the right choice..

If they wanted the ENTIRE team to succeed, then they're idiots or Phil Jackson asked for so much that he basically forced their hand. I think it was a little of both.

 

 

Jackson wanted too much-

Authority and consultation on personnel moves

10 million a year for two years

Roger Clemens like travel arraignments on the road

The ability to groom his own successor

 

 

That's a bit much, even though all of it will help the team and him in the long run. I wouldn't be surprised if Stern came down against those provisions, as the travel one and the pay probably would have set a bad precedent in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lakers choose Mike D'Antoni over Phil Jackson. Wow. Bobbob, tell me why this isn't insane.

 

 

Because they have Steve Nash and Dwight Howard. That's going to be unstoppable in the pick and roll, which is something that would happen very rarely in the triangle under Jackson.

 

Also, D'Antoni's an underrated defensive coach. People look at raw point totals, rather than efficiency, which made his Suns teams look worse. They were almost always above average in defensive efficiency. And he had the Knicks playing top-10 defense before he left last year.

 

From a tactical perspective, I think this is the right move. I vehemently disagree with Dim that this is the wrong move for the team.

 

Hiring a coach who takes the ball out of the hands of the point guard is f***ing insanity when you have Steve Nash.

 

Also, the "ringzzzz" argument is pretty stupid. Three of the last five championships have been won by coaches who had never won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they wanted Steve Nash and Dwight Howard to succeed, D'Antoni was the right choice...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If they wanted the ENTIRE team to succeed, then they're idiots or Phil Jackson asked for so much that he basically forced their hand. I think it was a little of both.

 

 

Makes no sense.

 

It's best for Nash/Howard, but not best for the team. Is the team the new definition for Kobe now? Because that's basically all they have (well, and Gasol).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's little reason to think Kobe will not absolutely thrive in D'Antoni's offense.

 

Go look at what he did for a young Joe Johnson and tell me Kobe can't be a hyper-elite version of that.

 

It's going to be beautiful.

 

The only piece that doesn't work is Gasol. Trade him for Josh Smith and Kyle Korver and oh my god.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yeah, I agree with your. They're going to be a juggernaut offensively, and it's going to help Kobe. He's a smart cutter and ball handler, there's little reason to think he will get squeezed out.

 

The only player who might get squeezed is Metta World Peace. Which will only help, because he's absolutely horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...