January 21, 200422 yr According to the Sun-Sentinel, our payroll now stands at $47.74M. With a month to go before Marlins pitchers and catchers report for spring training, the team has 17 players under contract for $36.74 million. That includes Lenny Harris and Gerald Williams, both of whom signed minor league deals. Add deferred money owed Pudge Rodriguez ($3 million) and Mike Hampton ($10 million) and subtract $2 million coming from the Rockies, and the Marlins' 2004 payroll stands at $47.74 million. We were expected to spend $60M for this year's team, which puts us about $12M under budget. We still have to round out our roster, I hope we dont slouch with this extra money - but dont overspend either. I hate to say it, but Maddux is still available, and there are a couple of arms still out there that are intriguing (Sauerbeck, Osuna, Astacio, Finley, Burkett, Veres, Person...). There is also Takatsu, a reliever from Japan which has drawn some interest: Takatsu, who turned 35 in November, surpassed Kazuhiro Sasaki for the all-time saves mark last season (260). They are the only Japanese pitchers with more than 200 career saves. Though the Marlins already have a closer in Armando Benitez, Takatsu is willing to accept a set-up role Taken from Sun-Sentinel.
January 21, 200422 yr The operative phrase in the article is "17 players under contract". Baseball teams must have 25 players on the active roster (plus guys on the disabled list plus guys signed to minor league contracts) so that number is short the salaries for eight (8) players. When all is said and done you can expect payroll to be around $53 million, plus or minus. Guys like Cabrera and Willis (to name a few) are not signed yet.
January 21, 200422 yr Maddux is no longer worth 10 million dollars, and don't waste your money on Person. Osuna (though injury prone) would be a decent pick up because he's not all that bad (his mother's health disturbed him all season), but you guys should of really signed Urbina to shore up that pen. I'm an Urbina fan, but come on, who doesn't like that change up?
January 21, 200422 yr Scott Sauerbeck had season ending shoulder surgery last week. LATEST NEWS - January 16 - Previous News Free agent Scott Sauerbeck reportedly will undergo shoulder surgery next week and miss the season. This could explain some of his problems from the second half of last season. Sauerbeck has failed physicals for both the Cubs and Reds this winter, forcing him to undergo surgery.
January 21, 200422 yr Beckett has yet to sign too. Josh made 1.725 last year. Will see a raise. Team isn't going after any big names now. Doesn't make sense and no big names are left, besides Maddux. As is, Marlins will contend. If team needs to add on, they have some cash put aside to make some modest upgrades. That 60 mil number has never been confirmed. It's always been an estimate.
January 21, 200422 yr guys like cabrera and willis not signed yet??? wut are i smokin? these guys are under their rookie contracts for at least 2 more years and are already signed for very little not even a million each
January 21, 200422 yr guys like cabrera and willis not signed yet??? wut are i smokin? these guys are under their rookie contracts for at least 2 more years and are already signed for very little not even a million each what is meant by "not signed yet" is that they don't have a salary figure for next year. They're not going anywhere (obviously) but their money isn't figured into the $47.74 mil figure...
January 21, 200422 yr Willis and Cabrera will add about another 800,000 to the payroll. Team could reward them with 400,000.
January 21, 200422 yr 46M sounds about right. Players without 2004 contracts: Beckett, Willis, Choi, Miggy, Spooney, Neal, Bump, Phelps, Neu. Marlins can sign them for any amount, but not less than 20% of their 2003 wage. Miggy and Willis won't make a million each, Pujols didn't even make that much. Think more 4 or 5 hundred thousand for them. Beckett somewhere between 2 and 2.5 million.
January 21, 200422 yr Does anyone have the details of contracts with the following: Conine, JP, Mordy, and Choi? Thanks!
January 21, 200422 yr Choi has no contract. We retain his rights and can offer him any deal. Mordecai has a base salary of 425K with incentives for games played. He'll most definetly reach the first one to get 500K and could get the full 600K. Conine's was never released. It's supposed to be heavily deferred. The Herald projected it to be worth 3 million this year. And Pierre has a 2.3M contract. Though it's not clear if his bonus for placing 10th in MVP voting was to paid at the end of last year or added to this year or both. He gets somewhere between 2.3 and 2.7M anyhow.
January 21, 200422 yr There is also Takatsu, a reliever from Japan which has drawn some interest: ? Takatsu, who turned 35 in November, surpassed Kazuhiro Sasaki for the all-time saves mark last season (260). They are the only Japanese pitchers with more than 200 career saves. Though the Marlins already have a closer in Armando Benitez, Takatsu is willing to accept a set-up role Taken from Sun-Sentinel. Takatsu has signed with ChiSox according to CBS sportsline
January 21, 200422 yr Willis and Cabrera will, at the most, make $350,000 each in 2004. With everyone signed, expect the payroll in-between $51-52 Million, but I invision one or two somewhat big pitcher signings, as well as a cheap starting-caliber outfielder or first baseman (Eric Karros). Orlando Hernandez is having workouts for teams at UM, and I would think he is a major possibility. I don't see us getting Takatsu, but Maels Rodriguez could be a quiet but huge possibility.
January 22, 200422 yr that maels rodriguez wants to much money. That Japenese guy sounds good at a low price. and I really think we should atleast give an offer to maddux and please please sign a lefty reliever. That's the biggest problem for this team. Spend but not to much. C'mon guys do something.
January 22, 200422 yr that maels rodriguez wants to much money. It's not what he wants that matters... :banghead
January 22, 200422 yr that maels rodriguez wants to much money. It's not what he wants that matters... :banghead Last thing I heard about this guy is that he wants a contract of 4 yrs 32 million and the yankees wanted him which is a big problem. I heard this like two weeks ago in a forum about him.
January 22, 200422 yr Last thing I heard about this guy is that he wants a contract of 4 yrs 32 million and the yankees wanted him which is a big problem. I heard this like two weeks ago in a forum about him. If you trust a forum (besides proven insiders, which no website has as credible insiders as this), then you are almost a pure idiot. One, every Cuban pitchers first choice to play is Miami. No doubt about it, there is no question. Two, he can want all he wants, but it's what's offered that matters. The Yankees won't offer another cuban pitcher as much as they did Contreras, especially a question mark such as Maels.
January 22, 200422 yr Author Sauerbeck going down sucks - for him...wow...see it does pay to sign early. Yes, I know we only have 17 players under contract - but you cant expect the rest of the roster to be filled out and cost us $12M. That said, Maddux would only be good for a year, in my opinion, because AJ will be fully recovered next season (no, I dont expect him to be his usual self this season which means NOT fully recovered) and Maddux would only force us to deal a starter or let Pavano go (which I am not willing to do, especially at how much it will cost to sign Maddux). In other words, I never expected Maddux to sign here, but the idea was gaining steam, at least in my mind. And yes, this $60M cap is not verified, only speculated. I have been saying that all offseason. Could be lower, could be higher. I think Loria is willing to go over for the right reason - which I dont see right now. No on Maels Rodriguez. Nothing more than a closer in most scouts books, and who knows about his durability - pitched 255IP+ last year. Too rich for us. Looks like we will be shoring up our team with ST invitees...still think there are some intriguing options out there - Chuck Finley (what is he, 40?!).
January 22, 200422 yr Last thing I heard about this guy is that he wants a contract of 4 yrs 32 million and the yankees wanted him which is a big problem. I heard this like two weeks ago in a forum about him. If you trust a forum (besides proven insiders, which no website has as credible insiders as this), then you are almost a pure idiot. Well maybe USAToday was the source: "The Yankees signed Contreras, 32, for four years and $32 million. Rodriguez is 24, his age verified by Olympic records. He is looking to sign for terms comparable to those Contreras received, a long shot given some of the questions surrounding him." USAToday Link Children should be see and not heard.
January 22, 200422 yr Well maybe USAToday was the source: "The Yankees signed Contreras, 32, for four years and $32 million. Rodriguez is 24, his age verified by Olympic records. He is looking to sign for terms comparable to those Contreras received, a long shot given some of the questions surrounding him." USAToday Link Children should be see and not heard. For one, I'd like to get this off my chest: What is your problem? Of all the 14-year-olds on this board, you choose to pick on me, and in most cases, for no good reason. Do you feel like a big man now? You're choosing to prey on a person of lesser stature? Second of all, If you could have properly comprehended my post, I said, "If you trust a forum," meaning if the info he had recieved was from a forum, then he's an idiot. Go back to, let's say, 9th grade english. To get back on topic, like I said, he can want all he wants, but it's what's being offered that counts.
January 22, 200422 yr Well maybe USAToday was the source: "The Yankees signed Contreras, 32, for four years and $32 million. Rodriguez is 24, his age verified by Olympic records. He is looking to sign for terms comparable to those Contreras received, a long shot given some of the questions surrounding him." USAToday Link Children should be see and not heard. For one, I'd like to get this off my chest: What is your problem? Of all the 14-year-olds on this board, you choose to pick on me, and in most cases, for no good reason. Do you feel like a big man now? You're choosing to prey on a person of lesser stature? Second of all, If you could have properly comprehended my post, I said, "If you trust a forum," meaning if the info he had recieved was from a forum, then he's an idiot. Go back to, let's say, 9th grade english. To get back on topic, like I said, he can want all he wants, but it's what's being offered that counts. Since you asked I'll answer your question. You are a bully. A know-it-all. If someone disagrees with you they are an idiot or a fool or moron or whatever denigrating word crosses your undeveloped little brain. Everyone's opinion has value. Find a better way to disagree, in a more polite and respectful manner and you won't find me saying word.
January 22, 200422 yr Since you asked I'll answer your question. You are a bully. A know-it-all. If someone disagrees with you they are an idiot or a fool or moron or whatever denigrating word crosses your undeveloped little brain. Everyone's opinion has value. Find a better way to disagree, in a more polite and respectful manner and you won't find me saying word. Since you answered I'll ask another: Why attack me? Why not attempt to show up others that can be classified as "bullies", such as Das or Ramp? Just because I'm 14-years-old, it may be easier? Or you won't be repremanded for your comments? Most likely both. I'm sorry, but if I here an ignorant comment (although this particular post was not very stupid, if you believe everything you read, you're just a little too gulible (sp) ).
January 22, 200422 yr Since you asked I'll answer your question. You are a bully. A know-it-all. If someone disagrees with you they are an idiot or a fool or moron or whatever denigrating word crosses your undeveloped little brain. Everyone's opinion has value. Find a better way to disagree, in a more polite and respectful manner and you won't find me saying word. Since you answered I'll ask another: Why attack me? Why not attempt to show up others that can be classified as "bullies", such as Das or Ramp? Just because I'm 14-years-old, it may be easier? Or you won't be repremanded for your comments? Most likely both. I'm sorry, but if I here an ignorant comment (although this particular post was not very stupid, if you believe everything you read, you're just a little too gulible (sp) ). I don't believe everything that I read it's just that someone wrote it and I thought it was true. Sorry and DON'T CALL ME AN IDIOT!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.