Posted April 26, 200519 yr Why don't we drop Carlos Delgado to the 5th spot in the order and see what happens? Make it something like this 1-Pierre 2-Castillo 3-Encarnacion 4-Cabrera 5-Delgado 6-Lowell 7-Lo Duca 8-Gonzalez 9-pitcher my explanation is that castillo and pierre as legit lead off hitters are always going to give the pitcher a hard time, add the new and improved patient encarnacion and u got a head ache for the opposing pitcher, which can be enough for Cabrera, Delgado, Lowell, and then Lo Duca to tear up right after, what do you think, it's an idea, and I like what I see on paper, can we really put this into play in an actual game?
April 26, 200519 yr You don't pay a guy $52 million and have a thread about moving him down in the line-up. Delgado could be batting clean-up though. Your topic is stupid. :ban
April 26, 200519 yr From the Forum Guidelines: 3)There will be no posts meant to offend or hurt any other member, in a manner which is offensive or inflammatory. By the way, it's "You're"... :whistle
April 26, 200519 yr Too early. Moving him to the 3 hole has worked out for the most part. 755073[/snapback] I agree.
April 26, 200519 yr I've read worse ideas here. That said what we have right now seems to be working, let's file this idea for future consideration depending on how Enc, Lowell and Delgado do on this roadtrip. There is some merit to it.
April 26, 200519 yr You don't pay a guy $52 million and have a thread about moving him down in the line-up. Delgado could be batting clean-up though. Your topic is stupid. :ban 755055[/snapback] From the Forum Guidelines: 3)There will be no posts meant to offend or hurt any other member, in a manner which is offensive or inflammatory. By the way, it's "You're"... :whistle 755061[/snapback] you are topic is stupid???? i don't think so. ihe had it right.
April 26, 200519 yr you are topic is stupid???? i don't think so. ihe had it right. The original post sayed " :ban Your Stupid" , I changed it after about a minute. your topic is stupid.
April 26, 200519 yr Actually, the original post was Your stupid. :ban I pointed out the forum guideline (and the grammar), and he completely changed the meaning of the post, from a personal insult to what you see now. And back to the original topic, I don't think I would bat Encarnacion quite that high. It is encouraging that he is producing out of the 5/6/7 slots (where we haven't had too much since Lowell and Gonzalez are stuggling). I think we have a better balanced lineup when Encarnacion is in the bottom half to pick up some of the slack.
April 26, 200519 yr Why the would we drop Delgado in the lineup? The offense was anemic with him batting cleanup, when we moved him UP in the lineup to the 3-hold the offense really picked up well. No sense in moving him down to 5th.
April 26, 200519 yr If Lowell were hitting well the maybe this idea would work, but Delgado is fine in the 3 spot
April 26, 200519 yr Actually, the original post was Your stupid. :ban I pointed out the forum guideline (and the grammar), and he completely changed the meaning of the post, from a personal insult to what you see now. And back to the original topic, I don't think I would bat Encarnacion quite that high. It is encouraging that he is producing out of the 5/6/7 slots (where we haven't had too much since Lowell and Gonzalez are stuggling). I think we have a better balanced lineup when Encarnacion is in the bottom half to pick up some of the slack. 755122[/snapback] FORUM GUIDELINES 6)All posts are property of the poster. This forum and all web sites owned in conjunction with this forum have the right to request alteration or deletion of any offensive post. Posts may be deleted for any reasons the forum administrators deem reasonable. This post was made because the topic is stupid. Your opinion is that it is offensive. If the topic poster thought that it was offensive then I would edit it. If I walked up to you on the street and sayed something to you it's covered by the 1st Amendment.
April 26, 200519 yr Actually, the original post was Your stupid. :ban I pointed out the forum guideline (and the grammar), and he completely changed the meaning of the post, from a personal insult to what you see now. And back to the original topic, I don't think I would bat Encarnacion quite that high. It is encouraging that he is producing out of the 5/6/7 slots (where we haven't had too much since Lowell and Gonzalez are stuggling). I think we have a better balanced lineup when Encarnacion is in the bottom half to pick up some of the slack. 755122[/snapback] FORUM GUIDELINES 6)All posts are property of the poster. This forum and all web sites owned in conjunction with this forum have the right to request alteration or deletion of any offensive post. Posts may be deleted for any reasons the forum administrators deem reasonable. This post was made because the topic is stupid. Your opinion is that it is offensive. If the topic poster thought that it was offensive then I would edit it. If I walked up to you on the street and sayed something to you it's covered by the 1st Amendment. 755201[/snapback] I fully support your right to be a jerk.
April 26, 200519 yr I would love it if once in a while delgado would lay down bunts down the third base line. It'll mess with the shift so much that opponents will go nuts. I know that everytime hes up there theres a potential for an extra base hit, but wouldnt it be sweet if he would butn to that side, i mean the way they shift on him sometimes a one legged man could beat out the bunt.
April 27, 200519 yr Yeah hey thread starter just so you know we are, 6-2 since moving Delgado to the 3 spot so STFU
April 27, 200519 yr You don't pay a guy $52 million and have a thread about moving him down in the line-up. Delgado could be batting clean-up though. Your topic is stupid. :ban 755055[/snapback] Look who's talking about stupid topics and posts.
April 27, 200519 yr Damn money ball you took my night of the loss subforum and topics out of your sig that really crushes me
April 27, 200519 yr Author I don't appreciate the stupid comment, but anyway I thought it was a good idea since ENC has been more patient. 52 million or not, the top of the order needs to consist of contact, cabrera is proven at the 4th spot, delgado in the fifth spot can do what Andrew Jones does for the Braves.
April 27, 200519 yr I don't appreciate the stupid comment, but anyway I thought it was a good idea since ENC has been more patient. 52 million or not, the top of the order needs to consist of contact, cabrera is proven at the 4th spot, delgado in the fifth spot can do what Andrew Jones does for the Braves. 756025[/snapback] I'm agreeing with you here. When (not IF, WHEN) Delgado catches fire he can move back up to 3rd/4th...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.