Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Juan Pierre CF 1, 19, .255

Luis Castillo 2B 2, 14, .323

Miguel Cabrera LF 14, 53, .332

Carlos Delgado 1B 14, 55, .318

Mike Lowell 3B 3, 29, .219

Paul Lo Duca C 2, 29, .298

Juan Encarnacion RF 9, 40, .269

Alex Gonzalez SS 4, 26, .279

Brian Moehler P 0, 2, .105

 

Go Fish! Go Ted!

 

:thumbup

No Willy. :confused

I want Willy traded now. f***ers.

Treanor'd

 

dumb

 

Oh well get it done

If willy is traded some of the members of this board would slip into a Coma

Can't believe Willy is not in the line-up.

I'm really disgusted with Jack.

If he is frightened by the Braves, why didn't he play Willingham last night?

I senses senility. And I'm getting impatient.

I rather much have see Willy out there than Encarnacion or Conine. I think this guy has the potential to be another Cabrera

Willy will not play over Conine, Lowell, or Enc (at least for now)

 

That's Jack for you. Take the good with the bad

  • Author

F* Willy...

 

:shifty

Willy will not play over Conine, Lowell, or Enc (at least for now)

 

That's Jack for you. Take the good with the bad

828401[/snapback]

And when does he earn his WINGS. Sitting on the bench like Dillon?

Mismanagement, through-out.

If willy is traded some of the members of this board would slip into a Coma

828398[/snapback]

I'll have a new favorite team.

I'd rather have Willy in a team that uses him instead of miss use his talent in a bench. :(

  • Author

If willy is traded some of the members of this board would slip into a Coma

828398[/snapback]

I'll have a new favorite team.

828405[/snapback]

 

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out...

f*** you

Whats the big deal with Willy?

Willy has proved nothing on the major league level.

The question should be why did the FO bring him up when they know he was not going to play. When the owner, GM and manager say in a team meeting that they would stick with pretty much a set, original line up, what do you expect. They are going to try to win with what they envisioned to be their everyday line up.

 

Senility?

I dunno if 13 homers in 33 games is not impressive then you let me know. And if a 1.000+ obs is not then theres nothing big about this guy.

I senses senility. And I'm getting impatient.

828399[/snapback]

 

I senses that you are a moron.

I dunno if 13 homers in 33 games is not impressive then you let me know. And if a 1.000+ obs is not then theres nothing big about this guy.

828417[/snapback]

 

You act like that will translate exactly into the majors.

I dunno if 13 homers in 33 games is not impressive then you let me know. And if a 1.000+ obs is not then theres nothing big about this guy.

828417[/snapback]

 

You act like that will translate exactly into the majors.

828439[/snapback]

Well when someone hits for those numbers that what your suppose to do bring him up to the majors and see what happens. Hes been brought up but has not been given almost any atbats.

You people are waaayy too obsessed with Willingham. Sure he has great numbers, but it is TRIPLE A, and more importantly, it is in a ballpark(Albuquerque) where EVERYONE hits. Albuquerque is a city which is thousands of feet above sea level (like Colorado) so the offensive numbers are going to be better than they should be.

 

Josh Willingham is nothing special and shouldn't be starting ahead of PROVEN major leaguers...

I'm good with this lineup. We need a strong start to this series, and this lineup gives up our best chance.

You people are waaayy too obsessed with Willingham. Sure he has great numbers, but it is TRIPLE A, and more importantly, it is in a ballpark(Albuquerque) where EVERYONE hits. Albuquerque is a city which is thousands of feet above sea level (like Colorado) so the offensive numbers are going to be better than they should be.

 

Josh Willingham is nothing special and shouldn't be starting ahead of PROVEN major leaguers...

828452[/snapback]

he was hitting for power in Carolina too

 

and the only way to become a proven major leaguer is to get some PT, no?

You people are waaayy too obsessed with Willingham. Sure he has great numbers, but it is TRIPLE A, and more importantly, it is in a ballpark(Albuquerque) where EVERYONE hits. Albuquerque is a city which is thousands of feet above sea level (like Colorado) so the offensive numbers are going to be better than they should be.

 

Josh Willingham is nothing special and shouldn't be starting ahead of PROVEN major leaguers...

828452[/snapback]

he was hitting for power in Carolina too

 

and the only way to become a proven major leaguer is to get some PT, no?

828476[/snapback]

 

 

True, but check the triple A stats. There are tons of guys there with good stats. Should we give them all a shot? No. We are fighting to win the NL East and need to use our proven guys. It doesn't help that Willingham is a liability defensively...

You people are waaayy too obsessed with Willingham. Sure he has great numbers, but it is TRIPLE A, and more importantly, it is in a ballpark(Albuquerque) where EVERYONE hits. Albuquerque is a city which is thousands of feet above sea level (like Colorado) so the offensive numbers are going to be better than they should be.

 

Josh Willingham is nothing special and shouldn't be starting ahead of PROVEN major leaguers...

828452[/snapback]

he was hitting for power in Carolina too

 

and the only way to become a proven major leaguer is to get some PT, no?

828476[/snapback]

 

 

True, but check the triple A stats. There are tons of guys there with good stats. Should we give them all a shot? No. We are fighting to win the NL East and need to use our proven guys. It doesn't help that Willingham is a liability defensively...

828495[/snapback]

why do I need to see his Triple A stats? I know what he can do. Willingham is just a liability at catcher and is improved from last year(not saying much)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...