Admin Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 Minor-league deal and ST invite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wild blue Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 A lefty back-up outfielder? Interesting choice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Altamonte Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 Can play CF has Major league experience...good signing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted January 11, 2015 Author Share Posted January 11, 2015 He's this year's Reed Johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Ram Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 What do hi defensive numbers look like? I liked Nate S. as an option better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted January 12, 2015 Author Share Posted January 12, 2015 What do hi defensive numbers look like? I liked Nate S. as an option better. Nate would still be in play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlins_09 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 I love it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerhead Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerhead Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlins_09 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to. He has just as much pop if not more than Ruggiano. I'll take that from my 4th-5th OFer any day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to. And also 1 at Turner, 1 at Safeco, 1 at AT&T, 1 at Busch, and 1 at Nationals Park. [And also 1 at US Cellular] Are you even going to address the 139 being "almost as many" as 358? Cause I mean ... *shrug* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerhead Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to. And also 1 at Turner, 1 at Safeco, 1 at AT&T, 1 at Busch, and 1 at Nationals Park. [And also 1 at US Cellular] Are you even going to address the 139 being "almost as many" as 358? Cause I mean ... *shrug* So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks. He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on. And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlins_09 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks. He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on. And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it. Have you you ever watched Colvin play or are you just using stats to make decisions for you? He has a good amount of pop so I'm guessing the latter. Side note: Kinda funny that you say he isn't starting so it doesn't matter....and your name is benched. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks. He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on. And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it. 6 of his 20 = 30% of home runs that year not at hitters parks. And half of those were at cavernous ballparks. You're right, he won't be starting, which is why I'm cool with this signing and why I said "he has decent pop". Monkey feet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollythewog Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Nah dawg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 He may not even make the team. Let's relax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted January 14, 2015 Author Share Posted January 14, 2015 He may not even make the team. Let's relax. NO I WILL NOT RELAX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlins_09 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 He may not even make the team. Let's relax. Ok Aaron Rodgers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.