January 12, 201511 yr Author What do hi defensive numbers look like? I liked Nate S. as an option better. Nate would still be in play
January 13, 201511 yr Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two.
January 14, 201511 yr Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors.
January 14, 201511 yr Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to.
January 14, 201511 yr Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to. He has just as much pop if not more than Ruggiano. I'll take that from my 4th-5th OFer any day
January 14, 201511 yr Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to. And also 1 at Turner, 1 at Safeco, 1 at AT&T, 1 at Busch, and 1 at Nationals Park. [And also 1 at US Cellular] Are you even going to address the 139 being "almost as many" as 358? Cause I mean ... *shrug*
January 14, 201511 yr Has half-decent power, too [20 HR in 2010, 18 in 2012]. I can dig it. Wrigley, brah. He got almost as many ABs in SF last year and hit a whopping two. 139 is "almost as many" as 358? Wow, how am I in Calculus 3 without ever knowing this simple math? I am so dumb. I guess 11 < 9, too, because in 2010, he had 11 homers away from Wrigley (guess where the 9 came from). 2012 you have more of a point, 11 of his 18 homers came at Coors. 9 at Wrigley, 2 at Minute Maid, 1 at GABP, 2 at Miller. And yeah, 2012 I'm not even going to go in to. And also 1 at Turner, 1 at Safeco, 1 at AT&T, 1 at Busch, and 1 at Nationals Park. [And also 1 at US Cellular] Are you even going to address the 139 being "almost as many" as 358? Cause I mean ... *shrug* So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks. He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on. And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it.
January 14, 201511 yr So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks. He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on. And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it. Have you you ever watched Colvin play or are you just using stats to make decisions for you? He has a good amount of pop so I'm guessing the latter. Side note: Kinda funny that you say he isn't starting so it doesn't matter....and your name is benched.
January 14, 201511 yr So 14 at hitters parks vs 6 at not (quite) hitters parks. He doesn't have a lot of power. It's cool. He's not starting. So it doesn't really matter. He's decent bench fodder. Move on. And as for the ABs, I looked at the wrong column. There. I said it. 6 of his 20 = 30% of home runs that year not at hitters parks. And half of those were at cavernous ballparks. You're right, he won't be starting, which is why I'm cool with this signing and why I said "he has decent pop". Monkey feet.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.