July 5, 201610 yr Salary floor is a fine idea, but I don't care about it enough to have a strong opinion. Salary cap, on the other hand? No, never. I hate the idea of a salary cap, and it has done absolutely nothing in terms of parity in other sports. Luxury tax/revenue sharing is fine.
July 18, 201610 yr i'd love to have a salary floor as well that's tied to revenue sharing although i don't see it happening. Please open the possibility of trading draft picks! I am not in favor of automatically voiding a contract for a PED violation - I'd like it to be a team option and not something that's automatic.
July 18, 201610 yr i'd love to have a salary floor as well that's tied to revenue sharing although i don't see it happening. Please open the possibility of trading draft picks! I am not in favor of automatically voiding a contract for a PED violation - I'd like it to be a team option and not something that's automatic. I can guarantee you if it's a team option, they'll pull the trigger on that every time.
July 19, 201610 yr I can guarantee you if it's a team option, they'll pull the trigger on that every time. i highly doubt it would be 100% of the time - maybe pretty close to it but ultimately it should be up to the team
July 19, 201610 yr All balls and strikes determined by computer. Ump has earpiece that says what to call. Get rid of buster Posey rule.
July 19, 201610 yr Such a rule would observe the appeal process. If the appeal fails, then that contract should become void. The current system is terribly broken because teams are on the hook for a contract that was signed because of PED inflated numbers. And we want this because it hurts Loria?
July 29, 201610 yr If PEDS automatically void contracts, good players on team-friendly deals would gladly take an 80-game suspension to sign elsewhere for likely more guaranteed money. The void has to be a team option for this reason more than any other, I think.
July 29, 201610 yr They need to fix that stupid running out of the first base line rule that defies logic.
July 29, 201610 yr Pitchers need to face more than 1 batter. I hope this is what they do instead of having a limit to the number of pitching changes per inning. There are times, rare times but they do exist, when managers need to make multiple pitching changes. That should not go away. Having pitchers face more than one batter is a better fix but it doesn't hinder the manager or the defensive team as much if a pitcher is struggling.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.