April 17, 20179 yr What about it? It was shit and should never be seen again. It made them look like construction workers in hard hats. I agree
April 17, 20179 yr What about it? It was shit and should never be seen again. It made them look like construction workers in hard hats. Then it's appropriate it was only worn in one game, right after construction was completed on the ballpark.
April 17, 20179 yr Then it's appropriate it was only worn in one game, right after construction was completed on the ballpark. Good point
April 17, 20179 yr Then it's appropriate it was only worn in one game, right after construction was completed on the ballpark. Holy crap. You just blew my mind. Maybe they actually were construction hard hats?
April 17, 20179 yr 4 times. Twice in 2012 twice in 2014. Looked great. Where did you find this !? mlbhat.com !?
April 17, 20179 yr Where did you find this !? mlbhat.com !? google has plenty of images on it ... but that pic is from sportslogos.net
April 17, 20179 yr More importantly, how about the orange helmet? I'm wearing a Orange condom does that help?
April 17, 20179 yr google has plenty of images on it ... but that pic is from sportslogos.net With the date of the game !? wow !!
April 17, 20179 yr What about it? It was shit and should never be seen again. It made them look like construction workers in hard hats. wearing the orange helmet with black jersey was a bad idea. I'm pretty sure suit up with white jerseys it would have looked clean same as the hats
April 17, 20179 yr With the date of the game !? wow !! It was feature on the site when Marlins moved away from the orange caps
April 17, 20179 yr 4 times. Twice in 2012 twice in 2014. Looked great. Sadly,all these four players no more on the team…
April 17, 20179 yr Prepare to be very surprised. What reason would a new owner have to not put their own fingerprint on things? We aren't talking an iconic dodger or cub logo here.
April 17, 20179 yr What about it? It was shit and should never be seen again. It made them look like construction workers in hard hats. Great. Now you are going to open this joint up to a lawsuit from construction workers.
April 17, 20179 yr What reason would a new owner have to not put their own fingerprint on things? We aren't talking an iconic dodger or cub logo here. Maybe the new owner doesn't mind the current look and doesn't care to change it outside of a few tweaks. Of course they could make changes but the assumption that people seem to be making is that the new owner will hate the current look and their first priority will be to reband the team on day one and I don't think that will happen.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.