Jump to content


Lieberman Calls For Wider Use Of Surveillance Cameras Across Country


Passion
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), the chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, said Sunday he wants to ?more widely? use surveillance cameras across the country.

 

?The Brits have got something smart going in England, and it was part of why I believe they were able to so quickly apprehend suspects in the terrorist acts over the weekend, and that is they have cameras all over London and other of their major cities,? Lieberman said.

 

?I think it?s just common sense to do that here much more widely,? he added. ?And of course, we can do it without compromising anybody?s real privacy.?

 

Lieberman lamented the ?petty, partisan fighting? in Congress and called on his colleagues to join together to upgrade the nation?s electronic surveillance capabilities.

 

?Right now, we?re at a partisan gridlock over the question of whether the American government can listen into conversations or follow e-mail trails of non-American citizen,? he said on ABC?s This Week with George Stephanopoulos. ?That?s wrong. We?ve got to solve that problem, pass a law to give the people working for us the ability to protect us.?

 

Lieberman, who is more closely aligned with the GOP than the Democrats he caucuses with on the war in Iraq and many national security issues and insisted Sunday that the surge in Iraq is working.

 

?You might say that, in Iraq, we?ve got the enemy on the run, but for some reason, in Washington, a lot of politicians are on the run to order a retreat by our troops even as they are beginning to succeed,? he said.

 

Lieberman stated it is not fair to conclude that he is more likely to endorse a Republican for president.

 

But he added that ?so far I would say that Democratic candidates, in the larger questions of American security, have been disappointing, and I hope things will get better as this goes on.?

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/lieber...2007-07-01.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


...whether the American government can listen into conversations or follow e-mail trails of non-American citizen," he said on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos. "That's wrong. We've got to solve that problem, pass a law to give the people working for us the ability to protect us."

 

Wow...just wow. Let's get this clear now. He isn't talking about suspected terrorists. He is saying all non-citizens, ie legal residents, etc. Joe needs to read his Bill of Rights:

 

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..." SCOTUS has said that includes non-citizens.

 

This man has gone off the deep end. He really has no clue anymore. Doesn't he still believe there is a link between 9-11 and Iraq?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...whether the American government can listen into conversations or follow e-mail trails of non-American citizen," he said on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos. "That's wrong. We've got to solve that problem, pass a law to give the people working for us the ability to protect us."

 

Wow...just wow. Let's get this clear now. He isn't talking about suspected terrorists. He is saying all non-citizens, ie legal residents, etc. Joe needs to read his Bill of Rights:

 

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..." SCOTUS has said that includes non-citizens.

 

But if you're not doing anything wrong you shouldn't have anything to fear! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's already surveillance in public places, so he wants more.

 

How is that violating your rights?

 

Just because it doesn't violate your rights, doesn't make it ok. That's the tragic side effect of this presidency and people like Lieberman. The standard has been lowered to what is illegal, not what is right or wrong.

 

Plus England is in a much different position than us in terms of surveillance. More cities, more sites, more people, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's already surveillance in public places, so he wants more.

 

How is that violating your rights?

 

Just because it doesn't violate your rights, doesn't make it ok. That's the tragic side effect of this presidency and people like Lieberman. The standard has been lowered to what is illegal, not what is right or wrong.

 

Plus England is in a much different position than us in terms of surveillance. More cities, more sites, more people, etc.

 

Not saying I'm for it. I hate surveillance.

 

I was just clarifying given some of the responses on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...