September 4, 200817 yr Currently the idea of the Brewers swapping Prince Fielder for Matt Cain is just fun speculation. However, it is true the Brewers will listen on Fielder (he is about to get expensive). The Giants are known to like the big first baseman. The hangup is Brian Sabean's reported unwillingness to trade Tim Lincecum or Cain. Do u think it would be worth pursueing Prince if we could get him for a young, top quality arm? I highly doubt we would go after him due to cost but im just throwing the idea around to see what u guys think
September 4, 200817 yr no thank you prince has mad power but we need some1 who can A. Scoop a Ball b. Run the bases in 17 seocnds c. Dosent throw a hissy fit every time he pops out 4. Dosent eat the whole buffet before the team gets to it
September 5, 200817 yr Author no thank you prince has mad power but we need some1 who can A. Scoop a Ball b. Run the bases in 17 seocnds c. Dosent throw a hissy fit every time he pops out 4. Dosent eat the whole buffet before the team gets to it Just serve meat - he is a vegetarian LOL
September 5, 200817 yr hahaha yea but prince is a negative especially because of that contract he'll want 3 years 35 Mil and 10 Pounds of Vegetables before every game
September 5, 200817 yr the only way i would trade for prince is if the organization decided they want to spend some money and sign prince long term. i'd definitely do miller for prince but the brewers would want more and i wouldn't be willing to give up anymore top prospects.
September 5, 200817 yr the only way i would trade for prince is if the organization decided they want to spend some money and sign prince long term. i'd definitely do miller for prince but the brewers would want more and i wouldn't be willing to give up anymore top prospects. I don't know, the Brewers would definitely be more than intrigued by Andrew Miller for Prince Fielder.
September 5, 200817 yr i personally rather keep miller...but whatever is best for this organization i'll go with it
September 5, 200817 yr the only way i would trade for prince is if the organization decided they want to spend some money and sign prince long term. i'd definitely do miller for prince but the brewers would want more and i wouldn't be willing to give up anymore top prospects. I wouldn't...
September 5, 200817 yr Currently the idea of the Brewers swapping Prince Fielder for Matt Cain is just fun speculation. However, it is true the Brewers will listen on Fielder (he is about to get expensive). The Giants are known to like the big first baseman. The hangup is Brian Sabean's reported unwillingness to trade Tim Lincecum or Cain. Do u think it would be worth pursueing Prince if we could get him for a young, top quality arm? I highly doubt we would go after him due to cost but im just throwing the idea around to see what u guys think You say he's just about to become "expensive" and then mention the Marlins as a possiblity. Helllllllloooooooooooooooo :whistle :whistle :whistle Have you checked lately, but the Marlins don't aquire expensive talent, but get rid of it...... :banghead :banghead :banghead Was this poster real or a troll ?
September 5, 200817 yr Author Currently the idea of the Brewers swapping Prince Fielder for Matt Cain is just fun speculation. However, it is true the Brewers will listen on Fielder (he is about to get expensive). The Giants are known to like the big first baseman. The hangup is Brian Sabean's reported unwillingness to trade Tim Lincecum or Cain. Do u think it would be worth pursueing Prince if we could get him for a young, top quality arm? I highly doubt we would go after him due to cost but im just throwing the idea around to see what u guys think You say he's just about to become "expensive" and then mention the Marlins as a possiblity. Helllllllloooooooooooooooo :whistle :whistle :whistle Have you checked lately, but the Marlins don't aquire expensive talent, but get rid of it...... :banghead :banghead :banghead Was this poster real or a troll ? The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw.
September 5, 200817 yr Currently the idea of the Brewers swapping Prince Fielder for Matt Cain is just fun speculation. However, it is true the Brewers will listen on Fielder (he is about to get expensive). The Giants are known to like the big first baseman. The hangup is Brian Sabean's reported unwillingness to trade Tim Lincecum or Cain. Do u think it would be worth pursueing Prince if we could get him for a young, top quality arm? I highly doubt we would go after him due to cost but im just throwing the idea around to see what u guys think You say he's just about to become "expensive" and then mention the Marlins as a possiblity. Helllllllloooooooooooooooo :whistle :whistle :whistle Have you checked lately, but the Marlins don't aquire expensive talent, but get rid of it...... :banghead :banghead :banghead Was this poster real or a troll ? You should probably find another team.
September 5, 200817 yr Author Currently the idea of the Brewers swapping Prince Fielder for Matt Cain is just fun speculation. However, it is true the Brewers will listen on Fielder (he is about to get expensive). The Giants are known to like the big first baseman. The hangup is Brian Sabean's reported unwillingness to trade Tim Lincecum or Cain. Do u think it would be worth pursueing Prince if we could get him for a young, top quality arm? I highly doubt we would go after him due to cost but im just throwing the idea around to see what u guys think You say he's just about to become "expensive" and then mention the Marlins as a possiblity. Helllllllloooooooooooooooo :whistle :whistle :whistle Have you checked lately, but the Marlins don't aquire expensive talent, but get rid of it...... :banghead :banghead :banghead Was this poster real or a troll ? You should probably find another team. Me or Mungo?
September 5, 200817 yr haven't really seen many brewer games is he good defensively? i don't want to jump to conclusions because he is fat so if he is solid like jacobs um i wouldn't mind...but impossible i doubt we will get him
September 5, 200817 yr Author This thread can't be serious. For your information, no it wasnt. I know there isnt a chance in hell that we would ever get Prince Fielder. But that doesnt mean we cant discuss him as a player, or even talk about who you would be willing to trade in order to get him - even tho the team wont. Also, people may be willing to discuss the matter of whether on the Giants part if its worth it to trade away Lincecum or Cain in order to acquire him. I have included the word discuss several times....why? Because this is a forum where matters are discussed, whether they be fantasies or realities.
September 5, 200817 yr Why am I not suprised? Once again, someone throws out a legitimate question and even backs his question up with a caveat about how it might be cost prohibitive. However, it turns into a mud slinging event and people are constantly forced to to defend their answers from individuals who would rather type something to get an outrageous response than actually talk maturely about Marlins Baseball. Honestly, who gives a flying F what someone's name is or if the thread is serious. let me let you in on a little secret people: Nothing would suprise me from this season. The truth be told, being this close to winning the division and possibly coming up short my cause the purse strings to be opened slighty. Dont always believe the media when they say we are dumping salary in the off season. I know my post number isn't that high but I have been around long enough (almost 3.5 years), in my opinion, to say that the quality of posters on this site has gone downhill dramatically in the last 6 months. Some of you seriously need to go back to the mlb.com or espn.com boards because the maturity level of your posts and dialogue back and forth is dragging the overall quality of the board down. I know Admin and the Mods have worked too hard for that to happen.
September 5, 200817 yr I agree with Mr. knglover above. The thread crapping needs to stop. Back on topic -- With our current lineup, another power bat would be superfluous. I'd rather use that "young, top quality arm" to help improve our defense.
September 5, 200817 yr The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw. Hanley only got that contract to make him easier to trade(and he will be...if not this offseason then next offseason), as its relative cheapness included alot of teams that would of been excluded had he not gotten it.
September 5, 200817 yr why would we trade him when we can easily build an affordable team around him?
September 5, 200817 yr The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw. Hanley only got that contract to make him easier to trade(and he will be...if not this offseason then next offseason), as its relative cheapness included alot of teams that would of been excluded had he not gotten it. I respectfully disagree with your statement, Hanley is by far the face of this franchise. I know that someone out there is thinking that that philosophy didnt work with Miggy but honestly did anyone in the Front office ever say that He was the face of the future in S. Fla? The only other big time deal Loria agreed to was the Carlos Delgado deal and I think that it is safe to say that with the way that deal was structured (extremely back loaded) that it was no more than an experiment.
September 5, 200817 yr The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw. Hanley only got that contract to make him easier to trade(and he will be...if not this offseason then next offseason), as its relative cheapness included alot of teams that would of been excluded had he not gotten it. No reason to trade Hanley, especially since he will be so cheap. Plus, as if Hanley need to be made easier to trade.
September 5, 200817 yr The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw. Hanley only got that contract to make him easier to trade(and he will be...if not this offseason then next offseason), as its relative cheapness included alot of teams that would of been excluded had he not gotten it. lol, i remember when someone sai that hanley will be traded before the trade deadline right after he signed his new contract. Well, get used to this. Hanley isnt going anywhere, and when we got our new stadium, many more players will be locked up.
September 5, 200817 yr The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw. Hanley only got that contract to make him easier to trade(and he will be...if not this offseason then next offseason), as its relative cheapness included alot of teams that would of been excluded had he not gotten it. lol, i remember when someone sai that hanley will be traded before the trade deadline right after he signed his new contract. Well, get used to this. Hanley isnt going anywhere, and when we got our new stadium, many more players will be locked up. LOL, I wouldn't be surprised to see Hanley traded in 2010 but for now he is staying. Hanley is what they want to build this team around, but we all know the marlins persona, if somebody gives us an offer of top prospects u should not be surprised to see Beinfest jump on the offer
September 5, 200817 yr Currently the idea of the Brewers swapping Prince Fielder for Matt Cain is just fun speculation. However, it is true the Brewers will listen on Fielder (he is about to get expensive). The Giants are known to like the big first baseman. The hangup is Brian Sabean's reported unwillingness to trade Tim Lincecum or Cain. Do u think it would be worth pursueing Prince if we could get him for a young, top quality arm? I highly doubt we would go after him due to cost but im just throwing the idea around to see what u guys think You say he's just about to become "expensive" and then mention the Marlins as a possiblity. Helllllllloooooooooooooooo :whistle :whistle :whistle Have you checked lately, but the Marlins don't aquire expensive talent, but get rid of it...... :banghead :banghead :banghead Was this poster real or a troll ? The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw. Wouldn't that mean there is a less chance of another player receiving a long-term deal, seeing as though Hanley already got one and this franchise probably doesn't want to spend that much more money?
September 5, 200817 yr The first few lines were copied word for word from another website. Well maybe since we signed Hanley to an "expensive" contract, others may also be signed. I am not implying Fielder in this comment btw. Hanley only got that contract to make him easier to trade(and he will be...if not this offseason then next offseason), as its relative cheapness included alot of teams that would of been excluded had he not gotten it. lol, i remember when someone sai that hanley will be traded before the trade deadline right after he signed his new contract. Well, get used to this. Hanley isnt going anywhere, and when we got our new stadium, many more players will be locked up. LOL, I wouldn't be surprised to see Hanley traded in 2010 but for now he is staying. Hanley is what they want to build this team around, but we all know the marlins persona, if somebody gives us an offer of top prospects u should not be surprised to see Beinfest jump on the offer yea if hanley traded no surprise...because that is how this franchise has been since it's existance....we are a farm we grow players and once they reach super star status they are gone....remember the lowell signing? i mean i am glad we got hanley but wasn't loweel signed for a long time?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.