June 6, 20188 yr Maybe he's signing under slot, but not drastically? That's all I'm saying. The fact that they signed him so quickly indicates that they probably had a clear idea that he would sign under slot when they drafted him--as if they had some kind of understanding on terms with him already (and yes, the fact that he's from the Tampa area probably put him on Denbo's radar). He was probably on the Marlins short list and other names could have been grabbed already, but this still implies to me that the Marlins didn't draft Gorman or Singer because of money reasons. I'm not bent out of shape about this, because there is so much uncertainty with the draft that guys like Gorman or Singer might not even pan out, but this pick screams of being one made because of signability/below slot. I'm guessing they'll need to save $ on the Scott and/or Johnson picks in order to go above slot for the highly-ranked Vandy commit they got in the 3rd.
June 6, 20188 yr Maybe he's signing under slot, but not drastically? That's all I'm saying. The fact that they signed him so quickly indicates that they probably had a clear idea that he would sign under slot when they drafted him--as if they had some kind of understanding on terms with him already (and yes, the fact that he's from the Tampa area probably put him on Denbo's radar). He was probably on the Marlins short list and other names could have been grabbed already, but this still implies to me that the Marlins didn't draft Gorman or Singer because of money reasons. I'm not bent out of shape about this, because there is so much uncertainty with the draft that guys like Gorman or Singer might not even pan out, but this pick screams of being one made because of signability/below slot. I agree the decision to draft a guy like Singer vs. Scott is definitely financially motivated. But the issue isn't whether or not the Marlins are willing to spend $ on the draft. It's do you want to spend like 60% + of your bonus pool on just Brady Singer, or would you rather put that towards Scott + one or two others.
June 6, 20188 yr do you want to spend like 60% + of your bonus pool on just Brady Singer, or would you rather put that towards Scott + one or two others. This. That is what amazes me. The ones calling it financially based are acting like it is the Marlins being cheap. That isn't it. They have limited resources they are allowed to use and multiple needs.
June 6, 20188 yr Thank you Mr. Jeter for that clarification. So because I present facts, it must mean I'm Jeter?
June 6, 20188 yr I know I'll probably be asked if I'm having a bad week but can anyone dispute what I said in the post above? You all know teams have a limited pool for drafts right? I know there is a need for a snarky reply but if you honestly disagree with my assessment please share why.
June 6, 20188 yr Author Damn @SonOfJack it's only Wednesday morning and you're already having a bad week? But yes you're right. Each team has a certain amount of money to spend and it's not just the Marlins who need to determine how to distribute that money amongst all their draft picks. No team has an unlimited amount of pool money. This debate has become like someone complaining that a mother of 5 didn't allow her smartest kid to order the lobster meal when the family went out for dinner.
June 6, 20188 yr So many picks are signing quick, Liberatore is even close to a deal. Damn, must be a sign of huge underpays according to this website.
June 7, 20188 yr Author There's no way Liberatore is anywhere close to signing. Guaranteed future aces don't give in that easily.
June 7, 20188 yr Didnt even read the thread because the draft is a complete crapshoot, but anyone being overly positive or negative about the draft for whatever reason is just stupid. It will legitimately be 3 years from now and we still won't know how well this draft went.
June 7, 20188 yr Didnt even read the thread because the draft is a complete crapshoot, but anyone being overly positive or negative about the draft for whatever reason is just stupid. It will legitimately be 3 years from now and we still won't know how well this draft went. Bingo.
June 7, 20188 yr Damn @SonOfJack it's only Wednesday morning and you're already having a bad week? But yes you're right. Each team has a certain amount of money to spend and it's not just the Marlins who need to determine how to distribute that money amongst all their draft picks. No team has an unlimited amount of pool money. This debate has become like someone complaining that a mother of 5 didn't allow her smartest kid to order the lobster meal when the family went out for dinner. The only positive argument from your post it's that you've been to Red Lobster recently
June 7, 20188 yr Author Yes it's too early to judge the entire draft but curious if anyone felt any differences with this draft and their strategies and who they went after in comparison to the past Loria led drafts?
June 7, 20188 yr Yes it's too early to judge the entire draft but curious if anyone felt any differences with this draft and their strategies and who they went after in comparison to the past Loria led drafts? not the strategy but the speed with which they signed scott was refreshing. We would always foolishly haggle for like 2 months with first round picks and sign them at the last second and never play them in the year they get drafted.
June 7, 20188 yr not the strategy but the speed with which they signed scott was refreshing. We would always foolishly haggle for like 2 months with first round picks and sign them at the last second and never play them in the year they get drafter. Weird since I keep reading here they based their picks completely on how cheap it'd be.
June 7, 20188 yr Yes it's too early to judge the entire draft but curious if anyone felt any differences with this draft and their strategies and who they went after in comparison to the past Loria led drafts? THEY ONLY WENT AFTER THE CHEEPEST GUYS AND DIDN'T EVEN TRIE TO GET GOOD PLYERS THEY PURPUSELY DRAFTED GUYS WHO WIL NEVAR MAKE IT TO THE MAJOR LEEGS SO THAT THEY OLNY HAVE TO EVER PAYE THEM MINOR LEAGUE CELERY INSTEAD OF THE MAJOR LEEG MINUMIM CELERY
June 7, 20188 yr Author THEY ONLY WENT AFTER THE CHEEPEST GUYS AND DIDN'T EVEN TRIE TO GET GOOD PLYERS THEY PURPUSELY DRAFTED GUYS WHO WIL NEVAR MAKE IT TO THE MAJOR LEEGS SO THAT THEY OLNY HAVE TO EVER PAYE THEM MINOR LEAGUE CELERY INSTEAD OF THE MAJOR LEEG MINUMIM CELERY [ATTACH]2022._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH]2021._xfImport[/ATTACH]
June 7, 20188 yr I want to know what MacGyver could make out of those two items. the best fuckin' sex toy you've ever seen, binch
June 9, 20188 yr He signed for full pick value. Wonder if the people assuming otherwise will admit they were wrong or not.
June 9, 20188 yr The Marlins took Scott instead of Liberatore strictly for financial reasons... Oh wait, what's that Scott got more money?
June 9, 20188 yr Author Omg this is amazing. An absolute complete 200% proving wrong of those saying we chose Scott over Liberatore for financial reasons. I'm really not one to be a dick about this stuff but @The_Punisher will you please respond to this?
June 9, 20188 yr Yep but don't expect this user or any of them to come back and admit they assumed wrong. Not saying I called this [uSER=2328]@SilverBullet1929[/uSER] but yeah.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.