djm305 Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/stor...yson&id=1788646 By Jayson Stark ESPN.com We are gazing into our ESPN.com crystal ball. We are stunned to find a sight we never thought we'd ever see: It's a team playing major-league baseball games illuminated by the bright lights of Las Vegas. But here's the real stunner inside that crystal ball: That team we're seeing in there is not the Expos. Instead, that team is a club you may have last laid eyes on while it was setting an all-time October record for most champagne sprayed in one clubhouse. In other words, that team would be the franchise now known as the Florida Marlins. Granted, our crystal ball has been known to get snowy once in a while, so this vision comes with no guarantees. But it's also a vision that could go from the crystal ball to the drawing board faster than you can say "Juan Pierre." Here's why: We now stand just days away from the Marlins' May 1 deadline for completing plans to finance a new $325 million ballpark in South Florida. We hear that Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria has been telling people he never has been more optimistic about the chances of having that actually happen. We hope he's right. But what if he's not? What if the Florida legislature continues to balk at approving what appears to be the $60 million last piece in the ballpark puzzle -- a $2 million-a-year sales-tax rebate that would expire after 30 years? The Marlins never quite say what's next. But you sure don't need to click on Mapquest to connect these dots. What's next, logically speaking, would be a potential race to beat the Expos into Vegas or Washington, D.C. Oh, the Marlins never threaten to enter that race. But they won't pretend they're not aware of the concept, either. "Relocation in baseball was always a fantasy -- but now, because of the Expos' situation, it's a reality," says Marlins president David Samson. "It's not something in the abstract. It's real. ... "I know that when politicians hear that, they assume you're crying wolf," Samson goes on. "Well, they can continue to assume that. But if they do, eventually somebody is going to get burned." And by "somebody," it's safe to guess he isn't talking about the residents of Butte, Montana. We should make it clear we are convinced the Marlins don't want to move. Their season-ticket sales have rocketed from an absurd 250 in 2002 to about 9,200 in 2004. And there is more energy around the franchise now, given their parade last fall and their fabulous start this spring, than there has been in a decade. So they are finally in position to prove to all the doubters that baseball can succeed in the state of Florida. They also have more pieces in place to make their new ballpark happen than they have ever had: They have a site in Miami, near the soon-to-be-renovated Orange Bowl, for a 38,000-seat, retractable-dome stadium. They appear to be closing in on completing agreements for all of the funding except the $60-million tax rebate from the state. And the hope is that if the plan they present in Tallahassee is that close to finalization, they can convince the legislature to fill in the only crack. But in the new-stadium game, as in baseball itself, "close" just means you're still a big hit away. And detached observers remain skeptical that that big hit will come as easy to the Marlins off the field as they have made it look lately on the field. The clock continues to tick. The legislature will adjourn for the summer in about a week. And the Marlins are holding firm on either making this happen by early May or ... well, or what? They never exactly say. But Samson insists the team can't wait any longer because "we just don't have that kind of time. ... We've got to open [the new park]by 2007." For every year they delay, he says, construction costs go up by between $10 million and $20 million -- which is $10 million to $20 million they don't have. That's the economic reality. But then there's the baseball reality. Brad Penny can be a free agent before the 2005 season. A.J. Burnett can be a free agent before the 2006 season. Josh Beckett can be a free agent after the 2007 season. Mike Lowell can opt out of his current contract after this year if there's no ballpark. So the only realistic hope to retain the foundation of a potentially dominant franchise rides on the fate of that ballpark. Or ... Or on a move to a ballpark somewhere else in this great land. Not that moving is either attractive or easy. To move, the Marlins would have to have the permission of both the commissioner and the other owners. And no one knows if Bud Selig would give that permission -- because the commish isn't saying. Selig does say, "It's clear that team can't stay in its present facility. It's just not an economically viable baseball stadium. They need a new stadium, no question about that." But what if they don't get that new stadium? "I'm just hopeful I'm not confronted with that issue," Selig says, diplomatically. And if he is? We've surveyed a number of baseball people on this question. And there is reason to believe Selig wouldn't stand in the way of this team moving -- not if the alternative meant pumping millions of additional revenue-sharing bucks into a franchise holding the worst lease deal in the National League, with no hope of escaping. It's reasonable to assume Selig would give the Expos first choice of destinations. But it's also reasonable to assume Loria would be happy to move to either D.C. or Vegas. One source, who is locked in on the relocation soap opera, says Loria has "always had his eyes on Washington." Which is, obviously, an easier commute from his New York home than Miami is. But another source tells us the buzz inside the Marlins' little universe is that Loria views Vegas as "a gold mine." Both destinations come with all kinds of complications, though. And by now, you probably know those complications by heart. It's becoming increasingly clear that the biggest obstacle to a move to Washington is Orioles owner Peter Angelos, who is now a member of baseball's powerful executive council. Angelos shows no signs of backing off his never-ending fight to keep another team from plopping down on what he views as his turf. And Vegas has all those pesky gambling issues. But beyond that, while it may be the fastest-growing metropolis in America, it's still just the No. 53 TV market (compared to No. 16 in South Florida). And it would have a population base (approximately 1.5 million) about the same size as Milwaukee, the smallest market in the big leagues -- although Vegas, we'd dare say, has more tourists. Then there are even peskier practical issues. The only ballpark in Las Vegas, Cashman Field, is an unacceptable minor-league facility with 9,500 seats. There has been talk of building a 40,000-seat ballpark right off the fabled Strip to accommodate the Expos. But the soonest you could envision that park opening is 2007. So where, exactly, would a big-league team play in the meantime -- the lobby of Caesar's Palace? It's tricky, all right. And maybe it will all turn out to be moot, if the Marlins' Orange Bowl stadium dreams come true. But if not, we could be little more than a week away from seeing this story explode into a major extravaganza. "I still believe we're going to be fine, and this will all work out [in South Florida]," Samson says. "But politics is a rough business. ... "This is it. It has to happen in the next week. And if not," says the Marlins president, "we'll move on." But to where? That would be the next chapter in a saga this team hopes it never has to write. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild Card Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 No way in hell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamrock Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 I think Stark is a terrible writer, but hes right. Something major will probably happen in the next week. But how long have we been hearing that now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teal Shadow Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 I said it once and I'll say it again both the state and Marlins are playing a dangerous game of chicken. The state has to ask themself is Wayne money more important, than the Marlins playing in your state. :plain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DurableTear Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 I said it once and I'll say it again both the state and Marlins are playing a dangerous game of chicken. The state has to ask themself is Wayne money more important, than the Marlins playing in your state. :plain Money speaks Ed... They'll go with Wayne... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lIdDo MiGgY lOvEr Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 bulls**t!that is never going to happen!what are they thinking? :banghead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DurableTear Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 bulls**t!that is never going to happen!what are they thinking? :banghead Never say never... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBMarlin Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 This is just a bunch of BS speculation by Stark. Let's see what happens next week before we get too excited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mabdul Doobakus Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 I don't just think this is something that could happen. I think it WILL happen if they don't get a stadium done soon. Maybe not by May 1st, but real soon. Because the Marlins just don't have a choice. They have ZERO other options. There is nothing else--NOTHING-- that they can do to keep this franchise afloat, so it's either fold or move. And I don't think the state cares, honestly. What's it to them whether the Marlins stick around? The state's voters are like 80% against a new stadium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libelula Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 I would hate not having a baseball team down here. How boring is summer gonna be? Damn it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teal Shadow Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 I don't just think this is something that could happen. I think it WILL happen if they don't get a stadium done soon. Maybe not by May 1st, but real soon. Because the Marlins just don't have a choice. They have ZERO other options. There is nothing else--NOTHING-- that they can do to keep this franchise afloat, so it's either fold or move. And I don't think the state cares, honestly. What's it to them whether the Marlins stick around? The state's voters are like 80% against a new stadium. They do have options...believe me they do :plain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuickGold Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 Stark is talking out of the wrong orrifice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlins24 Posted April 24, 2004 Share Posted April 24, 2004 They dont even have the right deadline (May 6th not May 1st) They dont have all the latest facts and by the way isnt ESPN anti-Marlins? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flamarlins3 Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 They dont even have the right deadline (May 6th not May 1st) They dont have all the latest facts and by the way isnt ESPN anti-Marlins? Yeah deadline is now May 6. Its an article to get people thinking I guess, I dunno. I mean this is kind of a reality that we might have to face unfortunately so don't be surprised if you see more articles like this especially if the deadline passes without a stadium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshFish Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 I don't like the article, but it may not be to far from reality. However, I think there is a little something here. Wayne vs Loria. Emotion is stronger than logic. Wayne's money is one the middle, and I think Loria may build a roofless stadium without the 60million to get out of PPS and prove everyone wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofthefish Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 I kind of like the sound of that. Las Vegas Marlins, huh? Well the Marlins will have to go, not much saltwater in the desert is there. I wish them well wherever they may go. Thank our elected officials who may forget that this is an election year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babaru Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 :mad : :mad : :mad : ... :thumbdown :thumbdown :thumbdown please dont mask curses, thanks...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlins2003 Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 All through last season Jayson Stark was the one voice chmpioning the Marlins. And it continues to this day. You can't paint Stark with the same brush as most of the rest of ESPN. It's unfair and inaccurate. He wouldn't write a piece like this unless he had cause to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mabdul Doobakus Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 I don't just think this is something that could happen. I think it WILL happen if they don't get a stadium done soon. Maybe not by May 1st, but real soon. Because the Marlins just don't have a choice. They have ZERO other options. There is nothing else--NOTHING-- that they can do to keep this franchise afloat, so it's either fold or move. And I don't think the state cares, honestly. What's it to them whether the Marlins stick around? The state's voters are like 80% against a new stadium. They do have options...believe me they do :plain Like snatching old ladies' purses? Putting the heads of horses in the lawmakers beds? Robbing banks? Seriously, can you say anything further? I really don't see what else there is to be done. They either get the money or they don't. They could also assassinate Wayne, but that would be immoral. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teal Shadow Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 Marlins2003 is right Starks is one of the most well respected writers in the game. I've been telling you guys for weeks that the team has options, but for some reason those have chosen to listen to those non baseball people on the radio. Who have there own agenda towards the team. I hope the game of chicken ends because only the fans will be hurt. :confused Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NirvanaNole Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 Well, if the Marlins do have to leave and can't get a deal in another FL city, I hope they do go to Vegas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuickGold Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 They mentioned this(not the article, just the prospect of moving) on TBS today during the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlins2003 Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 I wish some of you could understand this dance that you see on the surface (regarding the Fish, the stadium and the back story) is in reality as complex as any situation you'll ever see. There are so many layers of power brokers and would-be power brokers vying to influence the outcome that you truly can't tell the players without a program. There's political agendas, local, state and federal elections coming into play, old quarrels being settled, the PPS guys working furiously to drive them away, cities lining up to make their interest known, the media's obession on continuing their relationships with all things football. There's land speculators, there's concession interests, unions, pro-tourism guys maniacally trying to undermine a deal, there's transportation interests, urban planners, neighborhood associations. There's contractors and development interests. The big boys. There's individual ma and pa property owners who see this as an opportunity to become millionaires. Then there's the lobbyists. And that's just in Miami-Dade. Go to Tallahassee and you have even more layers of power-brokering and deal making. I'll be broken-hearted but I will understand if Loria finally throws his hands up and says he's had enough. He's delivered a world championship, his team has the best record in baseball, he's there for every pitch of every game, a week ago he put on a fireworks show that no one who attended will ever forget. In short, he's done everything he said he would to bring back major league baseball in South Florida all the while enduring the revulsion the media heaped on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rferry Posted April 25, 2004 Share Posted April 25, 2004 His core point rings true. Relocation of the Expos opens up options for the Marlins. But Las Vegas? No way. MLB has another thrity years to use that market has an empty threat to states with teams playing in old parks. The Marlins? He hasn't done his home work. The Marlins looks to be working out some sort of deal well before the relocation of the Expos every comes around (this July, or this October or winter or next July.... or whenever MLB feels like it). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djm305 Posted April 25, 2004 Author Share Posted April 25, 2004 personally im tired of reading things about a stadium, i don't care anymore, when something official either way is released then I will commit some braincells to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.