Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

MarlinsBaseball.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Ricky Nolasco traded to Dodgers

Featured Replies

I'll be pretty pissed if his salary was the difference between "good" prospects from col and this haul from LA

 

 

It obviously was, but I doubt Colorado's offer was filled with top 10 prospect players in return. We took the meh offer from the team that would take Nolasco's contract. Not exactly a shocking revelation.

 

 

I'd still love to see with the Rockies offered..

Cishek has two pitches with an average of ~92 mph on his fastball.

 

What's terrible is that you've already reached a conclusion on a guy you've never even seen pitch. Saying a 25-year old reliever who's put up good K #'s in the minors definitely doesn't have the stuff to pitch in the big leagues seems absurd. Most people in the game who have actually watched him pitch seem to think he could pitch in a big league bullpen this year as a 7th/8th inning guy.

 

 

 

That's not what Pitch FX data says about Cishek--93.73 MPH fastball and 93.45 MPH sinker this season. I have no idea where you get 92 MPH from. His career average on his fastball is 93.67.

 

All I said was that his stuff doesn't appear to be impressive. Pitch FX data goes a long way toward informing that opinion.

So this is a bad deal for the team? Just a salary dump and 3 lower level Minor guys?

 

Blah. Oh well.

 

 

It's not a bad deal because Ricky Nolasco sucks. As of right now, it seems like an irrelevant deal. Maybe we got a quality bullpen arm or two out of it, maybe not.

So this is a bad deal for the team? Just a salary dump and 3 lower level Minor guys?

 

Blah. Oh well.

 

 

It's not a bad deal because Ricky Nolasco sucks. As of right now, it seems like an irrelevant deal. Maybe we got a quality bullpen arm or two out of it, maybe not.

 

 

So it's 1 SP from AAA, a RP from AAA, and a RP from A+??

Cishek has two pitches with an average of ~92 mph on his fastball.

 

What's terrible is that you've already reached a conclusion on a guy you've never even seen pitch. Saying a 25-year old reliever who's put up good K #'s in the minors definitely doesn't have the stuff to pitch in the big leagues seems absurd. Most people in the game who have actually watched him pitch seem to think he could pitch in a big league bullpen this year as a 7th/8th inning guy.

 

 

 

That's not what Pitch FX data says about Cishek--93.73 MPH fastball and 93.45 MPH sinker this season. I have no idea where you get 92 MPH from. His career average on his fastball is 93.67.

 

All I said was that his stuff doesn't appear to be impressive. Pitch FX data goes a long way toward informing that opinion.

 

 

Fangraphs doesn't have the same #'s for Cishek.

 

Either way, your statement was rather bold and ridiculous. There are plenty of big league relievers who have had success without overpowering stuff.

Cishek has two pitches with an average of ~92 mph on his fastball.

 

What's terrible is that you've already reached a conclusion on a guy you've never even seen pitch. Saying a 25-year old reliever who's put up good K #'s in the minors definitely doesn't have the stuff to pitch in the big leagues seems absurd. Most people in the game who have actually watched him pitch seem to think he could pitch in a big league bullpen this year as a 7th/8th inning guy.

 

 

 

That's not what Pitch FX data says about Cishek--93.73 MPH fastball and 93.45 MPH sinker this season. I have no idea where you get 92 MPH from. His career average on his fastball is 93.67.

 

All I said was that his stuff doesn't appear to be impressive. Pitch FX data goes a long way toward informing that opinion.

 

 

Fangraphs doesn't have the same #'s for Cishek.

 

Either way, your statement was rather bold and ridiculous. There are plenty of big league relievers who have had success without overpowering stuff.

 

 

 

 

I was looking at Brooks baseball, which I tend to regard as being more reliable because it's more exclusively a pitch FX site. And I still don't understand the comparison. Cishek doesn't rely on a fastball as a dominant pitch. Ames does (he throws it more than 60% of the time). I can't think of too many solid major league relievers who throw a 90 MPH fastball >60% of the time as their dominant pitch and have had much success. If he had a tendency to mix in quality secondary pitches with greater frequency, I'd be more optimistic, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

 

There are guys like Luke Gregerson and Huston Street who don't throw hard and have had a lot of success in relief, but they aren't primarily relying on a fastball. Sinkerballers are different kinds of pitchers.

Is this trade official? MLBTR hasn't written anything. The Angel Sanchez bit seems to be speculation, from what I gather.

Is this trade official? MLBTR hasn't written anything. The Angel Sanchez bit seems to be speculation, from what I gather.

 

its done. Sanchez is the "center piece" of the deal for the marlins

so, i suggest we find a way to get beinfest fired. he is possibly the worst GM in the game. give the job to a professor of economics From UF.

I'll be pretty pissed if his salary was the difference between "good" prospects from col and this haul from LA

 

 

It obviously was, but I doubt Colorado's offer was filled with top 10 prospect players in return. We took the meh offer from the team that would take Nolasco's contract. Not exactly a shocking revelation.

 

 

 

I'd still love to see with the Rockies offered..

 

 

 

 

If that cheap c*ck suckin piece of sh*t Loria sacrificed talent for $ again, I think my head is going to blow. Why can't that fat piece of f*ckin horse sh*t get hit by a car already.

 

 

I would love to see a fat piece of f***in horse s*** suck a cock. Actually, I know just the website.

 

 

 

SI is reporting that Rockies package was better. How the fuck does Selig let this shit continue. That fat piece of garbage claims it has nothing to do with money, but every time he trades someone, he makes sure to get the other team to pick up the salary. The Dodgers could have have given the Marlins the beer vendor and the janitor for Nolasco if they were willing to throw in another couple million more. He is such a slimey piece of shit

The Rockies package might have been better, but we can't say for sure that the prospects would have actually been worth paying the $5+ million left on Nolasco's salary. It's not like any names were ever thrown around.

 

 

Eh. No excuse IMO if this is true about Rockies prospects being better. This move was a salary dump and maybe we get a decent middle RP out of it.

 

Excited for ... to defend this one.

The Rockies package might have been better, but we can't say for sure that the prospects would have actually been worth paying the $5+ million left on Nolasco's salary. It's not like any names were ever thrown around.

 

 

Eh. No excuse IMO if this is true about Rockies prospects being better.

 

 

Based on the pretty dismal return the Marlins got from the Dodgers, don't you think that the return from the Rockies would have needed to be considerably better to justify spending $5-6 million for the players?

 

If you are going to spend that much money on prospects, the talent needs to be pretty damn good.

The Rockies package might have been better, but we can't say for sure that the prospects would have actually been worth paying the $5+ million left on Nolasco's salary. It's not like any names were ever thrown around.

 

 

Eh. No excuse IMO if this is true about Rockies prospects being better.

 

 

Based on the pretty dismal return the Marlins got from the Dodgers, don't you think that the return from the Rockies would have needed to be considerably better to justify spending $5-6 million for the players?

 

If you are going to spend that much money on prospects, the talent needs to be pretty damn good.

 

 

 

I'd agree with what your saying except for 2 things, our payroll is 36MM, it's not like we couldn't throw some extra money around for better prospects. Secondly, fat piece of shit does this with every single trade from Hanley to the Blue Jays dumping. He is a cheap disgusting piece of shit that doesn't care about this team at all

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.