SilverBullet 1,095 Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 Why just 7 innings??? Teams have already played 9 inning games this season so there goes competitive integrity. Should have done 7 from day one if that's what they wanted. And what's 2 more innings and that point anyways. Awful. I can take lesser games but changing the games themselves should have been a strong no from day one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rmc523 235 Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 I don't really see what the point of this is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SonOfJack 1,074 Posted July 31 Author Share Posted July 31 I dislike this as well. Seems unnecessary. If they are concerned about too many innings for players, keep the roster size at 30. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 1,095 Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 Jesus this also means a runner to start the EIGHTH AND NINTH INNINGS. Manfred is the absolute worst and he keeps seemingly getting even worse with every decision under his watch. Every fan hates this, no good will come of this. Despite ruining the actual games they don't even care about the harm this does to the fanbase that they desperately need to try and keep happy. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 1,095 Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 Ken Rosenthal says the idea is to preserve pitching... then add 2 pitchers to the roster on each double header day, like Jack suggested above. Why couldn't these idiots think of that? I'm sure the union would have loved that idea too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rmc523 235 Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 11 minutes ago, SilverBullet said: Ken Rosenthal says the idea is to preserve pitching... then add 2 pitchers to the roster on each double header day, like Jack suggested above. Why couldn't these idiots think of that? I'm sure the union would have loved that idea too. Not only that - if that was the intent, why not have it that way from the start of the season a week ago? Like why now? All the sudden they realized they want to preserve pitching? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 1,095 Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 2 minutes ago, rmc523 said: Not only that - if that was the intent, why not have it that way from the start of the season a week ago? Like why now? All the sudden they realized they want to preserve pitching? Well I think this is in direct response to the postponed games which they didnt think they'd have so many of them coming. I think that explains that. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hovertical 74 Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 17 hours ago, SilverBullet said: Jesus this also means a runner to start the EIGHTH AND NINTH INNINGS. Manfred is the absolute worst and he keeps seemingly getting even worse with every decision under his watch. Every fan hates this, no good will come of this. Despite ruining the actual games they don't even care about the harm this does to the fanbase that they desperately need to try and keep happy. "We're trying to speed up games to that doubleheaders will be under 3 hours total" 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Das Texan 88 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 I really dont care one way or another. Especially if its for 2020 only. Get as out of the box and creative as you want. End of day, fans wont care when you revert back to how baseball is come 2021. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SilverBullet 1,095 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 4 hours ago, Das Texan said: Get as out of the box and creative as you want. No. Not when games in the same season are being played under different rules. If they were gonna do 7 inning games all year then that's different but not like this. If I'm the manager of a team that blows a lead in the bottom of the 7th and loses on a walk off I'm furious that I don't get the 2 extra innings to come back when I would get those innings if the game was not on a double header day. That's bullshit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cyoung 35 Posted August 3 Share Posted August 3 8 hours ago, SilverBullet said: No. Not when games in the same season are being played under different rules. If they were gonna do 7 inning games all year then that's different but not like this. If I'm the manager of a team that blows a lead in the bottom of the 7th and loses on a walk off I'm furious that I don't get the 2 extra innings to come back when I would get those innings if the game was not on a double header day. That's bullshit. Now when we win the WS, they're gonna put a * next to it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Michael 847 Posted August 3 Share Posted August 3 3 minutes ago, cyoung said: Now when we win the WS, they're gonna put a * next to it. That was going to happen regardless. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FishFan95 346 Posted August 3 Share Posted August 3 Players should be payed for 7/9 of a game for double headers then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FishFan95 346 Posted August 3 Share Posted August 3 Rob manfred's plan: Let's play MiLB and charge MLB prices! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Das Texan 88 Posted August 4 Share Posted August 4 On 8/2/2020 at 1:03 PM, SilverBullet said: No. Not when games in the same season are being played under different rules. If they were gonna do 7 inning games all year then that's different but not like this. If I'm the manager of a team that blows a lead in the bottom of the 7th and loses on a walk off I'm furious that I don't get the 2 extra innings to come back when I would get those innings if the game was not on a double header day. That's bullshit. Honestly, I dont think anybody really cares in 2020 end of day. This is just an opportunity to really just get after it fully here and do some real radical things that are outside the box. In 2020, this is one of the things I least hate Manfred for honestly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.