Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

JoeFrisaro Joe Frisaro

 

 

 

 

#Marlins tender contracts to Anibal Sanchez, Emilio Bonifacio, Chris Volstad, Edward Mujica and JC Oviedo

Well they said they would and did. JC Oviedo.....

Expected all of those but if the organization thinks adding buerhle and keeping guys like volstad solves the rotation problems then we are in trouble.

Volstad? barf

Well they said they would and did. JC Oviedo.....

 

I'm kind of expecting this to blow up in their faces when no one wants to take him in a trade for that salary...

Volstad? barf

 

Nolasco last year ERA 4.67 to get 9MM this year? barf

speaking of tendered contracts....ronny paulino was non-tendered. would love to have him back on the team.

speaking of tendered contracts....ronny paulino was non-tendered. would love to have him back on the team.

 

 

:lol LMAO! Sorry, though that was funny

Expected all of those but if the organization thinks adding buerhle and keeping guys like volstad solves the rotation problems then we are in trouble.

 

 

Yeah because our rotation is the worst.

At least we're not the Mets.

 

The Mets rotation is Johan Santana, Jon Niese, R.A. Dickey, Mike Pelfrey and Dillon Gee and a report surfaced today that Santana is not expected to be right for Opening Day.

Volstad? barf

 

Nolasco last year ERA 4.67 to get 9MM this year? barf

I'm just going to start replying to blind Nolasco hate posts with one simple number: .331. That led all of baseball. Second was Edwin Jackson.

Volstad? barf

 

Nolasco last year ERA 4.67 to get 9MM this year? barf

I'm just going to start replying to blind Nolasco hate posts with one simple number: .331. That led all of baseball. Second was Edwin Jackson.

 

Hes still inconsistent.

Volstad? barf

 

Nolasco last year ERA 4.67 to get 9MM this year? barf

I'm just going to start replying to blind Nolasco hate posts with one simple number: .331. That led all of baseball. Second was Edwin Jackson.

 

Hes still inconsistent.

He's fine for a #4.

Not really sure what they're doing with Nunez/Oviedo contract. 6 million for a mediocre setup guy with legal issues? Trying to trade him at some point? Will he have any value with all the issues? Perplexing move to say the least.

Not really sure what they're doing with Nunez/Oviedo contract. 6 million for a mediocre setup guy with legal issues? Trying to trade him at some point? Will he have any value with all the issues? Perplexing move to say the least.

 

 

According to JCR, it's for a trade; I think they're going to keep him, though.

Not really sure what they're doing with Nunez/Oviedo contract. 6 million for a mediocre setup guy with legal issues? Trying to trade him at some point? Will he have any value with all the issues? Perplexing move to say the least.

 

 

According to JCR, it's for a trade;

For Mike Jacobs?

Not really sure what they're doing with Nunez/Oviedo contract. 6 million for a mediocre setup guy with legal issues? Trying to trade him at some point? Will he have any value with all the issues? Perplexing move to say the least.

 

 

Not a bad set up guy. But the price is steep for that. "All the issues" should be settled unless the USA and/or MLB have something to say. There are still alot of closers on the loose, so not so sure he would be in demand in a trade. Gotta wonder where they are going with this one. Maybe they have something in the works that we don't know about??

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...