Jump to content

7/7 Post Game


Mr. Man
 Share

Recommended Posts


That is about as annoying as it gets.

 

I just wish solano would have taken ball 4 then we could pinch hit buck for power.

 

Really want to take this damn series going into the break.

 

And I never want to f***ing see Kyle lohse again.

 

And of course we lose 1 game and the nationals and mets take a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hanley's swing seems to change from game to game, he seems completely lost.

 

His intelligence is what I am curious about. He's been in the game long enough to know to make changes but he doesn't. He's not going to be around much longer if he keeps this up for any more number of years.

 

What really got me scratching my head was Tommy's comment a few games ago now( don't remember which one) about Hanley using other players bat's. If that doesn't tell you he is lost at the plate I don't know what will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Solano would've reached base, I wonder if Ozzie would've been dumb enough to let Hayes hit instead of Infante. Honestly, it's stupid to not have Infante pinch-hit there in the 9th inning for Solano. What was he waiting for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hanley's swing seems to change from game to game, he seems completely lost.

 

His intelligence is what I am curious about. He's been in the game long enough to know to make changes but he doesn't. He's not going to be around much longer if he keeps this up for any more number of years.

 

That's why the Marlins should try to move him ASAP. This guy is not going to get better - he is what he is and has been for 3 years - OVERRATED !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what would we get for Hanley honestly? Trading him doesn't make us better. If he sucks, we're not going to get good value in a trade.

 

And this is not a defense of his play. He's stunk compared to his prime years. I just don't think we're going to get 2-3 magical players that make us better. And Solano is not the answer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what would we get for Hanley honestly? Trading him doesn't make us better. If he sucks, we're not going to get good value in a trade.

 

And this is not a defense of his play. He's stunk compared to his prime years. I just don't think we're going to get 2-3 magical players that make us better. And Solano is not the answer...

 

 

I think the less is more comes into play with Hanley. It would 1st allow the FO to move on, and not keep waiting to make some moves because they sit back and wait to see Hanley start doing something. Sometimes you have to just "move on" and say, he just didn't work out for us.

 

And if we don't get value for him, so what we didn't get value for Cabrera did we ? OOPS.....shouldn't bring that up again :jacobs

 

:lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what would we get for Hanley honestly? Trading him doesn't make us better. If he sucks, we're not going to get good value in a trade.

 

And this is not a defense of his play. He's stunk compared to his prime years. I just don't think we're going to get 2-3 magical players that make us better. And Solano is not the answer...

 

 

Actually you can get good value for Hanley, because a lot of teams are going to look at him as under performing and worth the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

If Solano would've reached base, I wonder if Ozzie would've been dumb enough to let Hayes hit instead of Infante. Honestly, it's stupid to not have Infante pinch-hit there in the 9th inning for Solano. What was he waiting for?

 

According to Ozzie, Solano is a baseball player. Interpret that as you wish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what would we get for Hanley honestly? Trading him doesn't make us better. If he sucks, we're not going to get good value in a trade.

 

And this is not a defense of his play. He's stunk compared to his prime years. I just don't think we're going to get 2-3 magical players that make us better. And Solano is not the answer...

 

 

Actually you can get good value for Hanley, because a lot of teams are going to look at him as under performing and worth the risk.

 

Maybe a year ago, but the days of Hanley great worth are over with. Well maybe you could get a stupid FO to pay a lot for him, but its been 3 years of underperformance. That seems more like trend than abberation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what would we get for Hanley honestly? Trading him doesn't make us better. If he sucks, we're not going to get good value in a trade.

 

And this is not a defense of his play. He's stunk compared to his prime years. I just don't think we're going to get 2-3 magical players that make us better. And Solano is not the answer...

 

 

Actually you can get good value for Hanley, because a lot of teams are going to look at him as under performing and worth the risk.

 

Maybe a year ago, but the days of Hanley great worth are over with. Well maybe you could get a stupid FO to pay a lot for him, but its been 3 years of underperformance. That seems more like trend than abberation.

 

More like two years. The guy missed a lot of time last year as well.

 

You know Boston has some sort of love affair with the guy and would probably love to trade for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what would we get for Hanley honestly? Trading him doesn't make us better. If he sucks, we're not going to get good value in a trade.

 

And this is not a defense of his play. He's stunk compared to his prime years. I just don't think we're going to get 2-3 magical players that make us better. And Solano is not the answer...

 

 

Actually you can get good value for Hanley, because a lot of teams are going to look at him as under performing and worth the risk.

 

Maybe a year ago, but the days of Hanley great worth are over with. Well maybe you could get a stupid FO to pay a lot for him, but its been 3 years of underperformance. That seems more like trend than abberation.

 

More like two years. The guy missed a lot of time last year as well.

 

You know Boston has some sort of love affair with the guy and would probably love to trade for him.

 

Good give us Middlebrooks for Hanley :lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...