2 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

So Atlanta will turn on the "run machine" where they know what's coming and immediately come back and take the lead?

If it happens again, I'm going to blast my theory all over Twitter.

Glad Berti got the hit there, but I'd like to see him (or Sierra) in the lead-off spot more often and move everyone else down one in the order (and replace Joyce!)

Open the floodgates

Just now, CyggyMarlin said:

Glad Berti got the hit there, but I'd like to see him (or Sierra) in the lead-off spot more often and move everyone else down one in the order (and replace Joyce!)

Sierra in right field instead of Joyce? I'll take it but also get Brinson in the lineup.

 

Ya know what, put in Sierra over Dickerson.

1 minute ago, Michael said:

If it happens again, I'm going to blast my theory all over Twitter.

What theory?

Just now, jeffreysfishfry said:

What theory?

The one that Atlanta suddenly knows what's coming and comes back to score a bunch of runs right after we score, but hadn't been doing anything the rest of the games.

Just now, Michael said:

Sierra in right field instead of Joyce? I'll take it but also get Brinson in the lineup.

 

Ya know what, put in Sierra over Dickerson.

I just feel like we are not giving ourselves an opportunity to get speed on early and score early with Don's bullshit line-ups

Come on Dick. 

Just now, jeffreysfishfry said:

What theory?

That the Braves are stealing signs but only when losing or in a tight game until they get to a point where their lead becomes "enough."

Games 1 and 3 were nearly the same thing. Early runs for us followed immediately by incredible innings by them followed by absolutely nothing until we tied it again (game 3 in that case).

Just now, rmc523 said:

The one that Atlanta suddenly knows what's coming and comes back to score a bunch of runs right after we score, but hadn't been doing anything the rest of the games.

Why didn’t they know what’s coming all game then?

Just now, CyggyMarlin said:

I just feel like we are not giving ourselves an opportunity to get speed on early and score early with Don's bullshit line-ups

I'm with you. I want better contact bats leading off. Dickerson's not doing it.

Dick

Just now, Michael said:

That the Braves are stealing signs but only when losing or in a tight game until they get to a point where their lead becomes "enough."

Games 1 and 3 were nearly the same thing. Early runs for us followed immediately by incredible innings by them followed by absolutely nothing until we tied it again (game 3 in that case).

So they kept stealing signs in the 29-9 game?

Just now, GuitarPik said:

So they kept stealing signs in the 29-9 game?

IDK what happened that game. But this is more recent stuff.

1 minute ago, Michael said:

That the Braves are stealing signs but only when losing or in a tight game until they get to a point where their lead becomes "enough."

Games 1 and 3 were nearly the same thing. Early runs for us followed immediately by incredible innings by them followed by absolutely nothing until we tied it again (game 3 in that case).

While I would LMAO at this if true, I don’t find it to be the case. Unless if Braves come back here. I’ll listen for some trash cans banging 😂

7 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

So Atlanta will turn on the "run machine" where they know what's coming and immediately come back and take the lead?

.107 higher OPS at home

 

I guess Yimi now cause 3-4-5? OK, I suppose.

Nervous.

Extra conspiracy - no fans in the stands to notice suspicious activity 

 

1 minute ago, Michael said:

I'm with you. I want better contact bats leading off. Dickerson's not doing it.

I'd almost tinker with this line-up: 1. Sierra LF 2. Brinson - RF 3. Marte - CF 4. Anderson - 3B 5. Cooper - 1B 6. Aguilar (Either tired or slumping, dropping him down might help him) - DH 7. Rojas - SS 8. Alfaro - C 9. Berti - 2B (To get the line-up turned over)

3 minutes ago, Michael said:

That the Braves are stealing signs but only when losing or in a tight game until they get to a point where their lead becomes "enough."

Games 1 and 3 were nearly the same thing. Early runs for us followed immediately by incredible innings by them followed by absolutely nothing until we tied it again (game 3 in that case).

The series definitely had some crazy responses by the Braves. 

Just now, CyggyMarlin said:

I'd almost tinker with this line-up: 1. Sierra LF 2. Brinson - RF 3. Marte - CF 4. Anderson - 3B 5. Cooper - 1B 6. Aguilar (Either tired or slumping, dropping him down might help him) - DH 7. Rojas - SS 8. Alfaro - C 9. Berti - 2B (To get the line-up turned over)

Give me Wallach over Alfaro and you've got a deal.

Someone tell them to shut up.

The Braves read this board I guess and must have turned off their machine.

They hit off of Rogers and Sixto in the first and second innings, with strike two counts and few strike outs. 

Edited September 25, 20205 yr by jeffreysfishfry