December 7, 20169 yr Author Busy busy morning for the fish! VERY VERY VERY busy busy morning, to be exact
December 7, 20169 yr Author Busy busy morning for the fish! Ah crap just realized this means I probably have work to do on the IG account today.
December 7, 20169 yr No problem there. Had a very solid year. Yeah. His peripherals worry me a bit, but he does get a lot of ground balls, so there is a chance he replicates his success next year.
December 7, 20169 yr Good signing. Marlins started ramping things up on the 3rd day two years ago, last year they didn't do anything lol.
December 7, 20169 yr VERY VERY VERY busy busy morning, to be exact I know someone is VERY VERY VERY happy
December 7, 20169 yr I know someone is VERY VERY VERY happy Not until he sees a Hammel signing, he's caressing his Hammel 8x10 right now
December 7, 20169 yr Yeah. His peripherals worry me a bit, but he does get a lot of ground balls, so there is a chance he replicates his success next year. peripherals? paging @Mike Hill
December 7, 20169 yr I would be extremely content if they signed Hammel and made a trade for ONE frontline starter.
December 7, 20169 yr Author in @Mike Hill's mind yes If we don't sign Chapman Mike Hill is gonna go buy chap-stick and claim that's what he meant all along.
December 7, 20169 yr If we don't sign Chapman Mike Hill is gonna go buy chap-stick and claim that's what he meant all along. LMAO!!!!
December 7, 20169 yr McGowan and Locke were our alternates to Chapman and Fister* I'm semi-joking it could become a reality
December 7, 20169 yr The only fan base that needs a big name to be involved in every transaction and then bitches when the team has no depth
December 7, 20169 yr Mattingly talked about our lack of depth in the end of year press conference. At least they are starting to address it.
December 7, 20169 yr The only fan base that needs a big name to be involved in every transaction and then bitches when the team has no depth And then when they do sign a big name, said fanbase bitches about overspending. Honestly, I'd rather they spend recklessly than not spend at all. At least it shows they are attempting to put a winner on the field even if they don't exactly go about it in the best possible manner. Plus, for what it's worth, I think they have spent relatively wisely the last two years.
December 7, 20169 yr And then when they do sign a big name, said fanbase bitches about overspending. Honestly, I'd rather they spend recklessly than not spend at all. At least it shows they are attempting to put a winner on the field even if they don't exactly go about it in the best possible manner. Plus, for what it's worth, I think they have spent relatively wisely the last two years. I personally could careless about Loria's money and I'm hoping to hear a "Chapman to Marlins for $96 mil" being announced shortly.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.