Lcyberlina Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 :thumbup :thumbdown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravenlord Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 neither. both suck equally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 I don't know. One failed to kill Bin Laden, pardoned people he shouldn't, sold nuclear secrets to china when papers "dissappeared", bombed Iraq after breaking promises to the UN (not to use weapons inspectors as intelligence agents), tried to make universal health care, lied to the american people, and more bombings that didn't accomplish anything. The other passed unneccessary tax cuts, fabricated evdience for a massive war that will cost billions upon billions of dollars, passed more unneccesary tax cuts, increased bureaucracy with the biggest healthcare increases since lyndon johnson and creating the department of homeland security and increasing other agencies, lied to the American people, and let the chinese go off easy when they stole our plane and pilots. Which is worse? Both suck, but I would have to go with bush. The whole "fabricating war" thing is the most dishonest and expensive blunder of them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miami15 Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 I guarentee, Pudge'smommy will get her word in on this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Bill Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lcyberlina Posted January 31, 2004 Author Share Posted January 31, 2004 Bill Clinton. :thumbup Bill Clinton is tha man! "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"... Hmmm Bill, eating is cheating. Bill: She did me, I didn't do her. So technically I did not have sex with that woman. :mischief2 Debateble Bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Well, the evidence was no where on Monica's body, it was on a dress...but he didn't inhale, that's all that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lcyberlina Posted January 31, 2004 Author Share Posted January 31, 2004 ...but he didn't inhale, that's all that matters. :huh huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Well, the evidence was no where on Monica's body, it was on a dress...but he didn't inhale, that's all that matters. Dude, he wasnt smoking a blunt... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanleylicious Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 OMFG ROFLMFAO at Bush with the Binoculars....thats GREAT :laugh :laugh :laugh :laugh :laugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Well, the evidence was no where on Monica's body, it was on a dress...but he didn't inhale, that's all that matters. Dude, he wasnt smoking a blunt... The whole smoking pot controversy...92 election? Ring any bells? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Well, the evidence was no where on Monica's body, it was on a dress...but he didn't inhale, that's all that matters. Dude, he wasnt smoking a blunt... The whole smoking pot controversy...92 election? Ring any bells? As matter of fact, it doesnt... Then again I was 5 in 92 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Clinton saying it http://1337-online.com/audio/inhale.php More links http://www.trafford.com/4dcgi/robots/01-0378.html http://www.themarksman.com/clintonlies.html I was 7 at the time, I remember the whole nickelodian presidential thing too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAngels Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Shield your eyes or you will go blind! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lcyberlina Posted February 1, 2004 Author Share Posted February 1, 2004 Our President and minister of "Information"? :huh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgator Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Moved to a more appropriate forum for the topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaq-Man Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 clinton killed healthcare in america. bush killed america's foreign relations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DurableTear Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Both can (will) lead to serious consequensces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RippyO Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Clinton. He'd be a great wingman whenever we go cruising for chicks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravenlord Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 in the end, they're both the same, insignificant players in a game take far too importantly with results that are semi-predestined. i don't think Bush will win the election because he has done the thing he was elected to do. there's more to the picture than what anyone, or any group of people see, so this is not as much of a given as i would hope it to be. i voted Bush btw, because he is a baseball fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Das Texan Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 why does it even matter what clinton did sexually? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Bill Clinton got head in the oval office from an ugly chick, and had affairs with a least a few other ugly ones. George Dubya Bush started a war in part over nonexistent WMD's. Neither sounds cool to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Bush.... Im a fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAngels Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 why does it even matter what clinton did sexually? Because Clinton was being sued by Paula Jones for sexual harassment and then during the suit's preliminary inquiry Clinton lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. As a result, he became the 2nd U.S. President to undergo a impeachment trial. You should be more informed! It is U.S. History. :deadhorse :deadhorse Then President Clinton tried to block the Paula Jones sexual harrassment suit by claiming Presidential powers but his arguements were rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. Ironically, Clinton settled out of court after the damage was made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SorianoFanHFW Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 I love people's argument for Bush: "I'm pro bush..." What an argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts